Literature DB >> 25173946

The new "intermediate risk" group: a comparative analysis of the new 2013 ACC/AHA risk assessment guidelines versus prior guidelines in men.

Michael J Blaha1, Zeina A Dardari2, Roger S Blumenthal2, Seth S Martin2, Khurram Nasir3, Mouaz H Al-Mallah4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2013 ACC/AHA Report on the Assessment of Cardiovascular (CVD) Risk redefined "intermediate risk". We sought to critically compare the intermediate risk groups identified by prior guidelines and the new ACC/AHA guidelines.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 30,005 adult men free of known CVD from a large, multi-ethnic study of middle-aged adults. The Framingham Risk Score was calculated using published equations, and CVD risk was calculated using the new ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations Risk Estimator. We first compared the size and characteristics of the intermediate risk group identified by the old (ATP III, 10-20% 10-year CHD risk) and new guidelines (5-7.4% 10-year CVD risk). We then defined time-to-high-risk as the length of time an individual patient resides in the intermediate risk group before progressing to high risk status based on advancing age alone.
RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 53 ± 13 years, and 24% were African-American. Patients identified as intermediate risk by the new ACC/AHA Guidelines were younger and more likely to be African-American and have lower risk factor burden (all p < 0.05). The new intermediate risk group was just 37% the size of the traditional ATP III intermediate risk group, while the new high risk group was 103% larger. Under the new guidelines, men remain intermediate risk for an average of just 3 years, compared to 8 years under the prior guidelines (63% shorter time-to-high-risk, p < 0.05), before progressing to high risk based on advancing age alone.
CONCLUSION: The new 2013 ACC/AHA risk assessment guidelines produce a markedly smaller, lower absolute risk, and more temporary "intermediate risk" group. These findings reshape the modern understanding of "intermediate risk", and have distinct implications for risk assessment, clinical decision making, and pharmacotherapy in primary prevention.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidelines; Primary prevention; Risk prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173946     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  8 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Artery Calcium: Recommendations for Risk Assessment in Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines.

Authors:  Mahmoud Al Rifai; Miguel Cainzos-Achirica; Sina Kianoush; Mohammadhassan Mirbolouk; Allison Peng; Josep Comin-Colet; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-09-26

Review 2.  Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Current Clinical Practice: How to Define Its Value?

Authors:  Sina Kianoush; Mohammadhassan Mirbolouk; Raghavendra Charan Makam; Khurram Nasir; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09-25

3.  Validation of the Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS): Dual importance of CAC score and CAC distribution from the Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) consortium.

Authors:  Omar Dzaye; Ramzi Dudum; Mohammadhassan Mirbolouk; Olusola A Orimoloye; Albert D Osei; Zeina A Dardari; Daniel S Berman; Michael D Miedema; Leslee Shaw; Alan Rozanski; Matthias Holdhoff; Khurram Nasir; John A Rumberger; Matthew J Budoff; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Ron Blankstein; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2019-03-28

Review 4.  Recent Update to the US Cholesterol Treatment Guidelines: A Comparison With International Guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew Nayor; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparison of risk scores for the prediction of stroke in African Americans: Findings from the Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Randi E Foraker; Melissa Greiner; Mario Sims; Katherine L Tucker; Amytis Towfighi; Aurelian Bidulescu; Abigail B Shoben; Sakima Smith; Sameera Talegawkar; Chad Blackshear; Wei Wang; Natalie Chantelle Hardy; Emily O'Brien
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  Pathways Forward in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention One and a Half Years After Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines.

Authors:  Miguel Cainzos-Achirica; Chintan S Desai; Libin Wang; Michael J Blaha; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Stephen L Kopecky; Roger S Blumenthal; Seth S Martin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: an Update.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Sherif Sakr; Ada Al-Qunaibet
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 8.  Coronary artery calcium data and reporting system: Strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Subramaniyan Ramanathan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.