Literature DB >> 24979451

Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.

Amir Qaseem, Linda L Humphrey, Russell Harris, Melissa Starkey, Thomas D Denberg.   

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on the utility of screening pelvic examination for the detection of pathology in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, adult women.
METHODS: This guideline is based on a systematic review of the published literature in the English language from 1946 through January 2014 identified using MEDLINE and hand-searching. Evaluated outcomes include morbidity; mortality; and harms, including overdiagnosis, overtreatment, diagnostic procedure-related harms, fear, anxiety, embarrassment, pain, and discomfort. The target audience for this guideline includes all clinicians, and the target patient population includes asymptomatic, nonpregnant, adult women. This guideline grades the evidence and recommendations using the ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. RECOMMENDATION: ACP recommends against performing screening pelvic examination in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, adult women (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24979451     DOI: 10.7326/M14-0701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  23 in total

1.  A population-based study of US women's preferred versus usual sources of reproductive health care.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Elizabeth W Patton; Halley P Crissman; Melissa K Zochowski; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Evidence is lacking to support pelvic examinations as a screening tool for non-cervical cancers or other conditions.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2014-09-26

3.  Young women describe the ideal first pelvic examination: Qualitative research using semistructured interviews.

Authors:  Anne Freyens; Mélanie Dejeanne; Elise Fabre; Marie-Eve Rouge-Bugat; Stéphane Oustric
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Cancer Screening and Early Detection in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Jeanne Murphy
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.315

5.  Recommendations on routine screening pelvic examination: Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care adoption of the American College of Physicians guideline.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Connor Gorber; Ainsley Moore; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Recommendations for the routine screening pelvic examination: Could they have a negative effect on physician competence?

Authors:  Roger Ladouceur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Concern is not based on evidence.

Authors:  Ainsley Moore
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  HPV-based cervical cancer screening- facts, fiction, and misperceptions.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 9.  Family Planning and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Nicole Hunt; Mehret Birru Talabi
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  The Effect of Changes in Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines on Chlamydia Testing.

Authors:  Michelle S Naimer; Jeffrey C Kwong; Deepit Bhatia; Rahim Moineddin; Michael Whelan; Michael A Campitelli; Liane Macdonald; Aisha Lofters; Ashleigh Tuite; Tali Bogler; Joanne A Permaul; Warren J McIsaac
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.