| Literature DB >> 27286036 |
Donghyun Jee1, Eun Chul Kim2, Eunyoung Cho3,4, Jorge G Arroyo5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and pterygium.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27286036 PMCID: PMC4902231 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow diagram showing the selection of study participants.
Demographic and clinical characteristics, according to pterygium status in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2011.
| Characteristics | No pterygium (n = 17630) | Pterygium (n = 1548) | Included (n = 19178) | no exam (n = 261) | Total (n = 19439) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.7 (0.3) | 51.9 (1.5) | .145 | 49.8 (0.3) | 54.5 (3.4) | .170 | 49.9 (0.3) | |
| 48.9 (0.1) | 61.7 (0.4) | < .001 | 49.7 (0.1) | 49.2 (0.9) | .645 | 49.5 (0.5) | |
| 23.8 (0.0) | 23.9 (0.1) | .329 | 23.8 (0.0) | 24.0 (0.2) | .549 | 23.9 (0.1) | |
| 119.3 (0.2) | 126.5 (0.6) | < .001 | 119.8 (0.2) | 121.0 (1.3) | .363 | 120.4 (0.7) | |
| 77.7 (0.1) | 78.4 (0.4) | .104 | 77.8 (0.1) | 79.2 (0.9) | .124 | 78.5 (0.4) | |
| 98.5 (0.2) | 102.1 (0.9) | < .001 | 98.7 (0.2) | 103.9 (2.2) | .023 | 101.3 (1.1) | |
| 6.0 (0.0) | 6.2 (0.1) | .012 | 6.1 (0.0) | 6.1 (0.1) | .542 | 6.1 (0.1) | |
| 190.9 (0.3) | 192.3 (1.2) | .254 | 191.0 (0.3) | 188.4 (2.6) | .342 | 189.7 (1.3) | |
| 142.3 (1.2) | 143.7 (3.1) | .684 | 142.4 (1.1) | 151.8 (8.7) | .282 | 147.1 (4.4) | |
| 18.5 (0.1) | 20.4 (0.2) | < .001 | 18.6 (0.1) | 18.0 (0.5) | .290 | 18.3 (0.3) | |
| 9.8 (0.3) | 14.6 (1.2) | < .001 | 10.1 (0.3) | 12.2 (2.5) | .390 | 10.2 (0.3) | |
| 31.0 (0.5) | 48.4 (1.7) | < .001 | 32.1 (0.5) | 33.9 (3.5) | .602 | 32.1 (0.5) | |
| < .001 | .715 | ||||||
| 19.6 (0.6) | 35.1 (1.9) | 20.6 (0.7) | 19.3 (3.5) | 20.6 (0.7) | |||
| | 80.4 (0.6) | 64.9 (1.9) | 79.4 (0.7) | 80.7 (3.5) | 79.4 (0.7) | ||
| .059 | .296 | ||||||
| | 52.2 (0.4) | 52.6 (1.5) | 52.2 (0.4) | 47.3 (3.8) | 52.2 (0.4) | ||
| | 12.0 (0.3) | 14.6 (1.1) | 12.2 (0.3) | 11.1 (2.6) | 12.2 (0.3) | ||
| 35.8 (0.5) | 32.8 (1.5) | 35.6 (0.4) | 41.6 (3.9) | 35.7 (0.4) |
Data are expressed as weighted means or weighted frequency (%) with standard errors.
Demographic and clinical characteristics by quintile blood 25-Hydroxyvitamin D categories among representative Korean adults aged 19 years or older.
| Characteristics | Quartile blood 25-Hydroxyvitamin D level (ng/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 13.0 | 13.0–16.3 | 16.3–19.6 | 19.6–24.3 | > 24.3 | P for trend | |
| 36.7 (0.9) | 43.4 (1.0) | 51.5 (0.9) | 56.8 (1.0) | 62.3 (0.9) | < .001 | |
| 48.0 (0.3) | 48.2 (0.2) | 48.8 (0.3) | 50.8 (0.3) | 53.1 (0.4) | < .001 | |
| 23.5 (0.1) | 24.0 (0.1) | 23.9 (0.1) | 24.1 (0.1) | 23.7 (0.1) | < .001 | |
| 118.6 (0.3) | 118.7 (0.3) | 119.3 (0.3) | 120.6 (0.3) | 121.8 (0.4) | < .001 | |
| 76.8 (0.2) | 77.5 (0.2) | 77.9 (0.2) | 78.4 (0.2) | 78.3 (0.2) | < .001 | |
| 98.1 (0.5) | 97.7 (0.4) | 99.7 (0.5) | 98.7 (0.4) | 99.5 (0.4) | .010 | |
| 6.1 (0.0) | 5.9 (0.0) | 6.1 (0.0) | 6.0 (0.0) | 6.2 (0.1) | .001 | |
| 189.0 (0.7) | 190.7 (0.7) | 191.9 (0.7) | 193.2 (0.7) | 190.0 (0.6) | < .001 | |
| 143.3 (2.9) | 146.4 (2.7) | 140.5 (2.3) | 143.1 (2.3) | 138.4 (1.8) | .147 | |
| 9.8 (0.6) | 8.8 (0.6) | 10.4 (0.6) | 10.1 (0.6) | 11.1 (0.6) | .031 | |
| 29.3 (0.9) | 29.9 (0.9) | 30.4 (0.9) | 34.3 (1.0) | 37.2 (1.0) | < .001 | |
| < .001 | ||||||
| | 87.7 (0.7) | 85.9 (0.8) | 82.3 (0.9) | 74.9 (1.2) | 64.4 (1.6) | |
| | 12.3 (0.7) | 14.1 (0.8) | 17.7 (0.9) | 25.1 (1.2) | 35.6 (1.6) | |
| < .001 | ||||||
| | 60.3 (1.0) | 55.8 (1.0) | 52.3 (1.0) | 48.0 (1.0) | 43.7 (1.0) | |
| | 8.8 (0.6) | 11.8 (0.7) | 13.2 (0.6) | 15.1 (0.8) | 12.1 (0.8) | |
| | 30.9 (1.0) | 32.3 (1.0) | 34.6 (0.9) | 36.9 (1.1) | 44.1 (1.1) | |
Association between blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D and prevalence of pterygium among representative Korean adults.
