Paul Muntner1, Lisandro D Colantonio2, Mary Cushman3, David C Goff4, George Howard5, Virginia J Howard2, Brett Kissela6, Emily B Levitan2, Donald M Lloyd-Jones7, Monika M Safford8. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham2Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 6. Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 7. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 8. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort risk equations were developed to estimate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and guide statin initiation. OBJECTIVE: To assess calibration and discrimination of the Pooled Cohort risk equations in a contemporary US population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 45 to 79 years enrolled in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study between January 2003 and October 2007 and followed up through December 2010. We studied participants for whom atherosclerotic CVD risk may trigger a discussion of statin initiation (those without clinical atherosclerotic CVD or diabetes, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level between 70 and 189 mg/dL, and not taking statins; n = 10,997). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Predicted risk and observed adjudicated atherosclerotic CVD incidence (nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease [CHD] death, nonfatal or fatal stroke) at 5 years because REGARDS participants have not been followed up for 10 years. Additional analyses, limited to Medicare beneficiaries (n = 3333), added atherosclerotic CVD events identified in Medicare claims data. RESULTS: There were 338 adjudicated events (192 CHD events, 146 strokes). The observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD incidence per 1000 person-years for participants with a 10-year predicted atherosclerotic CVD risk of less than 5% was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.3-2.7) and 1.9, respectively, risk of 5% to less than 7.5% was 4.8 (95% CI, 3.4-6.7) and 4.8, risk of 7.5% to less than 10% was 6.1 (95% CI, 4.4-8.6) and 6.9, and risk of 10% or greater was 12.0 (95% CI, 10.6-13.6) and 15.1 (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 19.9, P = .01). The C index was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.75). There were 234 atherosclerotic CVD events (120 CHD events, 114 strokes) among Medicare-linked participants and the observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD incidence per 1000 person-years for participants with a predicted risk of less than 7.5% was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.8-10.1) and 4.0, respectively, risk of 7.5% to less than 10% was 7.9 (95% CI, 4.6-13.5) and 6.4, and risk of 10% or greater was 17.4 (95% CI, 15.3-19.8) and 16.4 (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 5.4, P = .71). The C index was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.64-0.71). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort of US adults for whom statin initiation is considered based on the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort risk equations, observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD risks were similar, indicating that these risk equations were well calibrated in the population for which they were designed to be used, and demonstrated moderate to good discrimination.
IMPORTANCE: The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort risk equations were developed to estimate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and guide statin initiation. OBJECTIVE: To assess calibration and discrimination of the Pooled Cohort risk equations in a contemporary US population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 45 to 79 years enrolled in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study between January 2003 and October 2007 and followed up through December 2010. We studied participants for whom atherosclerotic CVD risk may trigger a discussion of statin initiation (those without clinical atherosclerotic CVD or diabetes, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level between 70 and 189 mg/dL, and not taking statins; n = 10,997). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Predicted risk and observed adjudicated atherosclerotic CVD incidence (nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease [CHD] death, nonfatal or fatal stroke) at 5 years because REGARDS participants have not been followed up for 10 years. Additional analyses, limited to Medicare beneficiaries (n = 3333), added atherosclerotic CVD events identified in Medicare claims data. RESULTS: There were 338 adjudicated events (192 CHD events, 146 strokes). The observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD incidence per 1000 person-years for participants with a 10-year predicted atherosclerotic CVD risk of less than 5% was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.3-2.7) and 1.9, respectively, risk of 5% to less than 7.5% was 4.8 (95% CI, 3.4-6.7) and 4.8, risk of 7.5% to less than 10% was 6.1 (95% CI, 4.4-8.6) and 6.9, and risk of 10% or greater was 12.0 (95% CI, 10.6-13.6) and 15.1 (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 19.9, P = .01). The C index was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.75). There were 234 atherosclerotic CVD events (120 CHD events, 114 strokes) among Medicare-linked participants and the observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD incidence per 1000 person-years for participants with a predicted risk of less than 7.5% was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.8-10.1) and 4.0, respectively, risk of 7.5% to less than 10% was 7.9 (95% CI, 4.6-13.5) and 6.4, and risk of 10% or greater was 17.4 (95% CI, 15.3-19.8) and 16.4 (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 5.4, P = .71). The C index was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.64-0.71). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort of US adults for whom statin initiation is considered based on the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort risk equations, observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD risks were similar, indicating that these risk equations were well calibrated in the population for which they were designed to be used, and demonstrated moderate to good discrimination.
