Literature DB >> 11805582

A nested case-control study of residential and personal magnetic field measures and miscarriages.

Geraldine M Lee1, Raymond R Neutra, Lilia Hristova, Michael Yost, Robert A Hiatt.   

Abstract

We conducted a nested case-control study (177 cases, 550 controls) to assess the relation between retrospective magnetic field measures and clinical miscarriage among members of the northern California Kaiser Permanente medical care system. We also conducted a prospective substudy of 219 participants of the same parent cohort to determine whether 12-week and 30-week exposure assessments were similar. We evaluated wire codes, area measures, and three personal meter metrics: (1) the average difference between consecutive levels (a rate-of-change metric), (2) the maximum level, and (3) the time-weighted average. For wire codes and area measures we found little association. For the personal metrics (30 weeks after last menstrual period), we found positive associations. Each exposure was divided into quartiles, with the lowest quartile as referent. Starting with the highest quartile, adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were 3.1 (95% CI = 1.6-6.0), 2.3 (95% CI = 1.2-4.4), and 1.5 (95% CI = 0.8-3.1) for the rate-of-change metric; 2.3 (95% CI = 1.2-4.4), 1.9 (95% CI = 1.0-3.5), and 1.4 (95% CI = 0.7-2.8) for the maximum value; and 1.7 (95% CI = 0.9-3.3), 1.7 (95% CI = 0.9-3.3), and 1.7 (95% CI = 0.9-3.3) for the time-weighted average. The odds ratio conveyed by being above a 24-hour time-weighted average of 2 milligauss was 1.0 (95% CI = 0.5-2.1). Exposure assessment measurements at 12 weeks were poorly correlated with those taken at 30 weeks. Nonetheless, the prospective substudy results regarding miscarriage risk were consistent with the nested study results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805582     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  20 in total

1.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields during pregnancy.

Authors:  Gideon Koren
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Analysis of personal and bedroom exposure to ELF-MFs in children in Italy and Switzerland.

Authors:  Benjamin Struchen; Ilaria Liorni; Marta Parazzini; Stephanie Gängler; Paolo Ravazzani; Martin Röösli
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Personal power-frequency magnetic field exposure in women recruited at an infertility clinic: association with physical activity and temporal variability.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Possible health benefits from reducing occupational magnetic fields.

Authors:  Joseph D Bowman; Tapas K Ray; Robert M Park
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Occupational magnetic field exposure among women in Stockholm County, Sweden.

Authors:  U M Forssén; G Mezei; G Nise; M Feychting
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

7.  PERSONAL MEASURES OF POWER-FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE AMONG MEN FROM AN INFERTILITY CLINIC: DISTRIBUTION, TEMPORAL VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION WITH THEIR FEMALE PARTNERS' EXPOSURE.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; Patricia Morey; Jennifer B Ford; John D Meeker
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Temporal variability of daily personal magnetic field exposure metrics in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Kelly R Evenson; David A Savitz; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  A prospective study of in-utero exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of childhood obesity.

Authors:  De-Kun Li; Jeannette R Ferber; Roxana Odouli; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.