Literature DB >> 27287768

Frequency of gamma H2AX foci in healthy volunteers and health workers occupationally exposed to X-irradiation and its relevance in biological dosimetry.

Venkateswarlu Raavi1, Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen1, Vijayalakshmi Jagannathan1, Santosh Joseph2, Nabo Kumar Chaudhury3, Perumal Venkatachalam4.   

Abstract

Gamma-H2AX (γ-H2AX) assay is a marker to measure double-strand breaks in the deoxyribonucleic acid. Variables such as age, oxidative stress, temperature, genetic factors and inter-individual variation have been reported to influence the baseline γ-H2AX focus levels. Therefore, knowledge on baseline frequency of γ-H2AX foci in a targeted population would facilitate reliable radiation triage and dose estimation. The objective of the present study was to establish the baseline data using blood samples from healthy volunteers (n = 130) differing in age, occupation and lifestyle as well as from occupationally exposed health workers (n = 20). The γ-H2AX focus assay was performed using epifluorescence microscopy. In vitro dose-response curve for γ-H2AX foci was constructed in blood samples (n = 3) exposed to X-rays (30 min post-exposure). The mean γ-H2AX focus frequency obtained in healthy volunteers was 0.042 ± 0.001 and showed an age-related increase (p < 0.001). Significantly higher (p < 0.005) focus frequencies were observed in health workers (0.066 ± 0.005) than in healthy volunteers. A sub-group analysis did not show a significant (p > 0.1) difference in γ-H2AX focus frequency among sexes. Blood exposed in vitro to X-rays showed dose-dependent increase in γ-H2AX foci frequency (Y = 0.1902 ± 0.1363 + 2.9020 ± 0.3240 * D). Baseline frequency of γ-H2AX foci obtained from different age groups showed a significant (p < 0.01) influence on the dose-response coefficients. The overall results demonstrated that the γ-H2AX assay can be used as a reliable biomarker for radiation triage and estimating the radiation absorbed dose by considering variables such as age, occupation and lifestyle factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodosimetry; Occupational exposure; X-irradiation; γ-H2AX foci

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27287768     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-016-0658-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  44 in total

Review 1.  Limitations associated with analysis of cytogenetic data for biological dosimetry.

Authors:  Volodymyr A Vinnikov; Elizabeth A Ainsbury; Nataliya A Maznyk; David C Lloyd; Kai Rothkamm
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Mean frequency and relative fluorescence intensity measurement of γ-H2AX foci dose response in PBL exposed to γ-irradiation: An inter- and intra-laboratory comparison and its relevance for radiation triage.

Authors:  Raavi Venkateswarlu; Selvan G Tamizh; Manivannan Bhavani; Arun Kumar; Amit Alok; Kanagaraj Karthik; Namita Kalra; J Vijayalakshmi; Solomon F D Paul; N K Chaudhury; Perumal Venkatachalam
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Fenech; A A Morley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Chromosomal analysis to assess radiation dose.

Authors:  D C Lloyd
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  DNA double-strand breaks and their repair in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing angiographic procedures.

Authors:  Michael A Kuefner; Saskia Grudzenski; Siegfried A Schwab; Melanie Wiederseiner; Martina Heckmann; Werner Bautz; Markus Lobrich; Michael Uder
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  The use of gamma-H2AX as a biodosimeter for total-body radiation exposure in non-human primates.

Authors:  Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Ksenia Gouliaeva; Arifur Rahman; William F Blakely; William M Bonner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Senescing human cells and ageing mice accumulate DNA lesions with unrepairable double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Olga A Sedelnikova; Izumi Horikawa; Drazen B Zimonjic; Nicholas C Popescu; William M Bonner; J Carl Barrett
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid '96 well lyse/fix' protocol with a routine method.

Authors:  Jayne Moquet; Stephen Barnard; Kai Rothkamm
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  An optimized method for detecting gamma-H2AX in blood cells reveals a significant interindividual variation in the gamma-H2AX response among humans.

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Tabasum Imran Wadhra; Ola Hammarsten
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Smoking cessation reverses DNA double-strand breaks in human mononuclear cells.

Authors:  Mari Ishida; Takafumi Ishida; Satoshi Tashiro; Hitomi Uchida; Chiemi Sakai; Naoya Hironobe; Katsuya Miura; Yu Hashimoto; Koji Arihiro; Kazuaki Chayama; Yasuki Kihara; Masao Yoshizumi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Measurement of γ-H2AX foci, miRNA-101, and gene expression as a means to quantify radiation-absorbed dose in cancer patients who had undergone radiotherapy.

Authors:  Venkateswarlu Raavi; J Surendran; K Karthik; Solomon F D Paul; K Thayalan; J Arunakaran; Perumal Venkatachalam
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?

Authors:  Niels Belmans; Anne Caroline Oenning; Benjamin Salmon; Bjorn Baselet; Kevin Tabury; Stéphane Lucas; Ivo Lambrichts; Marjan Moreels; Reinhilde Jacobs; Sarah Baatout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.