Oleg Baranov1, Melanie Kahle1,2, Carolyn F Deacon3, Jens J Holst3, Michael A Nauck4,5. 1. Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg, Bad Lauterberg im Harz, Germany. 2. Division of Diabetology, Medical Department I, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. 3. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg, Bad Lauterberg im Harz, Germany. michael.nauck@rub.de. 5. Division of Diabetology, Medical Department I, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. michael.nauck@rub.de.
Abstract
AIM: To compare directly the clinical effects of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes, with a special emphasis on incretin hormones and L-cell feedback inhibition induced by dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-4) inhibition. METHODS: A total of 24 patients (12 on a diet/exercise regimen, 12 onmetformin) were treated, in randomized order, for 7-9 days, with either vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily = 100 mg/d), sitagliptin (100 mg once daily in those on diet, 50 mg twice daily in those on metformin treatment = 100 mg/d) or placebo (twice daily). A mixed-meal test was performed. RESULTS:Intact glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations were doubled by both DPP-4 inhibitors. Meal-related total GLP-1 responses were reduced by vildagliptin and sitagliptin treatment alike in the majority of patients (vildagliptin: p = 0.0005; sitagliptin: p = 0.019), but with substantial inter-individual variation. L-cell feedback appeared to be more pronounced in those whose intact GLP-1 relative to total GLP-1 increased more, and who had greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose after DPP-4 inhibition. K-cell feedback inhibition overall was not significant. There were no differences in any of the clinical variables (glycaemia, insulin and glucagon secretory responses) between vildagliptin and sitagliptin treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Vildagliptin and sitagliptin affected incretin hormones, glucose concentrations, insulin and glucagon secretion in a similar manner. Inter-individual variations in L-cell feedback inhibition may indicate heterogeneity in the clinical response to DPP-4 inhibition.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To compare directly the clinical effects of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes, with a special emphasis on incretin hormones and L-cell feedback inhibition induced by dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-4) inhibition. METHODS: A total of 24 patients (12 on a diet/exercise regimen, 12 on metformin) were treated, in randomized order, for 7-9 days, with either vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily = 100 mg/d), sitagliptin (100 mg once daily in those on diet, 50 mg twice daily in those on metformin treatment = 100 mg/d) or placebo (twice daily). A mixed-meal test was performed. RESULTS: Intact glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations were doubled by both DPP-4 inhibitors. Meal-related total GLP-1 responses were reduced by vildagliptin and sitagliptin treatment alike in the majority of patients (vildagliptin: p = 0.0005; sitagliptin: p = 0.019), but with substantial inter-individual variation. L-cell feedback appeared to be more pronounced in those whose intact GLP-1 relative to total GLP-1 increased more, and who had greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose after DPP-4 inhibition. K-cell feedback inhibition overall was not significant. There were no differences in any of the clinical variables (glycaemia, insulin and glucagon secretory responses) between vildagliptin and sitagliptin treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Vildagliptin and sitagliptin affected incretin hormones, glucose concentrations, insulin and glucagon secretion in a similar manner. Inter-individual variations in L-cell feedback inhibition may indicate heterogeneity in the clinical response to DPP-4 inhibition.
Authors: Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen; Rune E Kuhre; Daniel Hornburg; Christian Z Jensen; Mads Hornum; Carsten Dirksen; Maria Svane; Lærke S Gasbjerg; Nils B Jørgensen; Maria N Gabe; Emilie Balk-Møller; Reidar Albrechtsen; Marie Winther-Sørensen; Katrine D Galsgaard; Felix Meissner; Tina Jorsal; Asger Lund; Tina Vilsbøll; Rasmus Eliasen; Kirstine N Bojsen-Møller; Thomas Idorn; Carolyn F Deacon; Filip K Knop; Mette M Rosenkilde; Bolette Hartmann; Bo Feldt-Rasmussen; Matthias Mann; Sten Madsbad; Jens J Holst Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 9.423