Literature DB >> 2729383

A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death.

T R Moore1, K Piacquadio.   

Abstract

Fetal death is a tragedy for mother, family, and obstetrician. Recent reviews of fetal death indicate that nearly half occur in pregnancies that are not candidates for traditional antepartum testing. We conducted a prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of a fetal movement screening program in reducing the fetal mortality rate. During a 7-month control period, 2519 deliveries occurred, no formal fetal movement assessment was done, and the fetal mortality rate was 8.7 per 1000 births. A pilot study was conducted to validate a protocol in which the patient was instructed to record the elapsed time required to appreciate 10 fetal movements. The mean time interval was 20.9 +/- 18.1 minutes (mean +/- SD). Patients in whom 2 hours elapsed without 10 fetal movements (mean +/- 5 SD) were to report to the delivery unit for further evaluation. During the study period, 1864 patients were delivered of infants and the fetal mortality rate was 2.1 per 1000 (chi 2 = 6.8, p less than 0.01). During the study period the number of antepartum tests performed increased by 13%. Interventions for fetal compromise prompted by inadequate fetal activity tripled in the study period, resulting in a drop in fetal mortality among patients with decreased movement from 44 to 10 per 1000. We conclude that the count-to-10 fetal movement screening program is simple and effective in reducing the fetal mortality rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2729383     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90164-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  17 in total

Review 1.  Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Tanya Soomro; Esme V Menezes; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Diagnostic value of fetal movement counting by mother and the optimal recording duration.

Authors:  Mahin Kamalifard; Shamsi Abbasalizadeh; Morteza Ghojazadeh; Fatemeh Ghatreh Samani; Leila Rabiei
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2013-06-01

3.  Antepartum evaluation of the fetus and fetal well being.

Authors:  Erica O'Neill; John Thorp
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 5.  Professional and patient perspectives of NICE guidelines to abandon maternal monitoring of fetal movements.

Authors:  Ian Hill-Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The effect of glucose administration on perceived fetal movements in women with decreased fetal movement, a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  N Michaan; Y Baruch; M Topilsky; S Amzalag; I Iaskov; A Many; S Maslovitz
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth Thom; Marshall W Carpenter; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Margaret Harper; George Saade; Kristine Y Lain; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa; Garland B Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies.

Authors:  J G Lalor; B Fawole; Z Alfirevic; D Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

9.  Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women - a clinical quality improvement.

Authors:  Eli Saastad; Julie Victoria Holm Tveit; Vicki Flenady; Babill Stray-Pedersen; Ruth C Fretts; Per E Børdahl; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-01-04

10.  Temporal patterns in count-to-ten fetal movement charts and their associations with pregnancy characteristics: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Brita Askeland Winje; Jo Røislien; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.