Literature DB >> 15527614

Professional and patient perspectives of NICE guidelines to abandon maternal monitoring of fetal movements.

Ian Hill-Smith1.   

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, fetal movement counts have been recommended to women in the second half of pregnancy as a way of monitoring fetal wellbeing and providing an early warning of fetal distress. However, guidance from the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends abandoning this. Evidence is reviewed to show that the chance of preventing physical damage to the fetus is indeed low. The activity of monitoring movements has been favoured by the majority of women. The new NICE guidance is useful to clarify professional understanding of the limitation of counting fetal movements, but women who notice decreased movements will still need referral for human factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15527614      PMCID: PMC1324922     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  30 in total

1.  Counting fetal movements as a universal test for fetal wellbeing.

Authors:  R Berbey; A Manduley; P Vigil-De Gracia
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Doppler velocimetry for predicting outcome of pregnancies with decreased fetal movements.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Korszun; Mariusz Dubiel; Marek Kudla; Saemundur Gudmundsson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  An evaluation of the impact of NICE guidance on GP prescribing.

Authors:  Bernard Wathen; Tara Dean
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Maternal perception of decreased fetal movement as an indication for antepartum testing in a low-risk population.

Authors:  J E Whitty; D A Garfinkel; M Y Divon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Fetal movements in utero: nature, assessment, prognostic value, timing of delivery.

Authors:  E Sadovsky; W Z Polishuk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  [Counting fetal movements in ambulatory prenatal care].

Authors:  J Kindt; U Erhardt; U Retzke
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1987

7.  Maternal anxiety in late pregnancy: effect on fetal movements and fetal heart rate.

Authors:  Karin Sjöström; Lil Valentin; Thomas Thelin; Karel Marsál
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Reduced fetal movements and maternal medication - new pregnancy risk factors for neurodevelopmental disability in childhood.

Authors:  D K James; F M Telfer; N A Keating; M E Blair; M A Wilcox; C Chilvers
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  The effect of fetal movement counting on maternal attachment to fetus.

Authors:  M S Mikhail; M C Freda; R B Merkatz; R Polizzotto; E Mazloom; I R Merkatz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The psychological effects of counting fetal movements.

Authors:  R M Liston; K Bloom; P Zimmer
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.689

View more
  5 in total

1.  Exercise guidelines in pregnancy: new perspectives.

Authors:  Gerald S Zavorsky; Lawrence D Longo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Should we stop telling well pregnant women to monitor fetal movements? How to use and interpret guidelines.

Authors:  Chris Del Mar; Vivienne O'Connor
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Diagnostic value of fetal movement counting by mother and the optimal recording duration.

Authors:  Mahin Kamalifard; Shamsi Abbasalizadeh; Morteza Ghojazadeh; Fatemeh Ghatreh Samani; Leila Rabiei
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 4.  Screening and triage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in general population and high risk pregnancies: a systematic review with a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirths.

Authors:  Aamer Imdad; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Saad Siddiqui; Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women - a clinical quality improvement.

Authors:  Eli Saastad; Julie Victoria Holm Tveit; Vicki Flenady; Babill Stray-Pedersen; Ruth C Fretts; Per E Børdahl; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-01-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.