Literature DB >> 27308026

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of (E)-3-(2-chloro-6-fluoro-phen-yl)-1-(3-fluoro-4-meth-oxy-phen-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

Nur Hafiq Hanif Hassan1, Amzar Ahlami Abdullah1, Suhana Arshad1, Nuridayanti Che Khalib1, Ibrahim Abdul Razak1.   

Abstract

In the title chalcone derivative, C16H11ClF2O2, the enone group adopts an E conformation. The dihedral angle between the benzene rings is 0.47 (9)° and an intra-molecular C-H⋯F hydrogen bond closes an S(6) ring. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked into a three-dimensional network by C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and aromatic π-π stacking inter-actions are also observed [centroid-centroid separation = 3.5629 (18) Å]. The inter-molecular inter-actions in the crystal structure were qu-anti-fied and analysed using Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; chalcone; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding

Year:  2016        PMID: 27308026      PMCID: PMC4908511          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016006526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Chalcone derivatives possess a wide range of biological properties such as anti­bacterial (Jarag et al., 2011 ▸), anti-inflammatory (Mukherjee et al., 2001 ▸) and anti-oxidant (Arty et al., 2000 ▸) activities. As part of our ongoing studies on chalcone derivatives, we hereby report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound, (I).

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The enone moiety (O1/C7–C9) adopts an E-conformation with respect to C7=C8 bond. The mol­ecule is slightly twisted at the C9—-C10 bond with a C8—C9—C10C15 torsion angle of −2.2 (4)° and a maximum deviation of 0.193 (16) Å for atom O1. The dihedral angle between the terminal benzene rings (C1–C6 and C10C15) is 0.47 (9)°. The least-squares plane through the enone moiety (O1/C7–C9) makes dihedral angles of 2.87 (14) and 3.33 (14)° with the C1–C6 and C10C15 benzene rings, respectively. An intra­molecular C8—H8A⋯F1 hydrogen bond (Table 1 ▸) is observed, generating an S(6) ring motif. The bond lengths and angles are comparable with the equivalent data for previously reported structures; (Razak et al., 2009 ▸; Harrison et al., 2006a ▸).
Figure 1

The structure of the title compound, showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. The intra­molecular C—H⋯F hydrogen bond is shown as a dashed line.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2A⋯O1i 0.932.503.391 (4)162
C3—H3A⋯O2ii 0.932.523.441 (4)171
C8—H8A⋯F10.932.212.842 (4)124

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked into a three-dimensional network via C2—H2A⋯O1 (x − , −y + , z + ) and C3—H3A⋯O2 (x − , y + , z) hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸), as shown in Fig. 2 ▸. The crystal structure also features π–π inter­actions [Cg1Cg2 (−1 + x, y, z), centroid-to-centroid distance = 3.5629 (18) Å, where Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the C1–C6 and C10C15 rings, respectively].
Figure 2

The packing in (I) showing C—H⋯O and π–π inter­actions as dashed lines.

Analysis of the Hirshfeld Surfaces

Crystal Explorer 3.1(Wolff et al., 2012 ▸) was used to analyse the close contacts in the crystal of (I), which can be summarized with fingerprint plots mapped over d norm, electrostatic potential, shape index and curvedness. The electrostatic potentials were calculated using TONTO (Spackman et al., 2008 ▸; Jayatilaka et al., 2005 ▸) integrated within Crystal Explorer. The electrostatic potentials were mapped on Hirshfeld surfaces using the STO-3G basis set at Hartree–Fock level theory over a range ±0.03 au. The strong C—H⋯O inter­actions are visualized as bright-red spots between the respective donor and acceptor atoms on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm (Fig. 3 ▸ a) with neighbouring mol­ecules connected by C2—H2A⋯O1 and C3—H3A⋯O2 hydrogen bonds. This finding is corroborated by Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over the electrostatic potential (Fig. 3 ▸ b) showing the negative potential around the oxygen atoms as light-red clouds and the positive potential around hydrogen atoms as light-blue clouds.
Figure 3

(a) d norm mapped on Hirshfeld surfaces for visualizing the inter­molecular inter­actions of the title chalcone compound. (b) Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over the electrostatic potential. Dotted lines (green) represent hydrogen bonds.

