Literature DB >> 27312510

An Italian version of the Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale: a reliable and valid tool for assessment of simulation performance.

Jeffrey Micheal Franc1,2, Manuela Verde3, Alba Ripoll Gallardo3, Luca Carenzo3, Pier Luigi Ingrassia3.   

Abstract

Objective measurement of simulation performance requires a validated and reliable tool. However, no published Italian language assessment tool is available. Translation of a published English language tool, the Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (GRS), may lead to a validated and reliable tool. After developing an Italian language translation of the English language tool, the study measured the reliability of the new tool by comparison with the English language tool used independently in the same simulation scenarios. In addition, the validity of the Italian language tool was measured by comparison to a skills score also applied independently. The correlation coefficient between the Italian language overall GRS and the English language overall GRS was 0.82 (adjusted 95 % confidence interval: 0.62-0.92). The correlation coefficient between the Italian language overall GRS and the skill score was 0.85 (adjusted 95 % confidence interval 0.68-0.94). This study demonstrated that the Italian language GRS has acceptable reliability when compared with the English language tool, suggesting that it can be used reliably to evaluate the performance during simulated emergencies. The study also suggests that the tool has acceptable validity for assessing the simulation performance. The study suggests that the Italian language GRS translation has reasonable reliability when compared with the English language GRS and reasonable validity when compared with the assessment of the skills scores. Data suggest that the instrument is adequately reliable for informal and formative type of examinations, but may require further confirmation before use for high-stake examinations such as licensing.

Keywords:  Assessment tool; Emergency medicine; High-fidelity simulation; Reliability; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27312510     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1486-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  14 in total

1.  Assessment of a clinical performance evaluation tool for use in a simulator-based testing environment: a pilot study.

Authors:  James A Gordon; David N Tancredi; William D Binder; William M Wilkerson; David W Shaffer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data.

Authors:  Susan M Downing
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data.

Authors:  Steven M Downing
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 4.  Role of simulation in U.S. physician licensure and certification.

Authors:  Adam I Levine; Andrew D Schwartz; Ethan O Bryson; Samuel Demaria
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

5.  Reproducible research in computational science.

Authors:  Roger D Peng
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The role of simulation in certification.

Authors:  Jo Buyske
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Assessment in medical education.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Teaching surgeons about non-technical skills.

Authors:  R Flin; S Yule; S Paterson-Brown; N Maran; D Rowley; G Youngson
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.392

9.  SimWars.

Authors:  Yasuharu Okuda; Steven A Godwin; Lisa Jacobson; Ernest Wang; Scott Weingart
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: An approach to enhance the surgical team performance.

Authors:  Kinga A Powers; Scott T Rehrig; Noel Irias; Hedwig A Albano; Andrew Malinow; Stephanie B Jones; Donald W Moorman; John B Pawlowski; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the interprofessional collaboration scale validation between nurses towards other health care professionals occupied in Italian emergency medical services.

Authors:  Marco Carradore; Massimo Guasconi; Gian Domenico Giusti; Giovanna Artioli; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-08-31

2.  A novel simulation competition format as an effective instructional tool in post-graduate medical education.

Authors:  Pier Luigi Ingrassia; Jeffrey Michael Franc; Luca Carenzo
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-08-09

3.  Residents working with Médecins Sans Frontières: training and pilot evaluation.

Authors:  Alba Ripoll-Gallardo; Luca Ragazzoni; Ettore Mazzanti; Grazia Meneghetti; Jeffrey Michael Franc; Alessandro Costa; Francesco Della Corte
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.953

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.