Literature DB >> 27297846

Comparison of risk scores for the prediction of stroke in African Americans: Findings from the Jackson Heart Study.

Randi E Foraker1, Melissa Greiner2, Mario Sims3, Katherine L Tucker4, Amytis Towfighi5, Aurelian Bidulescu6, Abigail B Shoben7, Sakima Smith8, Sameera Talegawkar9, Chad Blackshear10, Wei Wang11, Natalie Chantelle Hardy12, Emily O'Brien13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence from existing cohort studies supports the prediction of incident coronary heart disease and stroke using 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores and the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association's cardiovascular health (CVH) metric.
METHODS: We included all Jackson Heart Study participants with complete scoring information at the baseline study visit (2000-2004) who had no history of stroke (n = 4,140). We used Kaplan-Meier methods to calculate the cumulative incidence of stroke and used Cox models to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs for stroke according to CVD risk and CVH score. We compared the discrimination of the 2 models according to the Harrell c index and plotted predicted vs observed stroke risk calibration plots for each of the 2 models.
RESULTS: The median age of the African American participants was 54.5 years, and 65% were female. The cumulative incidence of stroke increased across worsening categories of CVD risk and CVH. A 1-unit increase in CVD risk increased the hazard of stroke (1.07, 1.06-1.08), whereas each 1-unit increase in CVH corresponded to a decreased hazard of stroke (0.76, 0.69-0.83). As evidenced by the c statistics, the CVH model was less discriminating than the CVD risk model (0.59 [0.55-0.64] vs 0.79 [0.76-0.83]).
CONCLUSIONS: Both scores were associated with incident stroke in a dose-response fashion; however, the CVD risk model was more discriminating than the CVH model. The CVH score may still be preferable for its simplicity in application to broad patient populations and public health efforts.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27297846      PMCID: PMC4908834          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  26 in total

1.  The sensitivity and specificity of forecasting high-cost users of medical care.

Authors:  R T Meenan; C O'Keeffe-Rosetti; M C Hornbrook; D J Bachman; M J Goodman; P A Fishman; A V Hurtado
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Pooled Cohort risk equations.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Lisandro D Colantonio; Mary Cushman; David C Goff; George Howard; Virginia J Howard; Brett Kissela; Emily B Levitan; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Monika M Safford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Status of cardiovascular health in US adolescents: prevalence estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2005-2010.

Authors:  Christina M Shay; Hongyan Ning; Stephen R Daniels; Cherie R Rooks; Samuel S Gidding; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Validity of prognostic models: when is a model clinically useful?

Authors:  Yvonne Vergouwe; Ewout W Steyerberg; Marinus J C Eijkemans; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  2002-05

6.  Low prevalence of "ideal cardiovascular health" in a community-based population: the heart strategies concentrating on risk evaluation (Heart SCORE) study.

Authors:  Claudia Bambs; Kevin E Kip; Andrea Dinga; Suresh R Mulukutla; Aryan N Aiyer; Steven E Reis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The new "intermediate risk" group: a comparative analysis of the new 2013 ACC/AHA risk assessment guidelines versus prior guidelines in men.

Authors:  Michael J Blaha; Zeina A Dardari; Roger S Blumenthal; Seth S Martin; Khurram Nasir; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 5.162

8.  The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  A decade of racial and ethnic stroke disparities in the United States.

Authors:  Jose Gutierrez; Olajide A Williams
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Validity and calibration of food frequency questionnaires used with African-American adults in the Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Teresa C Carithers; Sameera A Talegawkar; Marjuyua L Rowser; Olivia R Henry; Patricia M Dubbert; Margaret L Bogle; Herman A Taylor; Katherine L Tucker
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  Relationship of stroke risk and hearing loss in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Jonathan E Sorrel; Charles E Bishop; Christopher Spankovich; Dan Su; Karen Valle; Samantha Seals; John M Schweinfurth
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Chromatin-modifying agents convert fibroblasts to OCT4+ and VEGFR-2+ capillary tube-forming cells.

Authors:  Anita Wary; Neil Wary; Jugajyoti Baruah; Victoria Mastej; Kishore K Wary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cigarette Smoking and Incident Stroke in Blacks of the Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Adebamike A Oshunbade; Wondwosen K Yimer; Karen A Valle; Donald Clark; Daisuke Kamimura; Wendy B White; Andrew P DeFilippis; Michael J Blaha; Emelia J Benjamin; Emily C O'Brien; Robert J Mentz; Ervin R Fox; Charles S O'Mara; Javed Butler; Adolfo Correa; Michael E Hall
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.