Literature DB >> 2729101

"Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: I. Sodium chloride and dioctyl phthalate aerosol filter efficiency as a function of particle size and flow rate.

G A Stevens1, E S Moyer.   

Abstract

The efficiency of filter media is dependent on the characteristics of the challenge aerosol and the filter's construction. Challenge aerosol parameters, such as particle size, density, shape, electrical charge, and flow rate, are influential in determining the filter's efficiency. In this regard, a so-called "worst case" set of conditions has been proposed for testing respirator filter efficiency in order to ensure wearer protection. Data collected on various types of filters (dust and mist; dust, fume, and mist; paint, lacquer, and enamel mist; and high efficiency) challenged with a worst case-type sodium chloride (NaCl) and dioctyl phthalate (DOP) aerosol are presented. The particle size of maximum penetration varies as a function of filter type and was less than 0.25-micron count mean diameter (CMD) in all cases. The count efficiency for high efficiency filters was greater than 99.97% at worst case testing conditions, but the worst case count efficiencies for dust and mist; dust, fume and mist; and paint, lacquer and enamel mist filters were not nearly as efficient as existing test methods indicate. Also, as the test flow rate is increased, the count efficiency decreases. Thus, respirator filters were found to conform to the prediction of single-fiber filtration theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2729101     DOI: 10.1080/15298668991374615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  7 in total

1.  Particle Count Statistics Applied to the Penetration of a Filter Challenged with Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Linda H Schmoll
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Conducting an evaluation of CBRN canister protection capabilities against emerging chemical and radiological hazards.

Authors:  Lee A Greenawald; Christopher J Karwacki; Frank Palya; Matthew A Browe; David Bradley; Jonathan V Szalajda
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  What does respirator certification tell us about filtration of ultrafine particles?

Authors:  Robert M Eninger; Takeshi Honda; Tiina Reponen; Roy McKay; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Characterization of performance and disinfection resilience of nonwoven filter materials for use in 3D-printed N95 respirators.

Authors:  Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Brian Strzelecki; Monica Ortiz-Hernandez; Patrick Aubin; Xuefang Jing; Qing Chang; Jinhua Xiang; Peter S Thorne; Jack T Stapleton
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.359

5.  Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of Commercially Available Dust Masks.

Authors:  Samy Rengasamy; Benjamin C Eimer; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Int Soc Respir Prot       Date:  2008 Spring-Summer

Review 6.  Respiratory protection against bioaerosols: literature review and research needs.

Authors:  Appavoo Rengasamy; Ziqing Zhuang; Roland Berryann
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  A comparison of facemask and respirator filtration test methods.

Authors:  Samy Rengasamy; Ronald Shaffer; Brandon Williams; Sarah Smit
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.155

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.