Literature DB >> 32776823

Conducting an evaluation of CBRN canister protection capabilities against emerging chemical and radiological hazards.

Lee A Greenawald1, Christopher J Karwacki2, Frank Palya3, Matthew A Browe2, David Bradley4, Jonathan V Szalajda1.   

Abstract

In the event of a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) hazard release, emergency responders rely on respiratory protection to prevent inhalation of these hazards. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) CBRN Statement of Standard calls for CBRN respirator canisters to be challenged with 11 different chemical test representative agents (TRAs) during certification testing, which represent hazards from 7 distinct Chemical Families; these 11 TRAs were identified during the original 2001 CBRN hazard assessment. CBRN hazards are constantly evolving in type, intent of use, and ways of dissemination. Thus, new and emerging hazards must be identified to ensure CBRN canisters continue to provide protection to emergency responders against all hazards that would most likely be used in an intentional or unintentional event. The objectives are to: (1) update the CBRN list of hazards to ensure NIOSH-approved CBRN canisters continue to provide adequate protection capabilities from newly emerging chemical and radiological hazards and (2) identify the need to update NIOSH TRAs to ensure testing conditions represent relevant hazards. These objectives were accomplished by reviewing recent hazard assessments to identify a list of chemical and radiological respiratory hazards, evaluate chemical/physical properties and filtration behavior for these hazards, group the hazards based on NIOSH's current Chemical Families, and finally compare the hazards to the current TRAs based on anticipated filtration behavior, among other criteria. Upon completion of the evaluation process, 237 hazards were identified and compared to NIOSH's current CBRN TRAs. Of these 237 hazards, 203 were able to be categorized into one of NIOSH's current seven Chemical Families. Five were identified for further evaluation. Based on reviewing key chemical/physical properties of each hazard, NIOSH's current 11 TRAs remain representative of the identified respiratory CBRN hazards to emergency responders and should continue to be used during NIOSH certification testing. Thus, NIOSH's CBRN Statement of Standard remains unchanged. The process developed standardizes a methodology for future hazard evaluations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon filtration; personal protective equipment; respirator; test representative agent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32776823      PMCID: PMC7530140          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1798452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  7 in total

1.  Estimating service lives of air-purifying respirator cartridges for reactive gas removal.

Authors:  Gerry O Wood
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Adsorptive removal of gaseous methyl iodide by triethylenediamine (TEDA)-metal impregnated activated carbons under humid conditions.

Authors:  Keon Ho; Seunghyun Moon; Hyung Chae Lee; Young Kyu Hwang; Chang-Ha Lee
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Metal-organic frameworks for air purification of toxic chemicals.

Authors:  Jared B DeCoste; Gregory W Peterson
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Cyclohexane as an alternative vapor of carbon tetrachloride for the assessment of gas removing capacities of gas masks.

Authors:  M Furuse; S Kanno; T Takano; Y Matsumura
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 5.  Carbon tetrachloride replacement compounds for organic vapor air-purifying respirator cartridge and activated carbon testing--a review.

Authors:  E S Moyer; S J Smith; G O Wood
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

6.  Radiological dispersal device outdoor simulation test: cesium chloride particle characteristics.

Authors:  Sang Don Lee; Emily G Snyder; Robert Willis; Robert Fischer; Dianne Gates-Anderson; Mark Sutton; Brian Viani; John Drake; John MacKinney
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: I. Sodium chloride and dioctyl phthalate aerosol filter efficiency as a function of particle size and flow rate.

Authors:  G A Stevens; E S Moyer
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1989-05
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Occupational Safety and Health and Illicit Opioids: State of the Research on Protecting Against the Threat of Occupational Exposure.

Authors:  Casey Basham; Audrey Cerles; Margaret Rush; Marissa Alexander-Scott; Lee Greenawald; Sophia Chiu; Kendra Broadwater; Deborah Hirst; John Snawder; Jennifer Roberts; Angela Weber; Martha Knuth; Rocco Casagrande
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2021-08-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.