Literature DB >> 27301703

Molecular characterization of Fasciola gigantica in Delhi, India and its phylogenetic relation to the species from South Asian countries.

Kei Hayashi1, Uday K Mohanta, Tambireddy Neeraja, Tadashi Itagaki.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to phylogenetically analyze Fasciola gigantica (F. gigantica) from mainland India and to reveal the expansion history of F. gigantica in the Indian subcontinent. We analyzed 40 Fasciola flukes that were collected from Delhi, in the Indian mainland, and identified them as F. gigantica by using nucleotide analyses of the nuclear phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (pepck) and DNA polymerase delta (pold) genes. Based on the nucleotide sequence of mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1) gene, the flukes had 18 haplotypes. The haplotypes were classified under haplogroup A, which is predominant in the F. gigantica of South Asia. The population genetics of haplogroup A revealed that Delhi population showed higher π value than eastern India population. These results suggest that F. gigantica of haplogroup A might have spread from the west to the east in India along with the artificial migration of the domestic Zebu cattle, Bos indicus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27301703      PMCID: PMC5059385          DOI: 10.1292/jvms.16-0126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Sci        ISSN: 0916-7250            Impact factor:   1.267


Fasciola hepatica (F. hepatica) and Fasciola gigantica (F. gigantica) are well-known causative agents of fasciolosis in livestock and human being [12]. F. hepatica is mainly distributed in temperate zones, whereas F. gigantica is present in tropical zones [20]. Both of these species contain mature spermatozoa in their seminal vesicles for fertilization [19]. In contrast, aspermic Fasciola flukes, which contain few or no spermatozoa in the seminal vesicles, have been reported in Asia [19]. These Fasciola flukes have been identified based on their spermatogenetic status and the nucleotide sequence of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) [1, 9, 14]. However, some Fasciola flukes have shown inconsistent results in these analyses [15]. Recently, novel nuclear single copy markers, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (pepck) and DNA polymerase delta (pold) genes, have been developed for precise discrimination of F. hepatica, F. gigantica and aspermic Fasciola flukes through multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) methods [18]. Molecular phylogenetic analysis and elucidation of propagation route of Fasciola species are important for the epidemic prevention of fasciolosis. F. gigantica populations in Asia have been divided into three haplogroups, A, B and C based on the nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1) gene [6]. Haplogroup A is the predominant population in Nepal, Bangladesh and eastern India on the Indian subcontinent, whereas haplogroups B and C have been distributed mainly in Southeast Asia [6]. Zebu cattle, Bos indicus, which is one of the definitive hosts of Fasciola flukes in Asia, have been domesticated in the Indus Valley, in the western area of the Indian subcontinent, and then spread throughout the subcontinent [5]. From those findings, we hypothesized that F. gigantica of haplogroup A originated in the Indus Valley, and the anthropogenic movements of domesticated Zebu cattle might have been involved in the spreading of the haplogroup [6]. In order to verify this hypothesis and to reveal the expansion history of F. gigantica throughout the Indian subcontinent, we analyzed Fasciola flukes collected from mainland India, which occupies a majority of the Indian subcontinent, using molecular phylogenetic analysis. A total of 40 Fasciola flukes (1–8 flukes per host) were collected from the bile ducts of 11 buffalos at slaughterhouses in Delhi, India in December 2014 (Table 1). The flukes were fixed in 70% ethanol and transported to the laboratory for further studies. Their seminal vesicles were removed under a stereomicroscope, stained with hematoxylin-carmine solution and then observed under an optical microscope to determine the existence of sperm [19].
Table 1.

