| Literature DB >> 27298380 |
Clémence Chaintreuil1, Ronan Rivallan2, David J Bertioli3, Christophe Klopp4, Jérôme Gouzy5, Brigitte Courtois2, Philippe Leleux6, Guillaume Martin2, Jean-François Rami2, Djamel Gully1, Hugues Parrinello7, Dany Séverac7, Delphine Patrel8, Joël Fardoux1, William Ribière9, Marc Boursot1, Fabienne Cartieaux1, Pierre Czernic1, Pascal Ratet10, Pierre Mournet2, Eric Giraud1, Jean-François Arrighi11.
Abstract
Aeschynomene evenia has emerged as a new model legume for the deciphering of the molecular mechanisms of an alternative symbiotic process that is independent of the Nod factors. Whereas most of the research on nitrogen-fixing symbiosis, legume genetics and genomics has so far focused on Galegoid and Phaseolid legumes, A. evenia falls in the more basal and understudied Dalbergioid clade along with peanut (Arachis hypogaea). To provide insights into the symbiotic genes content and the structure of the A. evenia genome, we established a gene-based genetic map for this species. Firstly, an RNAseq analysis was performed on the two parental lines selected to generate a F2 mapping population. The transcriptomic data were used to develop molecular markers and they allowed the identification of most symbiotic genes. The resulting map comprised 364 markers arranged in 10 linkage groups (2n = 20). A comparative analysis with the sequenced genomes of Arachis duranensis and A. ipaensis, the diploid ancestors of peanut, indicated blocks of conserved macrosynteny. Altogether, these results provided important clues regarding the evolution of symbiotic genes in a Nod factor-independent context. They provide a basis for a genome sequencing project and pave the way for forward genetic analysis of symbiosis in A. evenia.Entities:
Keywords: Aeschynomene evenia; comparative genomics; genetic map; legume; symbiosis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27298380 PMCID: PMC4991833 DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsw020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: DNA Res ISSN: 1340-2838 Impact factor: 4.458
Figure 1Phylogeny of the Papilionoid lineage and evolution of the symbiotic infection process. The tree is a simplified representation with triangle representing the major clades and the two subclades of the Galegoids: the Robinoids and the plastid DNA inverted repeat-lacking clade (IRLC). Known divergence times are indicated in MYA (million years ago) for some nodes (circles) and notable species are listed for each clade. Symbiotic infection processes encountered in the different clades are reported, excepted for the basal clades for which occurrence of nodulation is restricted to few understudied species. Note that Aeschynomene is the only legume genus where a Nod-independent symbiotic infection process (*NI*) has been reported for several species, including A. evenia. Phylogeny and drawings are adaptations, date estimates and nodulation properties come from previous publications.
Figure 2Differentiation within the A. evenia species and its use for genomic and genetic studies. (A) Schematic phylogeny depicting the genetic differentiation within the A. evenia species and the relationships with Arachis sp., Dash lines connect the tetraploid A. hypogaea to its most probable diploid genome donors A. duranensis and A. ipaensis. Divergence times at certain nodes (circles) were estimated using a relaxed molecular clock (Table 3). (B) Phenotypic patterns which distinguish CIAT22838 and CIAT8232 lines and impact on the F1 hybrid obtained by cross-pollination: plant habit (ramified or not), time of flower opening (early and late), flower shapes (standard shape and dark throat indicated by an arrow), pod production. Bars = 5 mm.
Characteristics of the Aeschynomene evenia genetic map
| LG | Total length (cM) | Number of loci | Number of markers | Average distance (cM) | Min–max distances (cM) | Distorted markers (P < 0.001) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AeLG1 | 107.1 | 25 | 29 | 4.3 | 0–13.5 | 0 |
| AeLG2 | 98.1 | 13 | 13 | 7.5 | 0–22.1 | 10 |
| AeLG3 | 113.1 | 44 | 49 | 2.6 | 0–25.1 | 0 |
| AeLG4 | 105.2 | 38 | 46 | 2.8 | 0–13.3 | 0 |
| AeLG5 | 124.7 | 42 | 48 | 3.0 | 0–19.8 | 0 |
| AeLG6 | 130.8 | 37 | 41 | 3.5 | 0–21.8 | 0 |
| AeLG7 | 83.6 | 31 | 34 | 2.7 | 0–10.7 | 0 |
| AeLG8 | 96.2 | 37 | 43 | 2.6 | 0–12.6 | 0 |
| AeLG9 | 95.3 | 33 | 36 | 2.9 | 0–13.9 | 15 |
| AeLG10 | 82 | 24 | 25 | 3.4 | 0–20.6 | 0 |
Overview of the sequencing and assembly
| Nucleotide length (pb) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bahia CIAT8232 | Mbao CIAT22838 | |
| 150–500 | 21,020 | 20,269 |
| 501–1,000 | 10,109 | 9,990 |
| 1,001–2,000 | 13,127 | 13,216 |
| 2,001–3,000 | 5,673 | 5,561 |
| 3,001–4,000 | 1,767 | 1,769 |
| 4,001–5,000 | 570 | 578 |
| >5,000 | 382 | 379 |
| Raw reads | 68,945,277 | 75,745,315 |
| Filtered reads | 65,865,857 | 72,387,963 |
| Number of contigs | 51,763 | 52,648 |
| min length (bp) | 150 | 150 |
| max length (bp) | 16,895 | 16,886 |
| N50 (bp) | 1,799 | 1,803 |
| Average length (bp) | 1,092 | 1,082 |
| Total nucleotide length (bp) | 56,526,002 | 57,007,824 |
Figure 3Assessment of assembly quality and gene coverage for the Illumina transcriptomes. (A) Distribution of mapped reads within the assembled contigs for the Illumina transcriptomes of the two parental genotypes Bahia and Mbao. B, Comparison of contig length between hit and no-hit contigs from the Mbao transcriptome assembly after tBLASTX analysis with the protein database of A. ipaensis. C, Comparison of Mbao contigs to putative orthologous A. ipaensis sequences by evaluating the % of alignment of corresponding coding sequences.