Significant inter­molecular inter­actions are plotted in Fig. 4 ▸: the H⋯H inter­actions appear as the largest region of the fingerprint plot with a high concentration in the middle region, shown in light blue, at d = d ∼1.4 Å (Fig. 4 ▸ a) with overall Hirshfeld surfaces of 27.5%. The contribution from the O⋯H/H⋯O contacts, corresponding to C—H⋯O inter­actions, is represented by a pair of sharp spikes characteristic of a strong hydrogen-bond inter­action having almost the same d + d ∼2.3 Å (Fig. 4 ▸ b).
Figure 4

Fingerprint plots for the title chalcone compound, broken down into contributions from specific pairs of atom types. For each plot, the grey shadow is an outline of the complete fingerprint plot. Surfaces to the right highlight the relevant surface patches associated with the specific contacts, with d norm mapped in the same manner as Fig. 3 ▸ a.

The CC contacts, which refer to π–·π stacking inter­actions, contribute 13.7% of the Hirshfeld surfaces. This appears as a distinct triangle at around d = d ∼1.8 Å (Fig. 4 ▸ c). The presence of the π–π stacking inter­actions is also indicated by the appearance of red and blue triangles on the shape-indexed surfaces, identified with black arrows in Fig. 5 ▸, and in the flat regions on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over curvedness in Fig. 6 ▸.
Figure 5

Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over the shape index of the title chalcone compound.

Figure 6

Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over curvedness of the title chalcone compound.

Synthesis and crystallization

A mixture of 3-fluoro-4-meth­oxy­aceto­phenone (0.1 mol, 0.08 g) and 2-chloro-6-fluoro­benzaldehyde (0.1 mol, 0.08 g) was dissolved in methanol (20 ml). A catalytic amount of NaOH (5 ml, 20%) was added to the solution dropwise with vigorous stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred for about 5–6 h at room temperature. After stirring, the contents of the flask were poured into ice-cold water (50 ml) and the resulting crude solid was collected by filtration. Brownish blocks of (I) were grown from an acetone solution by slow evaporation.

