Literature DB >> 19654016

The observation of manual grasp actions affects the control of speech: a combined behavioral and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation study.

Maurizio Gentilucci1, Giovanna Cristina Campione, Riccardo Dalla Volta, Paolo Bernardis.   

Abstract

Does the mirror system affect the control of speech? This issue was addressed in behavioral and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) experiments. In behavioral experiment 1, participants pronounced the syllable /da/ while observing (1) a hand grasping large and small objects with power and precision grasps, respectively, (2) a foot interacting with large and small objects and (3) differently sized objects presented alone. Voice formant 1 was higher when observing power as compared to precision grasp, whereas it remained unaffected by observation of the different types of foot interaction and objects alone. In TMS experiment 2, we stimulated hand motor cortex, while participants observed the two types of grasp. Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) of hand muscles active during the two types of grasp were greater when observing power than precision grasp. In experiments 3-5, TMS was applied to tongue motor cortex of participants silently pronouncing the syllable /da/ and simultaneously observing power and precision grasps, pantomimes of the two types of grasps, and differently sized objects presented alone. Tongue MEPs were greater when observing power than precision grasp either executed or pantomimed. Finally, in TMS experiment 6, the observation of foot interaction with large and small objects did not modulate tongue MEPs. We hypothesized that grasp observation activated motor commands to the mouth as well as to the hand that were congruent with the hand kinematics implemented in the observed type of grasp. The commands to the mouth selectively affected postures of phonation organs and consequently basic features of phonological units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19654016     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

1.  Shared processing of planning articulatory gestures and grasping.

Authors:  L Vainio; M Tiainen; K Tiippana; M Vainio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sharp and round shapes of seen objects have distinct influences on vowel and consonant articulation.

Authors:  L Vainio; M Tiainen; K Tiippana; A Rantala; M Vainio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-15

3.  Behavioral and neural correlates of normal aging effects on motor preparatory mechanisms of speech production and limb movement.

Authors:  Karim Johari; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Roozbeh Behroozmand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of speech on both complementary and synchronous strategies in joint action.

Authors:  Junya Masumoto; Nobuyuki Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Effects of aging on temporal predictive mechanisms of speech and hand motor reaction time.

Authors:  Karim Johari; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Roozbeh Behroozmand
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  The visual size of graspable objects is needed to induce the potentiation of grasping behaviors even with verbal stimuli.

Authors:  Mohamed Halim Harrak; Loïc P Heurley; Nicolas Morgado; Rocco Mennella; Vincent Dru
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-22

8.  Speech in action: degree of hand preference for grasping predicts speech articulation competence in children.

Authors:  Claudia L R Gonzalez; Fangfang Li; Kelly J Mills; Nicole Rosen; Robbin L Gibb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

9.  Up right, not right up: Primacy of verticality in both language and movement.

Authors:  Véronique Boulenger; Livio Finos; Eric Koun; Roméo Salemme; Clément Desoche; Alice C Roy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.473

10.  Concatenation of observed grasp phases with observer's distal movements: a behavioural and TMS study.

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Doriana De Marco; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.