| Literature DB >> 27301771 |
Taya Forde1,2, Roman Biek3, Ruth Zadoks3, Matthew L Workentine4, Jeroen De Buck4, Susan Kutz4, Tanja Opriessnig5, Hannah Trewby3, Frank van der Meer4, Karin Orsel4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowledge about how bacterial populations are structured is an important prerequisite for studying their ecology and evolutionary history and facilitates inquiry into host specificity, pathogenicity, geographic dispersal and molecular epidemiology. Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae is an opportunistic pathogen that is currently reemerging in both the swine and poultry industries globally. This bacterium sporadically causes mortalities in captive marine mammals, and has recently been implicated in large-scale wildlife die-offs. However, despite its economic relevance and broad geographic and host distribution, including zoonotic potential, the global diversity, recombination rates, and population structure of this bacterium remain poorly characterized. In this study, we conducted a broad-scale genomic comparison of E. rhusiopathiae based on a diverse collection of isolates in order to address these knowledge gaps.Entities:
Keywords: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae; Genomics; Gram positive bacteria; Homologous recombination; Host specificity; Multi-host pathogen; Population structure; Whole genome sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27301771 PMCID: PMC4906694 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2643-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae pan-genome. Plots were generated in LS-BSR and visualized using PanGP. a Convergence of the core genome with concurrent accumulation of coding sequences in the pan-genome in relation to the number of genomes analyzed. b Number of unique coding sequences for each additional genome analyzed. Publicly available E. rhusiopathiae isolates and de novo assembled isolates whose average depth of coverage was greater than 15X were included in this analysis
Recombination detected in the core genome of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
| Clade 1 | Clade 2 | Clade 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| % of alignment implicated BNG | 0 | 38 | 24 |
| % of alignment implicated Gubbins | 27 | 86 | 58 |
| r/m | 0.96 | 2.18 | 0.55 |
Percentage of the Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae core genome found to have experienced recombination within each clade using BratNextGen (BNG) and Gubbins. Recombination to mutation (r/m) rates for each clade were estimated in Gubbins
Fig. 2Relationship among the species of the genus Erysipelothrix. This phylogenetic tree is based on > 400 conserved bacterial protein sequences, generated using PhyloPhlAn. Members of other genera of the family Erysipelotrichaceae were used as the outgroup for rooting the tree. The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per sequence position
Fig. 3Population structure of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae based on phylogenetic inference. This tree is based on > 400 conserved bacterial protein sequences, generated using PhyloPhlAn. Other Erysipelothrix spp. were used as the outgroup for rooting the tree (clade collapsed). Concentric rings illustrate host species of origin (colored squares) and geographic origin (grey-scale). Arrows indicate isolates whose correct clade association is not resolved between the phylogenetic and chromosome painting approaches. Presence of the surface protective antigen type B (SpaB) gene was exclusive to Clade 1, while the SpaA gene was found among the two other clades and intermediate isolates
Fig. 4Population structure of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae based on in silico chromosome painting. Tree and heat map illustrate the relatedness among E. rhusiopathiae isolates based on chromosome painting using ChromoPainter and model-based clustering using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis in fineSTRUCTURE. The color scale represents the number of ‘chunks’ shared between populations of donors (x-axis) and recipients (y-axis). Population subgroup assignment is shown in Figure S4 in Additional file 2. Arrows indicate isolates whose correct clade association is not resolved between the phylogenic and chromosome painting approaches
Fig. 5Population structure of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae based on network analysis. A phylogenetic network of E. rhusiopathiae was estimated using Neighbor-Net analysis as implemented in SplitsTree. Arrows indicate isolates whose correct clade association is not resolved between the phylogenic and chromosome painting approaches
Fig. 6Relationship among Clade 3 isolates. This maximum likelihood tree (mid-point rooted) was generated using PhyML based on the curated set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found to be outside recombinant segments as determined using Gubbins. Bootstrap values with >70 % support are shown, in addition to support for clusters of isolates by PhyloPhlAn and fineSTRUCTURE