Refinement details

Crystal data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.93 Å) and refined using a riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C). In the final refinement, the most disagreeable reflection (020) was omitted.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H11ClF2O2
M r 308.70
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C c
Temperature (K)294
a, b, c (Å)9.0832 (13), 11.1072 (13), 13.9564 (17)
β (°)102.027 (3)
V3)1377.1 (3)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.30
Crystal size (mm)0.45 × 0.17 × 0.13
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)
T min, T max 0.791, 0.889
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections14473, 4003, 3111
R int 0.031
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.705
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.039, 0.116, 1.05
No. of reflections4003
No. of parameters191
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.20, −0.27
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1298 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] Parsons et al. (2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.08 (2)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▸), SHELXS97 and SHELXTL (Sheldrick 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016006526/hb7578sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016006526/hb7578Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016006526/hb7578Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1474605 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C16H11ClF2O2F(000) = 632
Mr = 308.70Dx = 1.489 Mg m3
Monoclinic, CcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.0832 (13) ÅCell parameters from 4692 reflections
b = 11.1072 (13) Åθ = 2.9–28.9°
c = 13.9564 (17) ŵ = 0.30 mm1
β = 102.027 (3)°T = 294 K
V = 1377.1 (3) Å3Block, brown
Z = 40.45 × 0.17 × 0.13 mm
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer4003 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3111 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.031
φ and ω scansθmax = 30.1°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.791, Tmax = 0.889k = −15→15
14473 measured reflectionsl = −19→19
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0664P)2 + 0.0639P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.116(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
4003 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.27 e Å3
191 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1298 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] Parsons et al. (2013)
2 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.08 (2)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.01382 (11)0.90043 (10)0.28908 (7)0.0766 (3)
F10.2567 (2)0.7732 (2)0.63725 (14)0.0679 (6)
F21.0123 (2)0.5464 (2)0.42338 (15)0.0676 (5)
O10.5069 (4)0.7363 (3)0.3366 (2)0.0864 (9)
O21.0692 (2)0.5000 (2)0.61111 (18)0.0654 (6)
C10.1380 (3)0.8232 (3)0.5705 (2)0.0473 (6)
C20.0177 (4)0.8618 (3)0.6081 (2)0.0558 (7)
H2A0.01810.85380.67450.067*
C3−0.1020 (3)0.9121 (3)0.5458 (3)0.0555 (7)
H3A−0.18440.93910.56980.067*
C4−0.1017 (3)0.9231 (3)0.4480 (3)0.0533 (7)
H4A−0.18370.95730.40570.064*
C50.0209 (3)0.8832 (2)0.4124 (2)0.0447 (6)
C60.1479 (3)0.8313 (2)0.47289 (19)0.0409 (5)
C70.2772 (3)0.7932 (3)0.4327 (2)0.0480 (6)
H7A0.26700.80340.36550.058*
C80.4052 (4)0.7467 (3)0.4783 (2)0.0527 (6)
H8A0.42150.73210.54530.063*
C90.5248 (3)0.7170 (3)0.4236 (2)0.0501 (6)
C100.6672 (3)0.6632 (2)0.4787 (2)0.0428 (6)
C110.7762 (3)0.6300 (3)0.4255 (2)0.0458 (6)
H11A0.75980.64330.35830.055*
C120.9060 (3)0.5780 (2)0.4739 (2)0.0463 (6)
C130.9367 (3)0.5544 (3)0.5741 (2)0.0478 (6)
C140.8298 (3)0.5889 (3)0.6265 (2)0.0505 (6)
H14A0.84710.57620.69380.061*
C150.6969 (3)0.6426 (3)0.5783 (2)0.0480 (6)
H15A0.62590.66530.61420.058*
C161.1014 (5)0.4726 (5)0.7133 (3)0.0857 (13)
H16A1.19720.43290.73040.129*
H16B1.02450.42060.72780.129*
H16C1.10410.54570.75020.129*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0769 (5)0.1065 (7)0.0450 (4)0.0182 (5)0.0090 (3)0.0033 (4)
F10.0590 (11)0.0974 (14)0.0482 (10)0.0220 (9)0.0137 (8)0.0121 (10)
F20.0564 (9)0.0931 (14)0.0632 (11)0.0103 (9)0.0350 (9)−0.0092 (10)
O10.0880 (18)0.125 (2)0.0543 (14)0.0458 (17)0.0320 (13)0.0164 (15)
O20.0398 (10)0.1009 (18)0.0566 (13)0.0060 (11)0.0124 (9)−0.0102 (12)
C10.0477 (13)0.0491 (14)0.0478 (14)0.0008 (11)0.0161 (11)0.0033 (12)
C20.0601 (17)0.0623 (17)0.0529 (16)−0.0056 (14)0.0297 (14)−0.0028 (14)
C30.0464 (14)0.0587 (16)0.0685 (19)−0.0037 (12)0.0281 (13)−0.0069 (14)
C40.0398 (13)0.0518 (15)0.068 (2)−0.0015 (11)0.0099 (12)−0.0036 (14)