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Fred S Apple; Marcello Galvani; Hugo A Katus; L Kristin Newby; Jan Ravkilde; Bernard Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Mikael Dellborg; Hanoch Hod; Pekka Porela; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; George A Beller; Robert Bonow; Ernst E Van der Wall; Jean-Pierre Bassand; William Wijns; T Bruce Ferguson; Philippe G Steg; Barry F Uretsky; David O Williams; Paul W Armstrong; Elliott M Antman; Keith A Fox; Christian W Hamm; E Magnus Ohman; Maarten L Simoons; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Enrique P Gurfinkel; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Prem Pais; Shanti Mendis; Jun-Ren Zhu; Lars C Wallentin; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Kim M Fox; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Silvia G Priori; Michal Tendera; Liisa-Maria Voipio-Pulkki; Alec Vahanian; A John Camm; Raffaele De Caterina; Veronica Dean; Kenneth Dickstein; Gerasimos Filippatos; Christian Funck-Brentano; Irene Hellemans; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Keith McGregor; Udo Sechtem; Sigmund Silber; Michal Tendera; Petr Widimsky; José Luis Zamorano; Joao Morais; Sorin Brener; Robert Harrington; David Morrow; Michael Lim; Marco A Martinez-Rios; Steve Steinhubl; Glen N Levine; W Brian Gibler; David Goff; Marco Tubaro; Darek Dudek; Nawwar Al-Attar Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wayne D Rosamond; Lloyd E Chambless; Gerardo Heiss; Thomas H Mosley; Josef Coresh; Eric Whitsel; Lynne Wagenknecht; Hanyu Ni; Aaron R Folsom Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dawn O Kleindorfer; Jane Khoury; Charles J Moomaw; Kathleen Alwell; Daniel Woo; Matthew L Flaherty; Pooja Khatri; Opeolu Adeoye; Simona Ferioli; Joseph P Broderick; Brett M Kissela Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Virginia J Howard; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Suzanne E Judd; Leslie A McClure; Monika M Safford; J David Rhodes; Mary Cushman; Claudia S Moy; Elsayed Z Soliman; Brett M Kissela; George Howard Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Elsayed Z Soliman; George Howard; Mary Cushman; Brett Kissela; Dawn Kleindorfer; Anh Le; Suzanne Judd; Leslie A McClure; Virginia J Howard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Monika M Safford; Todd M Brown; Paul M Muntner; Raegan W Durant; Stephen Glasser; Jewell H Halanych; James M Shikany; Ronald J Prineas; Tandaw Samdarshi; Vera A Bittner; Cora E Lewis; Christopher Gamboa; Mary Cushman; Virginia Howard; George Howard Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul Muntner; Emily B Levitan; Todd M Brown; Pradeep Sharma; Hong Zhao; Vera Bittner; Stephen Glasser; Meredith Kilgore; Huifeng Yun; J Michael Woolley; Michael E Farkouh; Robert S Rosenson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Mark A Hlatky; Roberta M Ray; Dale R Burwen; Karen L Margolis; Karen C Johnson; Anna Kucharska-Newton; JoAnn E Manson; Jennifer G Robinson; Monika M Safford; Matthew Allison; Themistocles L Assimes; Anthony A Bavry; Jeffrey Berger; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Susan R Heckbert; Wenjun Li; Simin Liu; Lisa W Martin; Marco V Perez; Hilary A Tindle; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2014-01-07
Authors: Lisandro D Colantonio; Usman Baber; Maciej Banach; Rikki M Tanner; David G Warnock; Orlando M Gutiérrez; Monika M Safford; Christoph Wanner; George Howard; Paul Muntner Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Joseph Yeboah; Stefan Sillau; Joseph C Delaney; Michael J Blaha; Erin D Michos; Rebekah Young; Waqas T Qureshi; Robyn McClelland; Gregory L Burke; Bruce M Psaty; David M Herrington Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Alvin Rajkomar; Michaela Hardt; Michael D Howell; Greg Corrado; Marshall H Chin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Meredith S Duncan; Matthew S Freiberg; Robert A Greevy; Suman Kundu; Ramachandran S Vasan; Hilary A Tindle Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Samia Mora; Nanette K Wenger; Nancy R Cook; Jingmin Liu; Barbara V Howard; Marian C Limacher; Simin Liu; Karen L Margolis; Lisa W Martin; Nina P Paynter; Paul M Ridker; Jennifer G Robinson; Jacques E Rossouw; Monika M Safford; JoAnn E Manson Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Nivee P Amin; Seth S Martin; Michael J Blaha; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Erin D Michos Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 24.094