| Vitamin D quintiles (ng/mL) | Case/total number | Prevalence | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quintile 1 (<13.0) | 205/3845 | 4.4 (0.4) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) |
| Quintile 2 (13.0–16.3) | 243/3833 | 5.1 (0.4) | 1.17 (0.94–1.47) | 1.20 (0.96–1.52) | 1.20 (0.95–1.22) |
| Quintile 3 (16.3–19.6) | 291/3841 | 6.5 (0.5) | 1.50 (1.20–1.88) | 1.49 (1.18–1.88) | 1.39 (1.10–1.75) |
| Quintile 4 (19.6–24.3) | 366/3841 | 7.8 (0.6) | 1.84 (1.43–2.29) | 1.58 (1.26–1.98) | 1.48 (1.17–1.86) |
| Quintile 5 (>24.3) | 443/3828 | 9.2 (0.6) | 2.20 (1.75–2.77) | 1.63 (1.29–2.06) | 1.51 (1.19–1.92) |
| P for trend | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | |
| Quintile 1 (<14.3) | 91/1672 | 4.4 (0.5) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) |
| Quintile 2 (14.3–17.7) | 119/1666 | 5.3 (0.6) | 1.21 (0.87–1.70) | 1.23 (0.91–1.81) | 1.17 (0.83–1.66) |
| Quintile 3 (17.7–21.1) | 138/1665 | 6.8 (0.8) | 1.61 (1.14–2.27) | 1.50 (1.05–2.14) | 1.51 (1.05–2.19) |
| Quintile 4 (21.1–25.9) | 186/1667 | 8.6 (0.8) | 2.07 (1.51–2.83) | 1.78 (1.29–2.45) | 1.70 (1.21–2.38) |
| Quintile 5 (>25.9) | 211/1662 | 9.7 (0.9) | 2.35 (1.70–3.25) | 1.78 (1.28–2.49) | 1.68 (1.19–2.37) |
| P for trend | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | |
| Quintile 1 (<12.2) | 112/2169 | 4.5 (0.5) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) |
| Quintile 2 (12.2–15.2) | 130/2170 | 5.0 (0.5) | 1.11 (0.82–1.51) | 1.17 (0.84–1.62) | 1.15 (0.82–1.61) |
| Quintile 3 (15.2–18.3) | 144/2172 | 5.7 (0.6) | 1.29 (0.94–1.75) | 1.28 (0.93–1.76) | 1.18 (0.85–1.64) |
| Quintile 4 (18.3–22.7) | 189/2170 | 7.5 (0.7) | 1.71 (1.26–2.31) | 1.57 (1.15–2.15) | 1.43 (1.04–1.96) |
| Quintile 5 (>22.7) | 228/2165 | 8.9 (0.8) | 2.07 (1.54–2.79) | 1.53 (1.13–2.08) | 1.37 (1.00–1.88) |
| P for trend | < .001 | < .001 | .001 | .016 |
Prevalence was expressed as weighted estimates [%] (standard errors [%], 95% confidence intervals).
Model 1: Crude odds ratios. Model 2: adjusted for sex and age. Model 3: adjusted for sex, age, diabetes, hypertension, sunlight exposure time, smoking, and body mass index.
* p < 0.05
Fig 2The odds ratios of pterygium according to quintiles of blood vitamin D levels (reference group = lowest vitamin D quintile group).
Fig 3The comparison of odds ratios of ocular diseases including dry eye syndrome (DES), cataract, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), any diabetic retinopathy (DR), and vision-threatening DR (VTDR) according to the blood vitamin D levels (reference group = lowest vitamin D quintile group).