The mitochondrial nad1 haplotype and spermatic status in seminal vesicles of Fasciola gigantica from Delhi

HaplotypeAccession no.Number of flukesSperm in seminal vesicles
ND1-IN1LC12831415+
ND1-IN2LC1283151+
ND1-IN3LC1283161+
ND1-IN4LC1283171+
ND1-IN5LC1283181+
ND1-IN6LC1283193+
ND1-IN7LC1283203+
ND1-IN8LC1283211+
ND1-IN9LC1283222+
ND1-IN10LC1283231+
ND1-IN11LC1283242+
ND1-IN12LC1283251+
ND1-IN12LC1283251-
ND1-IN13LC1283262+
ND1-IN14LC1283271+
ND1-IN15LC1283281+
ND1-IN16LC1283291+
ND1-IN17LC1283301+
ND1-IN18LC1287511+
Total40
Total DNA was extracted from each fluke with a High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −20°C until use. The flukes were identified on the basis of nuclear ITS1, pepck and pold. The ITS1 and pold were analyzed by a PCR-RFLP method. Briefly, PCR amplicons were obtained with the primer sets: ITS1-F and ITS1-R for ITS1 [9] and Fasciola-pold-F1 and Fasciola-pold-R1 for pold [18], and were digested using restriction enzymes RsaI for ITS1 and AluI for pold. The fragment patterns of the amplicons were distinguished on 1.8% agarose gels. The pepck region was amplified by a multiplex PCR with the primers, Fh-pepck-F, Fg-pepck-F and Fcmn-pepck-R, and the fragment patterns were distinguished on 1.0% agarose gels [18]. The nad1 fragment was amplified with the primers, Ita 10 and Ita 2 [9], and directly sequenced in both directions with Ita 10 and Ita 2 primers using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequence Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, U.S.A.) on an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The resulting sequences were initially assembled using ATGC ver. 6.0.3 (Genetyx Co., Tokyo, Japan), and the haplotypes were distinguished using GENETYX ver. 10 (Genetyx Co.). The median-joining network that was inferred from the nad1 haplotypes was generated using Network 4.6.1.2 software [2]. The frequencies of the reference haplotypes were cited from our previous studies in Japan [7, 9], South Korea [10], China [16], Vietnam [11], Thailand [4], Myanmar [8], eastern India [6], Bangladesh [15] and Nepal [17]. The frequency data of 129 Fasciola flukes that were collected in China remain unpublished. For the F. gigantica populations belonging to haplogroup A, haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) were calculated using DnaSP 5.1 [13]. A total of 39 Fasciola flukes held plenty of sperm in their seminal vesicles (spermic). The flukes displayed the F. gigantica fragment pattern (Fg) in ITS1, pepck and pold. Thus, these flukes were identified as F. gigantica. The remaining one fluke did not contain any sperm in the seminal vesicle (aspermic). However, the fluke also displayed Fg in ITS1, pepck and pold, and therefore, the fluke was identified as F. gigantica as well (Table 1). Hence, all of the Fasciola flukes analyzed in this study were identified as F. gigantica on the basis of their molecular markers [18]. No fluke displayed the hybrid fragment pattern between F. hepatica and F. gigantica (Fh/Fg), which is a recognizable characteristic of aspermic Fasciola flukes. The partial nucleotide sequences (535 bp) of the nad1 region displayed 19 substitution sites yielding 18 haplotypes, ND1-IN1 to ND1-IN18 (GenBank accession numbers: LC128314–LC128330 and LC128751) (Table 1). All of the nad1 haplotypes belonged to F. gigantica haplogroup A, which has been primarily detected on the Indian subcontinent. No haplotype was included in the haplogroup of aspermic Fasciola flukes (Fig. 1). The predominant haplotype of F. gigantica from Delhi was ND1-IN1, which had a nucleotide sequence identical to the haplotypes of F. gigantica from Nepal (Fg-ND1-N1) [16], Bangladesh (Fg-ND1-Bd9) [15], Myanmar (ND1-M15) [7], Thailand (ND1-T13) [3] and eastern India (ND1-E6) [5]. ND1-IN2 to ND1-IN18 were colony haplotypes, which had one to three nucleotide substitutions from ND1-IN1 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

A median-joining network on the basis of mitochondrial nad1 haplotypes of Fasciola gigantica and aspermic Fasciola flukes. Fasciola flukes from Delhi are shown in black. A circle indicates a haplotype. Haplotype codes are labeled within or adjacent to the circles. The prefix of each haplotype code, ND1-, used in Table 1 was omitted. Numbers on each circle and node indicate the number of flukes and substitution sites, respectively. Circles and nodes without labeled numbers indicate that the number is only one. Small, dark circles on the node represent median vectors. A thick dashed line separates F. gigantica from aspermic Fasciola sp., and thin dashed lines divide the three haplogroups of F. gigantica.

