Literature DB >> 30467642

Measurement of γ-H2AX foci, miRNA-101, and gene expression as a means to quantify radiation-absorbed dose in cancer patients who had undergone radiotherapy.

Venkateswarlu Raavi1, J Surendran2, K Karthik1, Solomon F D Paul1, K Thayalan2, J Arunakaran3, Perumal Venkatachalam4.   

Abstract

Radiological accidents and nuclear terrorism pose an increased threat to members of the public who, following such an event, would need to be assessed for medical care by fast triage. Assay methods such as chromosome aberrations (CA), cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques have been well established for dose estimation and their potential for handling more samples has also been proved with automation. However, culturing of lymphocytes is an inevitable step, which limits the potential of these markers for triage. In vitro analysis of gamma-H2AX (γ-H2AX), gene and microRNA (miRNA) markers do not require culturing of lymphocytes, and as such have been suggested as attractive tools for triage. Despite studies reporting in vitro dose-response curves, limited evidence is available evaluating the suitability of these assays in real situations. In this study, we have measured the absorbed dose using γ-H2AX, gene (GADD45A, FDXR, and CDKN1A) and miRNA-101 expression in blood samples of cancer patients (n = 20) who had undergone partial-body radiotherapy and compared with the derived equivalent whole-body doses (EWBD). The obtained results from all patients showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase of γ-H2AX foci in post-irradiated as compared to pre-irradiated samples. Moreover, estimated doses using γ-H2AX foci showed a correlation with the derived EWBD (r2 = 0.60, p = 0.0003) and was also shown to be dependent on the irradiated body volume. Consistent with γ-H2AX foci frequency, an increase in fold change expression of genes and miRNA-101 was observed. However, the estimated dose significantly varied among the subjects and showed poor correlation (r2 = 0.09, 0.04, 0.01 and 0.03 for GADD45A, FDXR, CDKN1A and miRNA-101, respectively) with EWBD. The overall results suggest that the established in vitro γ-H2AX assay is suitable for the detection of radiation exposure and can also provide an estimate of the dose in in vivo irradiated samples. The genes and miRNA-101 markers showed increased expression; nevertheless, there is a need for further improvements to measure doses accurately using these markers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Gene expression; MicroRNA; Radiotherapy; γ-H2AX foci

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467642     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0767-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  38 in total

Review 1.  Limitations associated with analysis of cytogenetic data for biological dosimetry.

Authors:  Volodymyr A Vinnikov; Elizabeth A Ainsbury; Nataliya A Maznyk; David C Lloyd; Kai Rothkamm
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ainsbury; David C Lloyd
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Analysis of Saliva Gene Expression during Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jerome Lacombe; Carla Brooks; Chengcheng Hu; Emmanuel Menashi; Ronald Korn; Farley Yang; Frederic Zenhausern
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Comparable dose estimates of blinded whole blood samples are obtained independently of culture conditions and analytical approaches. Second RENEB gene expression study.

Authors:  Grainne Manning; Ellina Macaeva; Matthaeus Majewski; Ralf Kriehuber; Kamil Brzóska; Michael Abend; Sven Doucha-Senf; Dominik Oskamp; Sonja Strunz; Roel Quintens; Matthias Port; Christophe Badie
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Flow cytometric analysis of phosphorylated histone H2AX following exposure to ionizing radiation in human microvascular endothelial cells.

Authors:  Yasushi Kataoka; Vytautas P Bindokas; Ryan C Duggan; Jeffrey S Murley; David J Grdina
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Validating Baboon Ex Vivo and In Vivo Radiation-Related Gene Expression with Corresponding Human Data.

Authors:  M Port; M Majewski; F Herodin; M Valente; M Drouet; F Forcheron; A Tichy; I Sirak; A Zavrelova; A Malkova; B V Becker; D A Veit; S Waldeck; C Badie; G O'Brien; H Christiansen; J Wichmann; M Eder; G Beutel; J Vachelova; S Doucha-Senf; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  gamma-H2AX foci formation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of tumor patients after local radiotherapy to different sites of the body: dependence on the dose-distribution, irradiated site and time from start of treatment.

Authors:  Ali Sak; Sara Grehl; Patricia Erichsen; Marianne Engelhard; Andreas Grannass; Sabine Levegrün; Christoph Pöttgen; Michael Groneberg; Martin Stuschke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  γ-H2AX as a biomarker of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and artificial skin.

Authors:  Christophe E Redon; Jennifer S Dickey; William M Bonner; Olga A Sedelnikova
Journal:  Adv Space Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.152

9.  Radiation dose-rate effects on gene expression for human biodosimetry.

Authors:  Shanaz A Ghandhi; Lubomir B Smilenov; Carl D Elliston; Mashkura Chowdhury; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  HEMODOSE: A Biodosimetry Tool Based on Multi-type Blood Cell Counts.

Authors:  Shaowen Hu; William F Blakely; Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  1 in total

1.  Changes in patient peripheral blood cell microRNAs after total body irradiation during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Juan-Juan Li; Lei Xu; Cheng-Long Wang; Jing-Wen Niu; Xuan Zou; Xuan-Qi Feng; Rong-Jian Lu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.