Literature DB >> 27290937

A first look at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education anesthesiology milestones: implementation of self-evaluation in a large residency program.

Faith J Ross1, David G Metro2, Shawn T Beaman3, James G Cain4, Monique M Dowdy5, Abraham Apfel6, Jong-Hyeon Jeong7, James W Ibinson8.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine if there is a correlation between resident postgraduate year (PGY) of training and self-evaluation of performance using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones.
DESIGN: Survey.
SETTING: Residency program at a large academic center. PATIENTS: Residents and Faculty Clinical Competency Committee (CCC).
INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Resident and CCC milestone scores. MAIN
RESULTS: Correlation coefficients for average score for each milestone vs PGY level ranged from 0.80 for receiving and giving feedback to 0.95 for anesthetic choice and conduct. All milestones showed a relatively linear relationship with PGY of training, and none were found to be consistently reached very late or very early in training. When examining variation across the scores for the individual residents, the distributions for PGY-2 and -3 appeared to be wider than those for PGY-1 and -4. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.718 to 0.928.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a remarkable degree of consistency in the relationship between level of training and resident self-assessment score for every milestone, as well as strong agreement between the resident and CCC faculty scores. Examination of the variance in the scores, when interpreted in light of our particular training program's characteristics, suggests that the milestones accurately reflect the progression in skill across the residency. In addition, given the concordance between the self-evaluation scores and the CCC faculty scores, self-evaluation may be a reasonable starting point as programs begin the daunting task of determining scores for each of the 25 milestones as part of the biannual evaluation process.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesiology; Milestones; Residency; Self-assessment; Self-evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27290937     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  5 in total

1.  The Promise of Milestones: Are They Living Up to Our Expectations?

Authors:  Su-Ting T Li
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-02

2.  Influence of Clinical Competency Committee Review Process on Summative Resident Assessment Decisions.

Authors:  Daniel J Schumacher; Beth King; Michelle M Barnes; Sean P Elliott; Kathleen Gibbs; Jon F McGreevy; Javier Gonzalez Del Rey; Tanvi Sharma; Catherine Michelson; Alan Schwartz
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-08

3.  Analysis of Milestone-based End-of-rotation Evaluations for Ten Residents Completing a Three-year Anesthesiology Residency.

Authors:  Chloe M Chemtob; Pedro Tanaka; Martin Keil; Alex Macario
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-08-24

Review 4.  The effects of graduate competency-based education and mastery learning on patient care and return on investment: a narrative review of basic anesthetic procedures.

Authors:  Claus Hedebo Bisgaard; Sune Leisgaard Mørck Rubak; Svein Aage Rodt; Jens Aage Kølsen Petersen; Peter Musaeus
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Shadowing emergency medicine residents by medical education specialists to provide feedback on non-medical knowledge-based ACGME sub-competencies.

Authors:  Anna L Waterbrook; Karen C Spear Ellinwood; T Gail Pritchard; Karen Bertels; Ariel C Johnson; Alice Min; Lisa R Stoneking
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.