| Literature DB >> 34566326 |
Mohamed J Saadh1, Samer A Tanash1, Ammar M Almaaytah1,2, Issam J Sa'adeh3, Saed M Aldalaen4, Khawla D Al-Hamaideh5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnosis of fascioliasis depends on clinical symptoms and routine laboratory tests. Recently, antibodies and circulating antigens of Fasciola were used for detecting active infections. Therefore, this study aimed to identify Fasciola gigantica antigens in the sera of infected cattle using Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for an accurate diagnosis of cattle infected with F. gigantica.Entities:
Keywords: Fasciola gigantica; antigen; fascioliasis; immunodiagnostics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34566326 PMCID: PMC8448643 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.2097-2101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1(a) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. (b) Western blotting for different antigenic sources of Fasciola gigantica and Paramphistomum cervi using immunoglobulin G rabbit anti-Fasciola antibody. Lane 1: F. gigantica adult worm antigen preparation; lane 2: Excretory/secretory antigen products from F. gigantica; lane 3: P. cervi antigenic extract.
Figure-2Western blot of serum samples from Fasciola-infected and non-infected cattle to detect circulating Fasciola antigen. Lane 1: Fasciola gigantica worm antigen preparations (F. gigantica); lane 2: Serum sample from non-infected cattle; lane 3: Serum sample from cattle infected with Paramphistomum cervi; lane 4: Serum sample from cattle infected with Strongylids; lane 5-8: Serum samples from cattle infected with F. gigantica.
Figure-3Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnostics of Fasciola gigantica against all samples from cattle (area under curve=0.89; p<0.0001).
Figure-4Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnostics of Fasciola gigantica versus healthy cattle (area under curve=0.98; p<0.0001).