A median-joining network on the basis of mitochondrial nad1 haplotypes of Fasciola gigantica and aspermic Fasciola flukes. Fasciola flukes from Delhi are shown in black. A circle indicates a haplotype. Haplotype codes are labeled within or adjacent to the circles. The prefix of each haplotype code, ND1-, used in Table 1 was omitted. Numbers on each circle and node indicate the number of flukes and substitution sites, respectively. Circles and nodes without labeled numbers indicate that the number is only one. Small, dark circles on the node represent median vectors. A thick dashed line separates F. gigantica from aspermic Fasciola sp., and thin dashed lines divide the three haplogroups of F. gigantica. No aspermic Fasciola flukes were detected among the samples collected in Delhi, though aspermic Fasciola flukes have been reported in Nepal, Bangladesh and eastern India on the Indian subcontinent [6, 15, 17]. Nad1 haplotype of one aspermic fluke, which displayed Fg fragment patterns in the ITS1, pepck and pold, was also included in the F. gigantica haplogroup A, not in the haplogroup of aspermic Fasciola flukes. Therefore, the fluke is considered F. gigantica that may have lost spermatogenetic ability due to aging or other unknown causes. F. gigantica with no sperm in their seminal vesicles was also detected in Myanmar [8], Bangladesh [15] and eastern India [6]. Aspermic Fasciola flukes were predominant in Bangladesh (86.0%) [15] and Nepal (75.3%) [17], while the prevalence was low in eastern India (24.8%) [6]. Aspermic Fasciola flukes are thought to have originated in China and have been introduced into these countries [15,16,17], and thus, these results suggest that the flukes have not yet dispersed extensively throughout India. However, to verify this phenomenon, further analysis of Fasciola flukes from other localities in India is required. All of the nad1 haplotypes of F. gigantica collected from Delhi were categorized into haplogroup A. Similarly, F. gigantica haplotypes from the Indian subcontinent, Nepal [17], Bangladesh [15] and eastern India [6] also belonged to haplogroup A. In contrast, the haplotypes collected from Southeast Asia, Thailand and Myanmar belonged to haplogroups B and C in addition to haplogroup A [4, 8]. Moreover, the π value of haplogroup A was the highest in the Nepal (0.00366), followed by Bangladesh (0.00362), Delhi (0.00255), eastern India (0.00242) and Myanmar (0.00225) populations (Table 2). Genetic diversity in the latest population generally decreases with distance from its geographical origin [3, 5, 21]. These π values suggest that F. gigantica populations of haplogroup A might have been spread from the west to the east in India. Additionally, zebu cattle have been domesticated in the Indus Valley and then spread throughout Indian subcontinent from the west to the east [5], and therefore, the F. gigantica populations in India might have spread along with the anthropogenic movement of the ruminant [6, 15, 17]. However, the π value of the Delhi population was smaller than that of Nepal and Bangladesh, although Delhi is located in the west than the two countries. This inconsistency might be caused by using Fasciola samples collected from a single locality (Delhi) in vast mainland of India. Moreover, the number and geographical source of the flukes analyzed in this study are inadequate to confirm the hypothesis. Therefore, further phylogenetic studies using additional Fasciola flukes from mainland India are required to understand the spreading route of F. gigantica.
Table 2.