C50.0441 (13)0.0465 (14)0.0436 (13)−0.0029 (11)0.0098 (11)−0.0027 (10)
C60.0421 (12)0.0388 (12)0.0435 (13)−0.0024 (9)0.0130 (10)−0.0011 (10)
C70.0517 (14)0.0520 (15)0.0441 (14)0.0054 (12)0.0189 (11)0.0010 (11)
C80.0542 (15)0.0589 (16)0.0501 (15)0.0084 (13)0.0225 (12)−0.0005 (13)
C90.0540 (14)0.0515 (14)0.0510 (15)0.0076 (12)0.0247 (12)−0.0003 (12)
C100.0471 (13)0.0385 (12)0.0490 (14)−0.0052 (10)0.0242 (11)−0.0053 (10)
C110.0503 (14)0.0491 (14)0.0437 (13)−0.0043 (11)0.0229 (11)−0.0057 (11)
C120.0426 (12)0.0540 (15)0.0491 (14)−0.0051 (11)0.0246 (11)−0.0112 (12)
C130.0365 (12)0.0564 (15)0.0527 (15)−0.0066 (11)0.0147 (11)−0.0110 (12)
C140.0449 (13)0.0684 (18)0.0418 (14)−0.0043 (12)0.0174 (11)−0.0068 (13)
C150.0446 (12)0.0583 (15)0.0473 (14)−0.0024 (11)0.0236 (11)−0.0070 (12)
C160.0552 (19)0.142 (4)0.057 (2)0.014 (2)0.0050 (16)−0.002 (2)
Cl1—C51.720 (3)C7—H7A0.9300
F1—C11.386 (3)C8—C91.489 (4)
F2—C121.354 (3)C8—H8A0.9300
O1—C91.209 (4)C9—C101.485 (4)
O2—C131.349 (4)C10—C151.379 (4)
O2—C161.427 (5)C10—C111.405 (3)
C1—C21.376 (4)C11—C121.359 (4)
C1—C61.387 (4)C11—H11A0.9300
C2—C31.363 (5)C12—C131.393 (4)
C2—H2A0.9300C13—C141.386 (4)
C3—C41.371 (5)C14—C151.389 (4)
C3—H3A0.9300C14—H14A0.9300
C4—C51.383 (4)C15—H15A0.9300
C4—H4A0.9300C16—H16A0.9600
C5—C61.403 (4)C16—H16B0.9600
C6—C71.466 (3)C16—H16C0.9600
C7—C81.309 (4)
C13—O2—C16117.3 (3)O1—C9—C8121.0 (3)
C2—C1—F1115.9 (3)C10—C9—C8118.2 (3)
C2—C1—C6125.0 (3)C15—C10—C11118.5 (3)
F1—C1—C6119.1 (2)C15—C10—C9123.7 (2)
C3—C2—C1118.4 (3)C11—C10—C9117.7 (2)
C3—C2—H2A120.8C12—C11—C10118.9 (3)
C1—C2—H2A120.8C12—C11—H11A120.6
C2—C3—C4120.3 (3)C10—C11—H11A120.6
C2—C3—H3A119.8F2—C12—C11119.4 (3)
C4—C3—H3A119.8F2—C12—C13117.3 (3)
C3—C4—C5119.9 (3)C11—C12—C13123.3 (2)
C3—C4—H4A120.1O2—C13—C14126.0 (3)
C5—C4—H4A120.1O2—C13—C12116.4 (2)
C4—C5—C6122.5 (3)C14—C13—C12117.6 (3)
C4—C5—Cl1117.3 (2)C13—C14—C15119.8 (3)
C6—C5—Cl1120.1 (2)C13—C14—H14A120.1
C1—C6—C5113.8 (2)C15—C14—H14A120.1
C1—C6—C7125.3 (3)C10—C15—C14121.9 (2)
C5—C6—C7120.9 (2)C10—C15—H15A119.1
C8—C7—C6129.1 (3)C14—C15—H15A119.1
C8—C7—H7A115.5O2—C16—H16A109.5
C6—C7—H7A115.5O2—C16—H16B109.5
C7—C8—C9120.5 (3)H16A—C16—H16B109.5
C7—C8—H8A119.7O2—C16—H16C109.5
C9—C8—H8A119.7H16A—C16—H16C109.5
O1—C9—C10120.8 (3)H16B—C16—H16C109.5
F1—C1—C2—C3179.8 (3)O1—C9—C10—C15177.8 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C30.1 (5)C8—C9—C10—C15−2.2 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C40.2 (5)O1—C9—C10—C11−3.2 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.1 (5)C8—C9—C10—C11176.9 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.3 (4)C15—C10—C11—C120.5 (4)
C3—C4—C5—Cl1−179.8 (2)C9—C10—C11—C12−178.5 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.4 (4)C10—C11—C12—F2−179.6 (2)
F1—C1—C6—C5179.9 (2)C10—C11—C12—C130.7 (4)
C2—C1—C6—C7178.4 (3)C16—O2—C13—C141.7 (5)
F1—C1—C6—C7−1.3 (4)C16—O2—C13—C12−178.6 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C10.5 (4)F2—C12—C13—O2−1.1 (4)
Cl1—C5—C6—C1180.0 (2)C11—C12—C13—O2178.6 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C7−178.3 (3)F2—C12—C13—C14178.7 (2)
Cl1—C5—C6—C71.2 (3)C11—C12—C13—C14−1.7 (4)
C1—C6—C7—C8−0.7 (5)O2—C13—C14—C15−179.0 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C8178.0 (3)C12—C13—C14—C151.3 (4)
C6—C7—C8—C9−178.2 (3)C11—C10—C15—C14−0.9 (4)
C7—C8—C9—O10.8 (5)C9—C10—C15—C14178.2 (3)
C7—C8—C9—C10−179.3 (3)C13—C14—C15—C10−0.1 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2A···O1i0.932.503.391 (4)162
C3—H3A···O2ii0.932.523.441 (4)171
C8—H8A···F10.932.212.842 (4)124
  8 in total

1.  Synthetic and biological activity evaluation studies on novel 1,3-diarylpropenones.

Authors:  S Mukherjee; V Kumar; A K Prasad; H G Raj; M E Bracke; C E Olsen; S C Jain; V S Parmar
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Synthesis of benzylideneacetophenones and their inhibition of lipid peroxidation.

Authors:  I S Arty; H Timmerman; M Samhoedi; H van der Goot
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Synthesis of chalcone (3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one): advantage of sonochemical method over conventional method.

Authors:  K J Jarag; D V Pinjari; A B Pandit; G S Shankarling
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.491

5.  (E)-3-[4-(Hex-yloxy)phen-yl]-1-(4-hydroxy-phen-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

Authors:  Ibrahim Abdul Razak; Hoong-Kun Fun; Zainab Ngaini; Norashikin Irdawaty Abd Rahman; Hasnain Hussain
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-05-29

6.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17

8.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.