Figure 4Simplified model for the symbiotic signaling pathway in legumes. Symbiotic genes identified in M. truncatula and L. japonicus are listed and classified in main symbiotic functions., Putative orthologs were searched in the Illumina transcriptome of the two mapping parents. Those that could not be identified are between parentheses. Genes highlighted in bold characters are those which were demonstrated to be involved in the Nod-independent nodulation process in A. evenia.,
Distribution of repeat types and number of repeats within the Mbao library
| Repeat type | Number of repeat units | Total | % | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | >10 | |||
| Di | – | – | – | 64 | 105 | 95 | 107 | 68 | 120 | 559 | 35.9 |
| Tri | – | 68 | 141 | 181 | 132 | 93 | 49 | 29 | 31 | 724 | 46.4 |
| Tetra | 12 | 58 | 53 | 29 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | – | 168 | 10.8 |
| Penta | 25 | 51 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | 106 | 6.8 |
| Hexa | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 0.1 |
Figure 5Genetic map of Aeschynomene evenia. The genetic map based on F2 mapping population CIAT22838 × CIAT8232 is comprised of 364 gene based markers including SSR, INDEL and SNP (KASP) markers. The ten linkage groups are designated as AeLG1-AeLG10. The code to the right of the linkage groups refers to the marker or symbiotic gene name. The numbers to the left of the linkage groups refers to the genetic distances (Kosambi cM) from the top.
Figure 6Segregation distortion and pollen viability of F1 hybrids. (A) Segregation distortion of the co-dominant markers along linkage groups AeLG2 and AeLG9 in the F2 mapping population. Triangles refer to the CIAT22838 genotype, lozenges to the CIAT8232 genotype and squares to the heterozygote. X-axis: genetic distance from the top of the linkage group in Kosambi cM. Y-axis: frequency (%) of segregation of the different genotypes. If no distortion occurs, the segregation values should be 25%/50%/25%. B, Proportion of non-aborted pollen grains in the mapping parents and the F1 hybrid. C, Anther from the CIAT22838 line (upper left panel) and pollen grains of the mapping parents and the F1 hybrid. Aborted pollen stains pale and nonaborted pollen stains dark. Bars = 50 µm.
Estimation of divergence times between Aeschynomene and Arachis genomes
| Evolutionary divergence | Substitution per site (Ks) | Average (SR) | Divergence | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APX2 (738 pb) | AS2 (1,629 pb) | β-Fructofuranosidase (1,536 pb) | PIP2;7 (864 pb) | Proline-tRNA ligase (1,098 pb) | SPAG1 (861 pb) | TIP1;1 (750 pb) | (SR/Mya) | (Mya) | ||
| 0.581 | 0.556 | 0.504 | 0.797 | 0.380 | 0.431 | 0.442 | 0.527 | 0.00534 | 49 | |
| 0.569 | 0.576 | 0.531 | 0.758 | 0.367 | 0.421 | 0.419 | 0.520 | |||
| 0.029 | 0.039 | 0.037 | 0.053 | 0.025 | 0.049 | 0.026 | 0.037 | 0.00534 | ||
| 0.035 | 0.056 | 0.039 | 0.024 | 0.029 | 0.038 | 0.026 | 0.035 | 0.00534 | ||
| 0.035 | 0.050 | 0.045 | 0.024 | 0.038 | 0.032 | 0.026 | 0.036 | 0.00534 | ||
| 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 0.008 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.00534 | ||
*Average divergence rate obtained by using the known 49 MYA divergence time between Aeschynomene and Arachis. Numbers in bold are inferred values.
Figure 7Syntenic relationships of A. evenia with the sequenced Dalbergioid legume Arachis ipaiensis. (A) Comparison of the genetic map of A. evenia with the genome sequence of A. ipaensis. Circled bars on the left side correspond to the linkage groups of A. evenia while those on the right side represent the chromosomes of A. ipaensis. Homologous loci are connected by lines and spots correspond to symbiotic genes. Spots indicate conserved macrosyntenic locations and asterisks non-conserved ones. (B) Detailed example of macrosynteny between A. evenia and A. ipaensis. Alignment of linkage groups AeLG1 and AeLG8 from the developed genetic map of A. evenia with the corresponding A1 and A8 chromosomes of A. ipaensis. Dot lines connect orthologous loci between the two species. The dot line link the non-macrosyntenic location of the AeCcaMK gene.