Diversity indices for F. gigantica populations of the haplogroup a on the basis of the sequence of mitochondrial nad1 gene

PopulationsNShHd ± SDπ
Delhi4019180.853 ± 0.0520.00255
Eastern India [6]9132320.751 ± 0.0500.00242
Nepal [18]2016100.758 ± 0.1010.00366
Bangladesh [16]2015100.832 ± 0.0750.00362
Myanmar [8]13760.641 ± 0.1500.00225

N: number of flukes used for calculation, S: number of substitution sites, h: number of haplotypes, Hd: haplotype diversity, SD: standard deviation, π: nucleotide diversity. Numbers in brackets represent those of the references.

N: number of flukes used for calculation, S: number of substitution sites, h: number of haplotypes, Hd: haplotype diversity, SD: standard deviation, π: nucleotide diversity. Numbers in brackets represent those of the references.
  20 in total

1.  Novel methods for the molecular discrimination of Fasciola spp. on the basis of nuclear protein-coding genes.

Authors:  Takuya Shoriki; Madoka Ichikawa-Seki; Keisuke Suganuma; Ikunori Naito; Kei Hayashi; Minoru Nakao; Junya Aita; Uday Kumar Mohanta; Noboru Inoue; Kenji Murakami; Tadashi Itagaki
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Genetic evidence for Near-Eastern origins of European cattle.

Authors:  C S Troy; D E MacHugh; J F Bailey; D A Magee; R T Loftus; P Cunningham; A T Chamberlain; B C Sykes; D G Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Molecular characterization of parthenogenic Fasciola sp. in Korea on the basis of DNA sequences of ribosomal ITS1 and mitochondrial NDI gene.

Authors:  Tadashi Itagaki; Masayuki Kikawa; Kunio Terasaki; Toshiyuki Shibahara; Koichi Fukuda
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.267

4.  Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Fasciola flukes from eastern India.

Authors:  Kei Hayashi; Madoka Ichikawa-Seki; Uday Kumar Mohanta; T Shantikumar Singh; Takuya Shoriki; Hiromu Sugiyama; Tadashi Itagaki
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Molecular phylogenetic identification of Fasciola flukes in Nepal.

Authors:  Takuya Shoriki; Madoka Ichikawa-Seki; Bhuminand Devkota; Hari B Rana; Shiva P Devkota; Sudeep K Humagain; Tadashi Itagaki
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Characteristics and molecular phylogeny of Fasciola flukes from Bangladesh, determined based on spermatogenesis and nuclear and mitochondrial DNA analyses.

Authors:  Uday Kumar Mohanta; Madoka Ichikawa-Seki; Takuya Shoriki; Ken Katakura; Tadashi Itagaki
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Comparison of the second internal transcribed spacer (ribosomal DNA) from populations and species of Fasciolidae (Digenea).

Authors:  R D Adlard; S C Barker; D Blair; T H Cribb
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.981

8.  Molecular characterization of Fasciola hepatica, Fasciola gigantica, and aspermic Fasciola sp. in China based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Mao Peng; Mie Ichinomiya; Maiko Ohtori; Madoka Ichikawa; Toshiyuki Shibahara; Tadashi Itagaki
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Identification of Fasciola flukes in Thailand based on their spermatogenesis and nuclear ribosomal DNA, and their intraspecific relationships based on mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Pannigan Chaichanasak; Madoka Ichikawa; Prasert Sobhon; Tadashi Itagaki
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 10.  Emerging foodborne trematodiasis.

Authors:  Jennifer Keiser; Jürg Utzinger
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  3 in total

1.  New insight into genetic variation and haplotype diversity of Fasciola hepatica from Algeria.

Authors:  Linda Chougar; Nabil Amor; Sarra Farjallah; Khaled Harhoura; Miriem Aissi; Abdulaziz N Alagaili; Paolo Merella
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Identity of Fasciola spp. in sheep in Egypt.

Authors:  Said Amer; Ahmed ElKhatam; Shereif Zidan; Yaoyu Feng; Lihua Xiao
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Immunodiagnosis of cattle fascioliasis using a 27 kDa Fasciola gigantica antigen.

Authors:  Mohamed J Saadh; Samer A Tanash; Ammar M Almaaytah; Issam J Sa'adeh; Saed M Aldalaen; Khawla D Al-Hamaideh
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-08-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.