Literature DB >> 27325055

Action selection by temporally distal goal states.

Markus Janczyk1, Moritz Durst2, Rolf Ulrich2.   

Abstract

In line with ideomotor theory, numerous response-effect compatibility (REC) studies have revealed evidence that action effects are anticipated prior to action initiation, as indicated by an REC effect: For example, a response is given faster when its effect occurs on the same rather than on the opposite side. So far, REC studies have only investigated immediate effects-that is, effects occurring immediately after the response is given. However, it may be argued that in everyday life many actions cause effects that do not occur immediately. Additionally, because actions can have more than one effect, desired effects occurring in the future may only be arrived at if fundamental effects are achieved first. In the present study, we investigated whether temporally more distal effects are anticipated in order to initiate actions, and how multiple, serially occurring effects are represented. To this end, a spatial REC paradigm was extended in such a way that a first, immediate effect (i.e., immediately following the response; E1) was followed 500 ms later by another visual effect (E2). An REC effect was only observed for the temporally more distal E2, and this result suggests that temporally more distal effects can also be anticipated during action selection.

Keywords:  Action control; Action effects; Ideomotor theory; Motor learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27325055     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1096-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review.

Authors:  G Wulf; W Prinz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning.

Authors:  Nancy H McNevin; Charles H Shea; Gabriele Wulf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-10-30

Review 3.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  The locus of tool-transformation costs.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Roland Pfister; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Through the portal: Effect anticipation in the central bottleneck.

Authors:  Robert Wirth; Roland Pfister; Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2015-08-03

6.  Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions.

Authors:  Arvid Herwig; Wolfgang Prinz; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Iring Koch; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2013

8.  Representing the hyphen in action-effect associations: automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action-effect intervals.

Authors:  David Dignath; Roland Pfister; Andreas B Eder; Andrea Kiesel; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Effect-based control of facial expressions: evidence from action-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Ljubica Lozo; Roland Neumann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

10.  Harleß' Apparatus of Will: 150 years later.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Free choice tasks as random generation tasks: an investigation through working memory manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Anticipation of delayed action-effects: learning when an effect occurs, without knowing what this effect will be.

Authors:  David Dignath; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-14

3.  Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Michael Dambacher; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-03

4.  Intentional binding of two effects.

Authors:  Miriam Ruess; Roland Thomaschke; Carola Haering; Dorit Wenke; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-08

5.  The role of feedback delay in dual-task performance.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Robert Wirth; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-03

6.  Common mechanisms in error monitoring and action effect monitoring.

Authors:  Robert Steinhauser; Robert Wirth; Wilfried Kunde; Markus Janczyk; Marco Steinhauser
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Action effect features, but not anatomical features, determine the Backward Crosstalk Effect: evidence from crossed-hands experiments.

Authors:  Sandra Renas; Moritz Durst; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-15

8.  Taking a Detour: Affective Stimuli Facilitate Ultimately (Not Immediately) Compatible Approach-Avoidance Tendencies.

Authors:  Regina Reichardt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-06

9.  Exploring Modality Compatibility in the Response-Effect Compatibility Paradigm.

Authors:  Noémi Földes; Andrea M Philipp; Arnaud Badets; Iring Koch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

10.  The impact of the verbal instruction and task characteristics on effect-based action control.

Authors:  Diana Vogel; Matthias Rudolf; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.