Literature DB >> 27306548

Sharp and round shapes of seen objects have distinct influences on vowel and consonant articulation.

L Vainio1, M Tiainen2, K Tiippana2, A Rantala2, M Vainio3.   

Abstract

The shape and size-related sound symbolism phenomena assume that, for example, the vowel [i] and the consonant [t] are associated with sharp-shaped and small-sized objects, whereas [ɑ] and [m] are associated with round and large objects. It has been proposed that these phenomena are mostly based on the involvement of articulatory processes in representing shape and size properties of objects. For example, [i] might be associated with sharp and small objects, because it is produced by a specific front-close shape of articulators. Nevertheless, very little work has examined whether these object properties indeed have impact on speech sound vocalization. In the present study, the participants were presented with a sharp- or round-shaped object in a small or large size. They were required to pronounce one out of two meaningless speech units (e.g., [i] or [ɑ]) according to the size or shape of the object. We investigated how a task-irrelevant object property (e.g., the shape when responses are made according to size) influences reaction times, accuracy, intensity, fundamental frequency, and formant 1 and formant 2 of vocalizations. The size did not influence vocal responses but shape did. Specifically, the vowel [i] and consonant [t] were vocalized relatively rapidly when the object was sharp-shaped, whereas [u] and [m] were vocalized relatively rapidly when the object was round-shaped. The study supports the view that the shape-related sound symbolism phenomena might reflect mapping of the perceived shape with the corresponding articulatory gestures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27306548     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0778-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  28 in total

1.  Phonetic symbolism with respect to three dimensions from the semantic differential.

Authors:  D BIRCH; M ERICKSON
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1958-04

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for response priming and conflict regulation in the auditory Simon task.

Authors:  Hartmut Leuthold; Hannes Schröter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The observation of manual grasp actions affects the control of speech: a combined behavioral and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation study.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Riccardo Dalla Volta; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Vision of tongue movements bias auditory speech perception.

Authors:  Alessandro D'Ausilio; Eleonora Bartoli; Laura Maffongelli; Jeffrey James Berry; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Shared processing of planning articulatory gestures and grasping.

Authors:  L Vainio; M Tiainen; K Tiippana; M Vainio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of English: three studies.

Authors:  R D Tarte; L S Barritt
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1971 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  The shape of boubas: sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults.

Authors:  Daphne Maurer; Thanujeni Pathman; Catherine J Mondloch
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2006-05

9.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Preliminary evidence for deficits in multisensory integration in autism spectrum disorders: the mirror neuron hypothesis.

Authors:  Lindsay M Oberman; Vilayanur S Ramachandran
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.083

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Bouba/Kiki in Touch: Associations Between Tactile Perceptual Qualities and Japanese Phonemes.

Authors:  Maki Sakamoto; Junji Watanabe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-12

3.  Assessing sound symbolism: Investigating phonetic forms, visual shapes and letter fonts in an implicit bouba-kiki experimental paradigm.

Authors:  Léa De Carolis; Egidio Marsico; Vincent Arnaud; Christophe Coupé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Visual and Proprioceptive Perceptions Evoke Motion-Sound Symbolism: Different Acceleration Profiles Are Associated With Different Types of Consonants.

Authors:  Kazuko Shinohara; Shigeto Kawahara; Hideyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.