Literature DB >> 27298522

Permanent Sterilisation to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Is a Paradigm Shift Necessary?

S Shantha Kumari1.   

Abstract

The concept of family planning originated as birth control in 1912 to control the size of the family and prevent unplanned pregnancies transformed to family welfare and later on expanded its horizons to reproductive and child health (RCH). A wide spectrum of choices both for male and female, temporary and permanent, have been developed and offered. Developed world having stabilised population faces problem with teenage and adolescent pregnancies. Developing nations are still struggling to stabilise population and traditionally depend on permanent female sterilisation as a major method of contraception. Lot of unmet need is seen in young recently married women, post-delivery, post-abortal states. Long-acting reversible contraception which includes intrauterine device, IUD, and implants has re-emerged strongly as a first choice of contraception for women of all ages including unmarried teenage pregnancies. They are highly efficient with failure rates equivalent or better than permanent methods, cost-effective, reversible, and have the potential to replace permanent sterilisation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CU-T 380A; Implants; LARC; Sterilisation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27298522      PMCID: PMC4870672          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-016-0866-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  6 in total

1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Colleen McNicholas; Jennifer Mullersman; Christina M Buckel; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The contraceptive CHOICE project round up: what we did and what we learned.

Authors:  Colleen McNicholas; Tessa Madden; Gina Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Jenna Jerman; Megan L Kavanaugh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Post-sterilization regrets in Indian women.

Authors:  Neena Malhotra; Charu Chanana; Pradeep Garg
Journal:  Indian J Med Sci       Date:  2007-04

Review 6.  Priority strategies for India's family planning programme.

Authors:  Saroj Pachauri
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.375

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Critical Factors Influencing the Acceptability of Post-placental Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Study in Six Public/Private Institutes in India.

Authors:  Hema Divakar; Ajey Bhardwaj; Chittaranjan Narhari Purandare; Thelma Sequeira; Pooja Sanghvi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-05-10

2.  Assessment of need for limiting family after two children: A cross-sectional study from a Northern State of India.

Authors:  Rajesh Kumar Singh; Amandeep Kaur
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-02

3.  Determinants of long acting reversible contraception utilization in Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based case control study.

Authors:  Kiros Terefe Gashaye; Adino Tesfahun Tsegaye; Solomon Mekonnen Abebe; Mulat Adefris Woldetsadik; Tadesse Awoke Ayele; Zelalem Mengistu Gashaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.