Literature DB >> 25814251

Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthetic valve as a valid control in preclinical in vivo ovine studies.

Laura Harvey1, Richard Bianco2, Matthew Lahti3, John Carney3, Lindsey Zhang3, Nicholas Robinson3.   

Abstract

To progress into clinical practice, a bioprosthetic heart valve must first pass through the preclinical evaluation phase. The International Standards Organization (ISO) recommends implantation of concurrent controls in any evaluation of a new or modified heart valve. A total of 8 adult sheep underwent aortic valve replacement, receiving either the CE Perimount Magna 3000 aortic pericardial bioprosthetic valve or the CE Perimount RSR aortic pericardial bioprosthetic valve, Model 2800. We performed serial blood sampling, echocardiography, angiography and necropsy after euthanasia. All 8 sheep survived until the end of their study term. Our 2-dimensional echocardiographic analysis showed a mean pressure gradient of 37.4±6.0mmHg at 14 days and 37.0±5.9mmHg at 90 days; mean cardiac output was 10.0±2.8l/min at 14 days and 9.6±1.6l/min at 90 days. Angiography before euthanasia showed a mean aortic transvalvular gradient of 32.3±15.3mmHg. At euthanasia, we saw no evidence of calcification in any of the valves. In our study, we found that both models of the CE bioprosthetic heart valve we tested proved to be valid controls, in the aortic position, in sheep-with no evidence of calcification. Most important, the valves we tested had a few model-related problems, allowing a clear determination of their suitability for introduction into a clinical trial. Investigators now have additional insight into the safety of these 2 models of valves and perhaps will be able to reduce the number of controls implanted.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Calcification; Perimount; Thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25814251     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0014-2999            Impact factor:   4.432


  4 in total

1.  Strategies to Improve Survival from Surgery for Heart Valve Implantation in Sheep.

Authors:  Annemijn Vis; Jan Cam Lammers; Roel de Vroege; Martijn Mj van Nieuwburg; Marlijn S Jansen; Joyce Mj Visser; Bart Meuris; Paul F Gründeman; Jolanda Kluin
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Noninferiority of Shanghai Cingular biotech's bovine pericardial valve preclinical study in juvenile ovine model.

Authors:  Jin-Miao Chen; Yu Ding; Shu-Yang Lu; Sun Pan; Mieradilijiang Abudupataer; Tao Hong; Chun-Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Biological Equivalence of GGTA-1 Glycosyltransferase Knockout and Standard Porcine Pericardial Tissue Using 90-Day Mitral Valve Implantation in Adolescent Sheep.

Authors:  Christopher McGregor; Jacob Salmonsmith; Gaetano Burriesci; Guerard Byrne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.305

4.  Establishing Background Pathologic Changes of Valve Replacement Surgery in Sheep.

Authors:  Jill T Schappa Faustich; John P Carney; Matthew T Lahti; Benjamin L Zhang; Richard W Bianco
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.495

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.