| Literature DB >> 27301420 |
Katsunori Yanagawa1, Atsushi Tani, Naoya Yamamoto, Akihiro Hachikubo, Akihiro Kano, Ryo Matsumoto, Yohey Suzuki.
Abstract
The biological flux and lifetime of methanol in anoxic marine sediments are largely unknown. We herein reported, for the first time, quantitative methanol removal rates in subsurface sediments. Anaerobic incubation experiments with radiotracers showed high rates of microbial methanol consumption. Notably, methanol oxidation to CO2 surpassed methanol assimilation and methanogenesis from CO2/H2 and methanol. Nevertheless, a significant decrease in methanol was not observed after the incubation, and this was attributed to the microbial production of methanol in parallel with its consumption. These results suggest that microbial reactions play an important role in the sources and sinks of methanol in subseafloor sediments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27301420 PMCID: PMC4912158 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME15204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Fig. 1Depth profiles of pore water geochemistry, potential microbial activities, turnover rates, numbers of microbial cells, and prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene phylotype compositions in MD3301 and 3304 cores. The values below the detection limit for microbial activities and the turnover rates are plotted on the left axes. The relative abundances of phylum/class-level phylotypes are shown in each column diagram in the left graph. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of phylotypes. The concentrations of methane and sulfate and the microbial community compositions were originally reported elsewhere (26).
Fig. 2Potential rates of methanol production and consumption. (A) Absolute concentrations in pore water methanol before and after a three-month incubation. The changes measured in methanol concentration were higher than those expected from the sum of microbial methanol consumption activities (anaerobic methanol oxidation, methanol assimilation, and methanogenesis from methanol), which were determined based on the radiotracer experiments in Fig. 1. (B) Comparison of potential methanol consumption rates and production rates. Potential methanol production rates were estimated from the difference between the expected values from methanol consumption activities and the changes measured in methanol concentration after the incubation.