Literature DB >> 16598403

The utility of pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies in idiopathic incontinence.

Rocco Ricciardi1, Anders F Mellgren, Robert D Madoff, Nancy N Baxter, Richard E Karulf, Susan C Parker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing has been used to test for pudendal neuropathy, but its value remains controversial. We sought to clarify the relationship of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency to sphincter pressure and level of continence in a cohort of patients with intact anal sphincters and normal pelvic floor anatomy.
METHODS: We reviewed 1,404 consecutive patients who were evaluated at our pelvic floor laboratory for fecal incontinence. From this group, 83 patients had intact anal sphincters on ultrasound and did not have internal or external rectal prolapse during defecography. These patients were evaluated by pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing, a standardized questionnaire, and anorectal manometry, which measured resting and squeeze anal pressures. Incontinence scores were calculated by using the American Medical Systems Fecal Incontinence Score. Values were compared by using the Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test; and significance was assigned at the P < 0.05 level.
RESULTS: 1) Using a 2.2-ms threshold, 28 percent of patients had prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency unilaterally and 12 percent bilaterally. 2) At a 2.4-ms threshold, 18 percent of patients had prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency unilaterally and 8 percent bilaterally. 3) Bilaterally prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was significantly associated with decreased maximum mean resting pressure and increased Fecal Incontinence Score, but not decreased maximum mean squeeze pressure, at both 2.2-ms and 2.4-ms thresholds. 4) Unilaterally prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was not associated with maximum mean resting pressure, maximum mean squeeze pressure, or fecal incontinence score at either threshold.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of incontinent patients with intact sphincters have normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Bilaterally but not unilaterally prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency is associated with poorer function and physiology in the incontinent patient with an intact sphincter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598403     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0529-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic transperineal ultrasonography correlates with prolonged pudendal nerve latency in female with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Luigi Brusciano; Claudio Gambardella; Bruno Roche; Salvatore Tolone; Roberto Maria Romano; Francesco Tuccillo; Gianmattia Del Genio; Gianmattia Terracciano; Giorgia Gualtieri; Ludovico Docimo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-06-28

2.  Transrectal ultrasound, manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal latency studies in the evaluation of sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Brooke Gurland; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

Review 3.  Diagnostic testing for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Craig H Olson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  [Anorectal diagnostics for proctological diseases].

Authors:  T Jackisch; H Witzigmann; S Stelzner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Does preoperative anal physiology testing or ultrasonography predict clinical outcome with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence?

Authors:  Yarini Quezada; James L Whiteside; Tracy Rice; Mickey Karram; Janice F Rafferty; Ian M Paquette
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Translumbosacral Anorectal Magnetic Stimulation Test for Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Yun Yan; Amol Sharma; Anam A Herekar; Enoe Jimenez; Amit R Hudgi; Qiaochu G Gu; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing does not provide useful information in guiding therapy for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Julia T Saraidaridis; George Molina; Lieba R Savit; Holly Milch; Tiffany Mei; Samantha Chin; James Kuo; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Pudendal nerve testing does not contribute to surgical decision making following anorectal testing in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Edward A Cooper; Katie J De-Loyde; Christopher J Young; Heather L Shepherd; Caroline Wright
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Hypothesized summative anal physiology score correlates but poorly predicts incontinence severity.

Authors:  Christopher J Young; Assad Zahid; Cherry E Koh; Jane M Young
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.