Literature DB >> 18322869

What does respirator certification tell us about filtration of ultrafine particles?

Robert M Eninger1, Takeshi Honda, Tiina Reponen, Roy McKay, Sergey A Grinshpun.   

Abstract

Recent interest in exposures to ultrafine particles (less than 100 nm) in both environmental and occupational settings led the authors to question whether the protocols used to certify respirator filters provide adequate attention to ultrafine aerosols. The authors reviewed the particle size distribution of challenge aerosols and evaluated the aerosol measurement method currently employed in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) particulate respirator certification protocol for its ability to measure the contribution of ultrafine particles to filter penetration. Also considered were the differences between mechanical and electrically charged (electret) filters in light of the most penetrating particle size. It was found that the sodium chloride (NaCl) and dioctylphthalate (DOP) aerosols currently used in respirator certification tests contain a significant fraction of particles in the ultrafine region. However, the photometric method deployed in the certification test is not capable of adequately measuring light scatter of particles below approximately 100 nm in diameter. Specifically, 68% (by count) and 8% (by mass) of the challenge NaCl aerosol particles and 10% (by count) and 0.3% (by mass) of the DOP particles below 100 nm do not significantly contribute to the filter penetration measurement. In addition, the most penetrating particle size for electret filters likely occurs at 100 nm or less under test conditions similar to those used in filter certification. The authors conclude, therefore, that the existing NIOSH certification protocol may not represent a worst-case assessment for electret filters because it has limited ability to determine the contribution of ultrafine aerosols, which include the most penetrating particle size for electret filters. Possible strategies to assess ultrafine particle penetration in the certification protocol are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18322869      PMCID: PMC6800048          DOI: 10.1080/15459620801960153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ultrafine particles.

Authors:  K Donaldson; V Stone; A Clouter; L Renwick; W MacNee
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Droplet fate in indoor environments, or can we prevent the spread of infection?

Authors:  L Morawska
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.770

3.  Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks?

Authors:  Anna Bałazy; Mika Toivola; Atin Adhikari; Satheesh K Sivasubramani; Tiina Reponen; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Experimental determinations of Mueller scattering matrices for nonspherical particles.

Authors:  R J Perry; A J Hunt; D R Huffman
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1978-09-01       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Collection efficiency of respirator filters challenged with monodisperse latex aerosols.

Authors:  L M Brosseau; J S Evans; M J Ellenbecker; M L Feldstein
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1989-10

6.  Electrostatic respirator filter media: filter efficiency and most penetrating particle size effects.

Authors:  S B Martin; E S Moyer
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2000-08

7.  "Worst-case" aerosol testing parameters: III. Initial penetration of charged and neutralized lead fume and silica dust aerosols through clean, unloaded respirator filters.

Authors:  E S Moyer; G A Stevens
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1989-05

8.  "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: II. Efficiency dependence of commercial respirator filters on humidity pretreatment.

Authors:  E S Moyer; G A Stevens
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1989-05

9.  "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: I. Sodium chloride and dioctyl phthalate aerosol filter efficiency as a function of particle size and flow rate.

Authors:  G A Stevens; E S Moyer
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1989-05

Review 10.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  A comparison of total inward leakage measured using sodium chloride (NaCl) and corn oil aerosol methods for air-purifying respirators.

Authors:  Samy Rengasamy; Ziqing Zhuang; George Niezgoda; Gary Walbert; Robert Lawrence; Brenda Boutin; Judith Hudnall; William P Monaghan; Michael Bergman; Colleen Miller; James Harris; Christopher Coffey
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Air sampling filtration media: Collection efficiency for respirable size-selective sampling.

Authors:  Jhy-Charm Soo; Keenan Monaghan; Taekhee Lee; Mike Kashon; Martin Harper
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of Commercially Available Dust Masks.

Authors:  Samy Rengasamy; Benjamin C Eimer; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Int Soc Respir Prot       Date:  2008 Spring-Summer

4.  Fume particle size distribution and fume generation rate during arc welding of cast iron.

Authors:  Jyunya Takahashi; Hitoshi Nakashima; Nobuyuki Fujii
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Viable viral efficiency of N95 and P100 respirator filters at constant and cyclic flow.

Authors:  Paul D Gardner; Jonathan P Eshbaugh; Shannon D Harpest; Aaron W Richardson; Kent C Hofacre
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Evaluation of a New Workplace Protection Factor-Measuring Method for Filtering Facepiece Respirator.

Authors:  Chenchen Sun; Christoph Thelen; Iris Sancho Sanz; Andreas Wittmann
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2019-11-13

7.  Filter performance of n99 and n95 facepiece respirators against viruses and ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Robert M Eninger; Takeshi Honda; Atin Adhikari; Helvi Heinonen-Tanski; Tiina Reponen; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2008-05-13

8.  Filtration efficiency of surgical sterilization fabric for respiratory protection during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sinan Sousan; Nicole Garcia; Avian White; Jo Anne Balanay
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.303

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.