Kristan A Leech1, Catherine R Kinnaird2, Carey L Holleran3, Jennifer Kahn4, T George Hornby5. 1. K.A. Leech, PT, DPT, PhD, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, and Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 2. C.R. Kinnaird, ME, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. 3. C.L. Holleran, PT, MPT, DHS, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. 4. J. Kahn, PT, DPT, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. 5. T.G. Hornby, PT, PhD, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, 345 E Superior St, Room 1382, Chicago, IL 60611 (USA). g-hornby@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-intensity stepping practice may be a critical component to improve gait following motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). However, such practice is discouraged by traditional theories of rehabilitation that suggest high-intensity locomotor exercise degrades gait performance. Accordingly, such training is thought to reinforce abnormal movement patterns, although evidence to support this notion is limited. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were: (1) to evaluate the effects of short-term manipulations in locomotor intensity on gait performance in people with iSCI and (2) to evaluate potential detrimental effects of high-intensity locomotor training on walking performance. DESIGN: A single-day, repeated-measures, pretraining-posttraining study design was used. METHODS: Nineteen individuals with chronic iSCI performed a graded-intensity locomotor exercise task with simultaneous collection of lower extremity kinematic and electromyographic data. Measures of interest were compared across intensity levels of 33%, 67%, and 100% of peak gait speed. A subset of 9 individuals participated in 12 weeks of high-intensity locomotor training. Similar measurements were collected and compared between pretraining and posttraining evaluations. RESULTS: The results indicate that short-term increases in intensity led to significant improvements in muscle activity, spatiotemporal metrics, and joint excursions, with selected improvements in measures of locomotor coordination. High-intensity locomotor training led to significant increases in peak gait speed (0.64-0.80 m/s), and spatiotemporal and kinematic metrics indicate a trend for improved coordination. LIMITATIONS: Measures of gait performance were assessed during treadmill ambulation and not compared with a control group. Generalizability of these results to overground ambulation is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity locomotor exercise and training does not degrade, but rather improves, locomotor function and quality in individuals with iSCI, which contrasts with traditional theories of motor dysfunction following neurologic injury.
BACKGROUND: High-intensity stepping practice may be a critical component to improve gait following motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). However, such practice is discouraged by traditional theories of rehabilitation that suggest high-intensity locomotor exercise degrades gait performance. Accordingly, such training is thought to reinforce abnormal movement patterns, although evidence to support this notion is limited. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were: (1) to evaluate the effects of short-term manipulations in locomotor intensity on gait performance in people with iSCI and (2) to evaluate potential detrimental effects of high-intensity locomotor training on walking performance. DESIGN: A single-day, repeated-measures, pretraining-posttraining study design was used. METHODS: Nineteen individuals with chronic iSCI performed a graded-intensity locomotor exercise task with simultaneous collection of lower extremity kinematic and electromyographic data. Measures of interest were compared across intensity levels of 33%, 67%, and 100% of peak gait speed. A subset of 9 individuals participated in 12 weeks of high-intensity locomotor training. Similar measurements were collected and compared between pretraining and posttraining evaluations. RESULTS: The results indicate that short-term increases in intensity led to significant improvements in muscle activity, spatiotemporal metrics, and joint excursions, with selected improvements in measures of locomotor coordination. High-intensity locomotor training led to significant increases in peak gait speed (0.64-0.80 m/s), and spatiotemporal and kinematic metrics indicate a trend for improved coordination. LIMITATIONS: Measures of gait performance were assessed during treadmill ambulation and not compared with a control group. Generalizability of these results to overground ambulation is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity locomotor exercise and training does not degrade, but rather improves, locomotor function and quality in individuals with iSCI, which contrasts with traditional theories of motor dysfunction following neurologic injury.
Authors: Gabrielle Brazg; Meghan Fahey; Carey L Holleran; Mark Connolly; Jane Woodward; Patrick W Hennessy; Brian D Schmit; T George Hornby Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Jennifer K Lotter; Christopher E Henderson; Abbey Plawecki; Molly E Holthus; Emily H Lucas; Marzieh M Ardestani; Brian D Schmit; T George Hornby Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Tanya Onushko; Gordhan B Mahtani; Gabrielle Brazg; T George Hornby; Brian D Schmit Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Carey L Holleran; Patrick W Hennessey; Abigail L Leddy; Gordhan B Mahtani; Gabrielle Brazg; Brian D Schmit; T George Hornby Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Won Joon Sohn; Andrew Q Tan; Heather B Hayes; Saahith Pochiraju; Joan Deffeyes; Randy D Trumbower Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 5.269