Literature DB >> 2729930

Pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered cefmetazole and cefoxitin and effects of probenecid on cefmetazole elimination.

H Ko1, K S Cathcart, D L Griffith, G R Peters, W J Adams.   

Abstract

Sixteen healthy male volunteers participated in a randomized, balanced, three-way crossover study comparing the pharmacokinetics of cefmetazole, cefoxitin, and cefmetazole with probenecid pretreatment. Single 2-g doses of cefmetazole sodium and cefoxitin sodium were given intravenously as a 5-min infusion. Concentrations of cefmetazole and cefoxitin were determined by using a specific semiautomated high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Concentration-time profiles of cefmetazole and cefoxitin declined in a biexponential manner from peak levels. Compared with cefoxitin, cefmetazole had a significantly (P less than 0.05) higher mean (+/- standard error of the mean) peak concentration in serum (290 +/- 11 versus 244 +/- 10 micrograms/ml), a longer terminal disposition half-life (1.50 +/- 0.14 versus 0.81 +/- 0.04 h), lower systemic clearance (111.7 +/- 4.7 versus 279 +/- 12 ml/min) and renal clearance (78.7 +/- 4.3 versus 221 +/- 14 ml/min) of intact drug, and a slightly smaller steady-state volume of distribution (10.3 +/- 0.21 versus 12.8 +/- 0.48 liters). Mean recoveries of cefmetazole and cefoxitin in urine were approximately 71 and 77%, respectively. Pretreatment of volunteers with probenecid (1 g orally) significantly (P less than 0.05) increased concentrations of cefmetazole in serum 1 h after drug administration without significantly increasing maximum concentrations in serum. Mean areas under the concentration-time curve (466 +/- 27 versus 295 +/- 13 micrograms.h/ml) and terminal disposition half-lives (2.27 +/- 0.13 versus 1.50 +/- 0.14 h) of cefmetazole increased. Systemic clearance (72.1 +/- 4.0 versus 111.7 +/- 4.7 ml/min) and renal clearance (47.4 +/- 4.0 versus 78.7 +/- 4.3 ml/min) of intact antibiotic decreased. Mean recoveries (65.9 +/- 3.7 versus 71.0 +/- 3.2%) of intact cefmetazole in urine were not significantly (P > 0.05) different. Elimination of cefmetazole in urine was also significantly prolonged by probenecid, with substantial concentrations of cefmetazole (>/= 20 micrograms/ml) found in the 12- to 24-h urine collection for 14 to 16 volunteers. The results show that cefmetazole remains at clinically relevant concentrations (1 to 2 micrograms/ml) approximately twice as long as cefoxitin, that serum cefmetazole can be maintained longer at clinically significant concentrations with preadministration of probenecid, and that cefmetazole is partially eliminated by renal tubule secretion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2729930      PMCID: PMC171493          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.33.3.356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  9 in total

1.  Antimicrobial activity of cefmetazole (CS-1170) and recommendations for susceptibility testing by disk diffusion, dilution, and anaerobic methods.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; P C Fuchs; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparative clinical pharmacology of intravenous cefoxitin and cephalothin.

Authors:  P F Sonneville; R R Kartodirdjo; H Skeggs; A E Till; C M Martin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1976-03-22       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  A new semisynthetic 7alpha-methoxycephalosporin, CS-1170: 7beta-((cyanomethyl)thio)acetamido)-7alpha-methoxy-3-((1-methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)thio)methyl)-3-cephem-4-carboxylic acid.

Authors:  H Nakao; H Yanagisawa; B Shimizu; M Kaneko; M Nagano
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin sodium.

Authors:  J J Schrogie; R O Davies; K C Yeh; D Rogers; G I Holmes; H Skeggs; C M Martin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Pharmacokinetics of cefmetazole administered intramuscularly and intravenously to healthy adults.

Authors:  J Rodriguez-Barbero; E L Mariño; A Dominguez-Gil
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effects of rate of infusion and probenecid on serum levels, renal excretion, and tolerance of intravenous doses of cefoxitin in humans: comparison with cephalothin.

Authors:  C S Goodwin; E B Raftery; A D Goldberg; H Skeggs; A E Till; C M Martin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Pharmacokinetics of cefmetazole in normal subjects and in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  M Ohkawa; M Orito; T Sugata; M Shimamura; M Sawaki; E Nakashita; K Kuroda; K Sasahara
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Concentrations of cefmetazole in plasma and tissue resulting from peri-incisional administration before appendectomy.

Authors:  J R Rodríguez; E L Mariño; M J Otero; J R Commes; J Garcia; J M Rodriguez; F Lozano; A Dominguez-Gil; A G Alonso
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of probenecid.

Authors:  R F Cunningham; Z H Israili; P G Dayton
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

  9 in total
  14 in total

1.  Cefoxitin Plasma and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Concentration in Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Luigi Brunetti; Leonid Kagan; Glenn Forrester; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hongxia Lin; Steven Buyske; Ronald G Nahass
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of cefmetazole in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

Authors:  M T Borin; G R Peters; T C Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Disposition of cefmetazole in healthy volunteers and patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  C E Halstenson; D R Guay; J A Opsahl; C A Hirata; L S Olanoff; E Novak; H Ko; K S Cathcart; G R Matzke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamic model for β-lactam regimens used in surgical prophylaxis: model-based evaluation of standard dosing regimens.

Authors:  XiangQing Song; MingHui Long
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-08-16

5.  Cefoxitin continuous infusion for lung infection caused by the Mycobacterium abscessus group.

Authors:  Christopher A Czaja; Adrah Levin; Majid Moridani; Jessica L Krank; Douglas Curran-Everett; Peter L Anderson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of prophylactic cefoxitin in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Arantxazu Isla; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Ignacio López de Tejada; Silvia Vázquez; Andrés Canut; Jesús Muriel López; María Ángeles Solinís; Alicia Rodríguez Gascón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Anton Ivanyuk; Françoise Livio; Jérôme Biollaz; Thierry Buclin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Cephalosporin-probenecid drug interactions.

Authors:  G R Brown
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Pierre Moine; Scott W Mueller; Jonathan A Schoen; Kevin B Rothchild; Douglas N Fish
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacokinetics of single-dose cefmetazole following intramuscular administration of cefmetazole sodium to healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  H Ko; E Novak; G R Peters; W M Bothwell; J D Hosley; S K Closson; W J Adams
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.