Literature DB >> 2729302

Meta-analysis of research on the effect of clinical pharmacokinetics services on therapeutic drug monitoring.

L D Ried1, D A McKenna, J R Horn.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis of 27 published and unpublished studies of the impact of clinical pharmacokinetics services on patients' serum drug concentrations, the appropriate collection of blood samples, and the appropriate use of assay results was conducted. An individual study's effect size (ES) was determined by subtracting probits or by calculating the Bayesian estimate of pi derived from the percentages observed in the experimental and control groups. Weights based on an individual study's sample size were used to estimate the overall ES. Patients monitored by clinical pharmacokinetics services were significantly more likely to have serum drug concentrations within an acceptable therapeutic range than were patients who were not monitored. When each of the monitoring parameters was investigated individually, monitored patients were more likely to have therapeutic peak (ES = 0.51, 95% confidence interval = -0.34 to 1.36) and trough (ES = 1.15, 95% CI = -0.37 to 2.68) serum drug concentrations, to be within therapeutic range (ES = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.63), and to have fewer toxic peak (ES = 0.06, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.65) and trough (ES = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.12 to 1.82) serum drug concentrations. Clinical pharmacokinetics services were also more likely to have collected blood samples appropriately (ES = 0.87, 95% CI = -0.25 to 2.00) and to have used assay results appropriately (ES = 1.21, 95% CI = -0.46 to 2.88). Clinical pharmacokinetics services appeared to have a significant influence on the proportion of patients with desirable serum drug concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2729302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0002-9289


  9 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacy in primary care.

Authors:  G M Hawksworth; H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Best practice in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  A S Gross
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Therapeutic drug monitoring beyond 2000.

Authors:  G M Shenfield
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Methods of minimising the cost of aminoglycoside therapy to hospitals.

Authors:  C A Gentry; K A Rodvold; J S Bertino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Granisetron. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  G L Plosker; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in the 21st century. Does the evidence support definitive outcomes?

Authors:  M H Ensom; G A Davis; C D Cropp; R J Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  How important is therapeutic drug monitoring in the prediction and avoidance of adverse reactions?

Authors:  C A Gentry; K A Rodvold
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetics: the therapeutic drug monitoring of the future?

Authors:  M H Ensom; T K Chang; P Patel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.577

9.  Knowledge, Confidence, and Perception Toward Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Among Physicians and Pharmacists in Kuwait.

Authors:  Abdullah Albassam; Sarah S Alghanem; Farah Alawadhi; Zainab Alsulaimani
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.118

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.