Literature DB >> 22828105

Antepartum evaluation of the fetus and fetal well being.

Erica O'Neill1, John Thorp.   

Abstract

Despite widespread use of many methods of antenatal testing, limited evidence exists to demonstrate effectiveness at improving perinatal outcomes. An exception is the use of Doppler ultrasound in monitoring high-risk pregnancies thought to be at risk of placental insufficiency. Otherwise, obstetricians should proceed with caution and approach the initiation of a testing protocol by obtaining an informed consent. When confronted with an abnormal test, clinicians should evaluate with a second antenatal test and consider administering betamethasone, performing amniocentesis to assess lung maturity, and/or repeating testing to minimize the chance of iatrogenic prematurity in case of a healthy fetus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22828105      PMCID: PMC3684248          DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318253b318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  17 in total

1.  ACOG practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Number 9, October 1999 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 188, January 1994). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of fetal hypoxia and acidosis at birth.

Authors:  S Tyrrell; A H Obaid; R J Lilford
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing.

Authors:  L Mangesi; G J Hofmeyr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

4.  The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s.

Authors:  D A Miller; Y A Rabello; R H Paul
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Analysis of 'count-to-ten' fetal movement charts: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  B A Winje; E Saastad; N Gunnes; J V H Tveit; B Stray-Pedersen; V Flenady; J F Frøen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons.

Authors:  A Grant; D Elbourne; L Valentin; S Alexander
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths.

Authors:  F A Manning; I Morrison; C R Harman; I R Lange; S Menticoglou
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery.

Authors:  V H Karsdorp; J M van Vugt; H P van Geijn; P J Kostense; D Arduini; N Montenegro; T Todros
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results.

Authors:  R K Freeman; G Anderson; W Dorchester
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death.

Authors:  T R Moore; K Piacquadio
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  Perinatal outcomes of reduced fetal movements: a cohort study.

Authors:  Claire M McCarthy; S Meaney; K O'Donoghue
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 2.  Amniotic fluid as a vital sign for fetal wellbeing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Dubil; Everett F Magann
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  Comparison of umbilical artery Doppler and non-stress test in assessment of fetal well-being in gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shirin Niromanesh; Mahboobeh Shirazi; Mitra Eftekhariyazdi; Forough Mortazavi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-12-25

4.  Evaluation of the predictive value of fetal Doppler ultrasound for neonatal outcome from the 36th week of pregnancy.

Authors:  Zahra Laleh Eslamian; Elahe Zarean; Maryam Moshfeghi; Zahra Heidari
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Machine Learning Model for Classifying the Results of Fetal Cardiotocography Conducted in High-Risk Pregnancies.

Authors:  Tae Jun Park; Hye Jin Chang; Byung Jin Choi; Jung Ah Jung; Seongwoo Kang; Seokyoung Yoon; Miran Kim; Dukyong Yoon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.052

6.  Umbilical Artery Systolic/Diastolic Ratio and Amniotic Fluid Index in Prediction of Adverse Perinatal Outcome in Term Pregnancies.

Authors:  Medhavi Sharma; Gaurav Sharma; Anjana Verma
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 7.  Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment.

Authors:  Rosalie M Grivell; Zarko Alfirevic; Gillian M L Gyte; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-12

8.  Reference ranges of fetal superior vena cava blood flow velocities and pulsatility index in the second half of pregnancy: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Maria Stefopoulou; Lotta Herling; Jonas Johnson; Peter Lindgren; Torvid Kiserud; Ganesh Acharya
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.