Roberto Secades-Villa1, Irene Pericot-Valverde1, Sara Weidberg2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijóo s/n, 33003, Oviedo, Spain. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijóo s/n, 33003, Oviedo, Spain. weidbergsara.uo@uniovi.es.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Relative reinforcing efficacy (RRE) is a core feature of behavioral economic theories of addiction. A measure of RRE in smokers is the cigarette purchase task (CPT). Only one previous study has assessed whether CPT indices predict treatment outcomes among smokers with substance use disorders (SUDs) who were not motivated to quit smoking, limiting the generalizability of the results. OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed at exploring demand indices as predictors of smoking abstinence among participants receiving acognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) combined with contingency management (CM) versus CBT alone. It also sought to validate the CPT as a measure of RRE. METHODS:Participants were 159 (62.3 % women) smokers aged 44.8 (SD 12.6) years randomized to CBT alone or combined with CM. They smoked an average of 21.1 (SD 8.5) cigarettes per day, and their mean score on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) was 5.5 (SD 1.9). Demand indices were generated from a hypothetical CPT assessed at baseline. RESULTS:Smoking levels were high (≥20 cigarettes) at prices of up to €0.10 per cigarette. Elasticity was the only index that predicted smoking abstinence at the end of treatment, but only in the CBT + CM condition. The variance explained by elasticity was 6.8 % in the independent model and 4.6 % in the covariate model. Cigarette demand indices and smoking-related measures were significantly associated. CONCLUSION: This is the first research showing that CPT is a valid measure of CM outcome among treatment-seeking smokers. This study also provides evidence of convergent validity for the CPT.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Relative reinforcing efficacy (RRE) is a core feature of behavioral economic theories of addiction. A measure of RRE in smokers is the cigarette purchase task (CPT). Only one previous study has assessed whether CPT indices predict treatment outcomes among smokers with substance use disorders (SUDs) who were not motivated to quit smoking, limiting the generalizability of the results. OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed at exploring demand indices as predictors of smoking abstinence among participants receiving a cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) combined with contingency management (CM) versus CBT alone. It also sought to validate the CPT as a measure of RRE. METHODS:Participants were 159 (62.3 % women) smokers aged 44.8 (SD 12.6) years randomized to CBT alone or combined with CM. They smoked an average of 21.1 (SD 8.5) cigarettes per day, and their mean score on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) was 5.5 (SD 1.9). Demand indices were generated from a hypothetical CPT assessed at baseline. RESULTS: Smoking levels were high (≥20 cigarettes) at prices of up to €0.10 per cigarette. Elasticity was the only index that predicted smoking abstinence at the end of treatment, but only in the CBT + CM condition. The variance explained by elasticity was 6.8 % in the independent model and 4.6 % in the covariate model. Cigarette demand indices and smoking-related measures were significantly associated. CONCLUSION: This is the first research showing that CPT is a valid measure of CM outcome among treatment-seeking smokers. This study also provides evidence of convergent validity for the CPT.
Authors: James MacKillop; James G Murphy; Lara A Ray; Daniel T A Eisenberg; Stephen A Lisman; J Koji Lum; David S Wilson Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Michael T Amlung; John Acker; Monika K Stojek; James G Murphy; James MacKillop Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Bryan W Heckman; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; Sara Hitchman; Richard J O'Connor; Warren K Bickel; Jeffrey S Stein; Hua-Hie Yong; Georges J Nahhas; Derek A Pope; Ce Shang; Kai-Wen Cheng; David T Levy; K Michael Cummings Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Cara M Murphy; James MacKillop; Rosemarie A Martin; Jennifer W Tidey; Suzanne M Colby; Damaris J Rohsenow Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-05-13 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Derek D Reed; Ryan Redner; Joan M Skelly; Ivori A Zvorsky; Allison N Kurti Journal: J Exp Anal Behav Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 2.468
Authors: Tingting Zhao; Xianghua Luo; Haitao Chu; Chap T Le; Leonard H Epstein; Janet L Thomas Journal: J Exp Anal Behav Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.468
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Alba González-Roz; Roberto Secades-Villa; Gema Aonso-Diego; Sara Weidberg; José R Fernández-Hermida Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Bryan W Heckman; K Michael Cummings; Georges J Nahas; Marc C Willemsen; Richard J O'Connor; Ron Borland; Alexander A Hirsch; Warren K Bickel; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.244