Literature DB >> 17690934

Determinants of complications and adequacy of surgical resection in laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma.

B Topal1, E Leys, N Ectors, R Aerts, F Penninckx.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in the treatment of gastric cancer is controversial. The present study analyzed the morbidity and adequacy of resection in LTG versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) for gastric adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, clinical data of 38 consecutive patients who underwent LTG for gastric adenocarcinoma were collected prospectively. The same data-entry form was used for retrospective data collection from 22 consecutive patients who underwent OTG within the same time period. Logistic regression models were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the optimally combined factors related to the occurrence of postoperative complications and to the number of harvested lymph nodes.
RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 24 patients with subsequent mortality in two. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 11 (6-73) days and comparable after LTG versus OTG (p = 0.847). The occurrence of postoperative complications was related (p = 0.004) to the first year of surgery and patients' medical condition before surgery [American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III]. Microscopic tumor-free margins were obtained in all but two patients. The number of harvested lymph nodes was 17 (0-90), and determined by tumor wall penetration (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of complications after total gastrectomy is determined by the patients' medical condition before surgery and the surgical expertise, but not by the approach. LTG and OTG can result in adequate tumor-free resection margins and lymph node yield, which is related to the tumor wall penetration. The role of LTG in gastric cancer needs further evaluation in randomized controlled trials with large patient series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17690934     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9549-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  The volume-outcome relationship in cancer surgery: a hard sell.

Authors:  Ingemar Ihse
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Gastrointestinal recovery and outcome after laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Erito Mochiki; Toshihiro Nakabayashi; Hitoshi Kamimura; Norihiro Haga; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J Esteban Varela; Michael Hiyashi; Tien Nguyen; Allen Sabio; Samuel E Wilson; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Morbidity and mortality after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group prospective multicenter surgical study.

Authors:  M Degiuli; M Sasako; A Ponti; T Soldati; F Danese; F Calvo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Ichiro Uyama; Kenichi Sugihara; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Surgical outcome of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  M-C Kim; H-H Kim; G-J Jung
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Laparoscopic and open gastric resections for malignant lesions: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  J-L Dulucq; P Wintringer; C Stabilini; L Solinas; J Perissat; A Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  The role of surgery in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Peter McCulloch
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.043

9.  Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy.

Authors:  Y Adachi; T Suematsu; N Shiraishi; T Katsuta; A Morimoto; S Kitano; K Akazawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  49 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pilot series.

Authors:  Evelyn L Kachikwu; Vijay Trisal; Joseph Kim; Alessio Pigazzi; Joshua D I Ellenhorn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Survival and surgical outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: case-control study.

Authors:  Bang Wool Eom; Young-Woo Kim; Sang Eok Lee; Keun Won Ryu; Jun Ho Lee; Hong Man Yoon; Soo-Jeong Cho; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Soo Jin Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of single-stapling and hemi-double-stapling methods for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masataka Amisaki; Kyoichi Kihara; Kanenori Endo; Kazunori Suzuki; Seiichi Nakamura; Takashi Sawata; Tetsu Shimizu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Eleven-year experience with 3000 cases of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in a single institution: analysis of postoperative morbidities and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Young Suk Park; Sang-Yong Son; Aung Myint Oo; Do Hyun Jung; Dong Joon Shin; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yian Du; Xiangdong Cheng; Zhiyuan Xu; Litao Yang; Ling Huang; Bing Wang; Pengfei Yu; Ruizeng Dong
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weizhi Wang; Zheng Li; Jie Tang; Meilin Wang; Baolin Wang; Zekuan Xu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Xiong; Quentin M Nunes; Wei Huang; Chun-Lu Tan; Neng-Wen Ke; Si-Ming Xie; Xun Ran; Hao Zhang; Yong-Hua Chen; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Aortoenteric fistula at the site of esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: report of a case.

Authors:  Shutaro Gunji; Hiroshi Okabe; Kazutaka Obama; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Comparison of invasiveness between laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hideki Kawamura; Ryoichi Yokota; Shigenori Homma; Yukifumi Kondo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Systematic review of anastomotic complications of esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mikito Inokuchi; Sho Otsuki; Yoshitaka Fujimori; Yuya Sato; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Kazuyuki Kojima
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.