| Literature DB >> 27326421 |
Masoumeh Abad1, Hossein Malekafzali2, Masoumeh Simbar3, Hassan Seyed Mosaavi4, Effat Merghati Khoei5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life is affected by electromagnetic field exposure in each person everyday life. However, this is extremely controversial issue.Entities:
Keywords: Abortion; Electromagnetic field; Pregnancy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27326421 PMCID: PMC4910032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) ISSN: 2476-3772
Associations of EMFs and Miscarriage (T-test
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Coupling of low frequency magnetic fields | 0.0001319291(0.0001304204) | 0.0001319291(0.0000154454) | 0.53 |
| Coupling of low frequency electric and fields | 0.5647905206(0.035880847) | 0.5675585715(0.0269017396) | 0.51 |
| Service-sum | 0.0000157265(0.0000006556) | 0.0000157571(0.0000005694) | 0.73 |
| Analogue radio and television broadcast services in central frequency 100 MHz | 0.0000071335(0.0000003262) | 0.0000071396(0.0000002803) | 0.89 |
| Digital radio and television broadcast services in central frequency 650 MHz | 0.0000031763(0.0000001379) | 0.0000031798(0.0000001125) | 0.85 |
| Mobile communications services 1.5 GHz | 0.0000034404(0.0000001722) | 0.0000034509(0.0000002095) | 0.67 |
| Wi-Fi access and MISC in central frequency 2.45 GHz | 0.0000019762(0.0000000932) | 0.0000019866(0.0000000776) | 0.42 |
Data presented as mean(STD)
Result of logestic regression
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Constant variable | <0.001 | 0.14 | <0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
| Age (Year) | --- | --- | 0.001 | 1.14 | 0.001 | 1.15 | 0.001 | 1.16 |
| Gravid reference group (Not PP) | --- | --- | 0.835 | 1.07 | 0.895 | 0.96 | 934 | 1.03 |
| Familial relationship (Nil Ref Group) | --- | --- | 0.063 | 1.93 | 0.050 | 2.03 | 0.023 | 2.31 |
| Family conflict | --- | --- | --- | --- | 0.002 | 3.39 | 0.001 | 3.93 |
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 0.447 | 1.12 |
| -2log likelihood | 345.21 | 309.02 | 292.88 | 285.92 | ||||
Amounts of waves standardized and entered the model.
Univariate analysis for quantitative and qualitative variables
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm hg) | 69.71 ± 8.68 | 66.11 ± 9.79 | 0.006 | |
| Systolic BP (mm hg) | 107.79 ± 9.98( | 108.8 ± 9.36 | 0.487 | |
| Weight gain during pregnancy (Kg) | 1.66 ± 5.37 | 2.15 ± 5.50 | 0.539 | |
| Using complements during pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 317 ± 88.1 | 43 ± 11.9 | 0.409 | |
| No | 60 (84.5) | 11 (15.5) | ||
| Miscarriage symptoms during pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 43 (64.2) | 24 (35.8) |
| |
| No | 334 (91.8) | 30 (8.2) | ||
| Sever vomiting | ||||
| Yes | 62 (93.9) | 4 (6.1) | 0.086 | |
| No | 316 (86.3) | 50 (13.7) | ||
| Traveling during the pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 190 (91.8) | 17 (8.2) | 0.007 | |
| No | 182 (83.1) | 37 (16.9) | ||
| Smoking during the pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | 0.370 | |
| No | 366 (87.4) | 53 (12.6) | ||
| Family quarrel during the pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 31 (72.1) | 12 (279) | 0.001 | |
| No | 342 (89.1) | 42 (10.9) | ||
| Any disease during the pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 54 (91.5) | 5 (8.5) | 0.198 | |
| No | 302 (95.6) | 14 (4.4) | ||
Data presented as mean±SD.
Data presented as n (%)