Literature DB >> 20628083

The relationship between residential proximity to extremely low frequency power transmission lines and adverse birth outcomes.

Nathalie Auger1, Dominique Joseph, Marc Goneau, Mark Daniel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields has been linked to adverse birth outcomes. This study evaluated whether maternal residential proximity to power transmission lines was associated with adverse birth outcomes.
METHODS: Live singleton births in the Montréal and Québec census metropolitan areas from 1990 to 2004 were extracted from the Québec birth file (N=707,215). Proximity was defined as residing within 400 m of a transmission line. Generalised estimating equations were used to evaluate associations between residential proximity to transmission lines and preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA) birth and infant sex, accounting for maternal age, education, marital status, ethnicity, parity, period of birth, and neighbourhood median household income.
RESULTS: There was no association between residential proximity to transmission lines and PTB, LBW and infant sex in unadjusted and adjusted models. A lower likelihood of SGA birth was present for some distance categories (eg, adjusted OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.95 for 50-75 m relative to ≥400 m).
CONCLUSION: Residential proximity to transmission lines is not associated with adverse births outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628083     DOI: 10.1136/jech.2009.097709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  6 in total

Review 1.  Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  PERSONAL MEASURES OF POWER-FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE AMONG MEN FROM AN INFERTILITY CLINIC: DISTRIBUTION, TEMPORAL VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION WITH THEIR FEMALE PARTNERS' EXPOSURE.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; Patricia Morey; Jennifer B Ford; John D Meeker
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Association between electromagnetic field exposure and abortion in pregnant women living in Tehran.

Authors:  Masoumeh Abad; Hossein Malekafzali; Masoumeh Simbar; Hassan Seyed Mosaavi; Effat Merghati Khoei
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-05

4.  The effects of 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on DNA damage and cellular functions in various neurogenic cells.

Authors:  Liling Su; Aziguli Yimaer; Xiaoxia Wei; Zhengping Xu; Guangdi Chen
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Prenatal exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic field and its impact on fetal growth.

Authors:  Yanfeng Ren; Jianping Chen; Maohua Miao; De-Kun Li; Hong Liang; Ziliang Wang; Fen Yang; Xiaowei Sun; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Exposure to cooking fuels and birth weight in Lanzhou, China: a birth cohort study.

Authors:  Min Jiang; Jie Qiu; Min Zhou; Xiaochun He; Hongmei Cui; Catherine Lerro; Ling Lv; Xiaojuan Lin; Chong Zhang; Honghong Zhang; Ruifeng Xu; Daling Zhu; Yun Dang; Xudong Han; Hanru Zhang; Haiya Bai; Ya Chen; Zhongfeng Tang; Ru Lin; Tingting Yao; Jie Su; Xiaoying Xu; Xiaohui Liu; Wendi Wang; Yueyuan Wang; Bin Ma; Weitao Qiu; Cairong Zhu; Suping Wang; Huang Huang; Nan Zhao; Xiaosong Li; Qing Liu; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.