Literature DB >> 25172391

Vision of tongue movements bias auditory speech perception.

Alessandro D'Ausilio1, Eleonora Bartoli2, Laura Maffongelli2, Jeffrey James Berry2, Luciano Fadiga3.   

Abstract

Audiovisual speech perception is likely based on the association between auditory and visual information into stable audiovisual maps. Conflicting audiovisual inputs generate perceptual illusions such as the McGurk effect. Audiovisual mismatch effects could be either driven by the detection of violations in the standard audiovisual statistics or via the sensorimotor reconstruction of the distal articulatory event that generated the audiovisual ambiguity. In order to disambiguate between the two hypotheses we exploit the fact that the tongue is hidden to vision. For this reason, tongue movement encoding can solely be learned via speech production but not via others׳ speech perception alone. Here we asked participants to identify speech sounds while matching or mismatching visual representations of tongue movements which were shown. Vision of congruent tongue movements facilitated auditory speech identification with respect to incongruent trials. This result suggests that direct visual experience of an articulator movement is not necessary for the generation of audiovisual mismatch effects. Furthermore, we suggest that audiovisual integration in speech may benefit from speech production learning.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action perception; Audiovisual speech perception; McGurk; Motor theories; Sensorimotor map; Speech

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25172391     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  6 in total

1.  Sharp and round shapes of seen objects have distinct influences on vowel and consonant articulation.

Authors:  L Vainio; M Tiainen; K Tiippana; A Rantala; M Vainio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-15

2.  Touching lips and hearing fingers: effector-specific congruency between tactile and auditory stimulation modulates N1 amplitude and alpha desynchronization.

Authors:  Guannan Shen; Andrew N Meltzoff; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Functional connectivity within the voice perception network and its behavioural relevance.

Authors:  Virginia Aglieri; Thierry Chaminade; Sylvain Takerkart; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Tool heads prime saccades.

Authors:  Artur Pilacinski; Stella De Haan; Rita Donato; Jorge Almeida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Visual Feedback of Tongue Movement for Novel Speech Sound Learning.

Authors:  William F Katz; Sonya Mehta
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Skilled musicians are not subject to the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Gemma Massetti; Ezia Rizzi; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.