| Literature DB >> 27305349 |
Bożena Urbanek1, Jan Ruta1, Krzysztof Kudryński2, Paweł Ptaszyński1, Artur Klimczak1, Jerzy Krzysztof Wranicz1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to explore the relationship between changes in pulse pressure (PP) and frequency domain heart rate variability (HRV) components caused by left ventricular pacing in patients with implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty patients (mean age 63±8.5 years) with chronic heart failure (CHF) and implanted CRT were enrolled in the study. The simultaneous 5-minute recording of beat-to-beat arterial systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) by Finometer and standard electrocardiogram with CRT switched off (CRT/0) and left ventricular pacing (CRT/LV) was performed. PP (PP=SBP-DBP) and low- and high-frequency (LF and HF) HRV components were calculated, and the relationship between these parameters was analyzed. RESULTS Short-term CRT/LV in comparison to CRT/0 caused a statistically significant increase in the values of PP (P<0.05), LF (P<0.05), and HF (P<0.05). A statistically significant correlation between ΔPP and ΔHF (R=0.7384, P<0.05) was observed. The ΔHF of 6 ms2 during short-term CRT/LV predicted a PP increase of ≥10% with 84.21% sensitivity and 85.71% specificity. CONCLUSIONS During short-term left ventricular pacing in patients with CRT, a significant correlation between ΔPP and ΔHF was observed. ΔHF ≥6 ms2 may serve as a tool in the selection of a suitable site for placement of a left ventricular lead.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27305349 PMCID: PMC4913811 DOI: 10.12659/msm.895489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Baseline clinical characteristic in heart failure patients.
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Sex: men (n, %) | 26 (65%) |
| Age (y) | 63±8.5 |
| NYHA III class (n, %) | 37 (92.5%) |
| LVEF (%) | 25.7±6.6 |
| QRS (ms) | 175±27 |
| Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n,%) | 26 (65%) |
| Ischemic cardiomyopathy (n,%) | 14 (35%) |
| Hyperlipidemia (n,%) | 4 (10%) |
| Hypertension (n,%) | 25 (62.5%) |
| β-Adrenolytic (n,%) | 40 (100%) |
| Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (n,%) | 37 (92%) |
| Aldosterone angiotensin (n,%) | 37 (92.5%) |
| Diuretics (n,%) | 36 (90%) |
| Acetylsalicylic acid (n,%) | 16 (40%) |
| Statins (n,%) | 27 (67.5%) |
NYHA – New York Heart Association;
LVEF– left ventricular ejection fraction.
Value of blood pressure and pulse pressure (PP) in patients with CRT/0 and CRT/LV.
| Parameters | CRT/0 | CRT/LV | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBP (mm Hg) | 113.9±17 | 118.5±17.4 | <0.05 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 68.5±7.1 | 69.6±8.1 | NS |
| PP (mm Hg) | 45.5±13.6 | 49±14 | <0.05 |
SBP – systolic blood pressure;
DBP – diastolic blood pressure;
PP – pulse pressure.
Value of components of heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with CRT/0 and CRT/LV.
| Components of HRV | CRT/0 | CRT/LV | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| LF (ms2) | 16.5 (5.5–34.5) | 20.5 (7–45) | <0.05 |
| HF (ms2) | 13 (4–20) | 22 (7.5–38) | <0.05 |
| LF/HF | 1.5 (0.6–2) | 1.31 (0.6–2) | NS |
LF – low frequency power;
HF – high frequency power;
LF/HF – low-to-high frequency ratio.
Figure 1Power spectral density in HRV: low- (LF) and high- (HF) frequency and low-to-high frequency ratio (LF/HF) with: (A) CRT/0 and (B) CRT/LV.
Figure 2Correlation between change of pulse pressure (ΔPP) and high frequency power (ΔHF).
Figure 3ROC curves showing prognostic ability of ΔLF, ΔHF, and ΔLF/HF in the prediction of significant change ΔPP ≥10% during short-term left ventricular pacing.
Basic values of ROC curves.
| Components of HRV | AUC | P value | 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −95%CI | +95%CI | ||||
| DLF | 0.673 | 0.086 | NS | 0.505 | 0.841 |
| DHF | 0.882 | 0.056 | P <0.05 | 0.773 | 0.991 |
| DLF/HF | 0.548 | 0.093 | NS | 0.366 | 0.730 |
ΔLF – change of low frequency power;
ΔHF – change of high frequency power;
ΔLF/HF – change of low-to high frequency ratio;
AUC – area under curve ROC;
SE – standard error.
Figure 4Relationship between sensitivity and specificity of the method of forecasting an immediate positive response to short-term left ventricular pacing and ΔHF value.
The number of patients with ΔPP ≥10% and ΔHF ≥6 ms2.
| GROUP | DHF <6 ms2 | DHF ≥6 ms2 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPP <10% | N | 18 | 3 | P<0.05 |
| % | 85.71% | 14.29% | ||
| DPP ≥10% | N | 3 | 16 | |
| % | 15.79% | 84.21% | ||
ΔPP – change of pulse pressure;
ΔHF – change of high frequency power.