OBJECTIVES: To adapt gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy to assessment of induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients undergoing angiographic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. After written informed patient consents were obtained, venous blood samples were taken from 19 patients (age 23-88 years) undergoing different angiographic procedures before, during, and after (10 minutes-24 hours) the examination. Individual DSB yields were visualized by detecting the phosphorylated variant of the histone H2AX (gamma-H2AX) in lymphocytes using fluorescence microscopy. Values were correlated with dose area product. Single in vitro irradiation with 50 mGy was performed in 14 and additional fractionated irradiation with 10 x 5 mGy over a time period corresponding to the angiography duration in 4 patients. The radiation doses to the blood delivered during angiography were estimated by comparing the number of DSBs after angiography with DSB yields obtained after in vitro irradiation. RESULTS: In all patients in vivo and in vitro irradiation increased the number of DSBs (0.03-1.50 per cell), even if very small doses were applied (minimum 338 microGy x m). Thereafter in both in vitro and in vivo a rapid loss of gamma-H2AX foci was observed. The number of DSBs showed a linear correlation to dose area product for specific examination regions (eg, R = 0.85, pelvic and leg arteries). Calculated radiation doses to blood delivered during angiography ranged from 2.2 to 99.9 mGy and increased if fractioned in vitro samples were used as calibration instead of single in vitro irradiations at the same total dose. CONCLUSIONS: gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy is a reliable and sensitive method for measuring the induction and repair of DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation during angiography. To estimate radiation doses delivered during procedures and to consider patients individual repair capacity, postangiography DSB-yields should be compared with DSB-yields after fractioned in vitro irradiation imitating examination conditions.
OBJECTIVES: To adapt gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy to assessment of induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients undergoing angiographic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. After written informed patient consents were obtained, venous blood samples were taken from 19 patients (age 23-88 years) undergoing different angiographic procedures before, during, and after (10 minutes-24 hours) the examination. Individual DSB yields were visualized by detecting the phosphorylated variant of the histone H2AX (gamma-H2AX) in lymphocytes using fluorescence microscopy. Values were correlated with dose area product. Single in vitro irradiation with 50 mGy was performed in 14 and additional fractionated irradiation with 10 x 5 mGy over a time period corresponding to the angiography duration in 4 patients. The radiation doses to the blood delivered during angiography were estimated by comparing the number of DSBs after angiography with DSB yields obtained after in vitro irradiation. RESULTS: In all patients in vivo and in vitro irradiation increased the number of DSBs (0.03-1.50 per cell), even if very small doses were applied (minimum 338 microGy x m). Thereafter in both in vitro and in vivo a rapid loss of gamma-H2AX foci was observed. The number of DSBs showed a linear correlation to dose area product for specific examination regions (eg, R = 0.85, pelvic and leg arteries). Calculated radiation doses to blood delivered during angiography ranged from 2.2 to 99.9 mGy and increased if fractioned in vitro samples were used as calibration instead of single in vitro irradiations at the same total dose. CONCLUSIONS: gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy is a reliable and sensitive method for measuring the induction and repair of DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation during angiography. To estimate radiation doses delivered during procedures and to consider patients individual repair capacity, postangiography DSB-yields should be compared with DSB-yields after fractioned in vitro irradiation imitating examination conditions.
Authors: M A Kuefner; S Grudzenski; J Hamann; S Achenbach; Michael Lell; K Anders; S A Schwab; L Häberle; M Löbrich; M Uder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Eller; M Wiesmüller; W Wüst; R Heiss; M Kopp; M Saake; M Brand; M Uder; M M May Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nico Ruprecht; Martin N Hungerbühler; Ingrid B Böhm; Johannes T Heverhagen Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2019-02-24 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Ksenia Gouliaeva; Arifur Rahman; William F Blakely; William M Bonner Journal: Radiat Meas Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 1.898
Authors: Christophe E Redon; Urbain Weyemi; Palak R Parekh; Dejun Huang; Allison S Burrell; William M Bonner Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2012-03-09
Authors: Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Ksenia Gouliaeva; Arifur Rahman; William F Blakely; William M Bonner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jennifer S Dickey; Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Brandon J Baird; Olga A Sedelnikova; William M Bonner Journal: Chromosoma Date: 2009-08-26 Impact factor: 4.316