Literature DB >> 27284342

Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation during endoscopy: A meta-analysis.

Fan Zhang1, Hao-Rui Sun1, Ze-Bing Zheng2, Ren Liao1, Jin Liu1.   

Abstract

Patients undergoing endoscopy frequently require sedation, which commonly includes the administration of midazolam or dexmedetomidine. Previous meta-analyses have mainly focused on comparing the effects of these two drugs in intensive care unit patients. In the present study, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the sedative and clinical effectiveness of these two drugs in patients undergoing endoscopy were searched in a number of databases. The meta-analysis showed that dexmedetomidine demonstrated a significantly lower rate of respiratory depression and adverse events compared with those presented upon midazolam administration. A significant difference was also observed in the sedation potency of the sedatives. The current controlled data suggest that dexmedetomidine may be an alternative to midazolam in the sedation for endoscopy. However, more high-quality and well-designed studies are required to further evaluate this conclusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dexmedetomidine; endoscopy; meta-analysis; midazolam; sedation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27284342      PMCID: PMC4887952          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  44 in total

1.  A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation.

Authors:  Kamer Dere; Ilker Sucullu; Ersel Tan Budak; Suleyman Yeyen; Ali Ilker Filiz; Sezai Ozkan; Guner Dagli
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Occurrence and predictors of dexmedetomidine infusion intolerance and failure.

Authors:  Bethany R Tellor; Heather M Arnold; Scott T Micek; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2012-02

3.  Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

Authors:  D Moher; B Pham; A Jones; D J Cook; A R Jadad; M Moher; P Tugwell; T P Klassen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Enhanced CT and CT virtual endoscopy in diagnosis of heterotopic pancreas.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Xiao-Er Wei; Lei Yan; Yu-Zhen Zhang; Wen-Bin Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Sedation assessment using the Ramsay scale.

Authors:  Rachel Dawson; Nicholas von Fintel; Stuart Nairn
Journal:  Emerg Nurse       Date:  2010-06

Review 6.  [Dexmedetomidine. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics].

Authors:  H Ihmsen; T I Saari
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Attentional effects of noradrenaline vary with arousal level: selective activation of thalamic pulvinar in humans.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Matt E P Jones; Talmage D Egan; Chris D Frith; Mervyn Maze
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Comparison of sedation effectiveness of remifentanil-dexmedetomidine and remifentanil-midazolam combinations and their effects on postoperative cognitive functions in cystoscopies: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ayse Hande Arpaci; Fusun Bozkırlı
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 9.  Dexmedetomidine: an adjuvant making large inroads into clinical practice.

Authors:  Sj Bajwa; A Kulshrestha
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-10

10.  Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for conscious sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: An open-label randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Priyanka Sethi; Sadik Mohammed; Pradeep Kumar Bhatia; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  New sedatives and analgesic drugs for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Jae Min Lee; Yehyun Park; Jin Myung Park; Hong Jun Park; Jun Yong Bae; Seung Young Seo; Jee Hyun Lee; Hyung Ku Chon; Jun-Won Chung; Hyun Ho Choi; Jun Kyu Lee; Byung-Wook Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-08-29

2.  Comparison of the Sedation Quality of Etomidate, Propofol, and Midazolam in Combination with Fentanyl During Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Leili Adinehmehr; Hamidreza Shetabi; Darioush Moradi Farsani; Ali Salehi; Mohadese Noorbakhsh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-04-27

3.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine-propofol and ketamine-propofol administration during sedation-guided upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy.

Authors:  Arzu Esen Tekeli; Ali Kendal Oğuz; Yunus Emre Tunçdemir; Necat Almali
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Effect of dexmedetomidine in the prophylactic endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for oesophageal varices: a study protocol for prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Hiroki Nishikawa; Yoshinori Iwata; Akio Ishii; Hirayuki Enomoto; Yukihisa Yuri; Noriko Ishii; Yuho Miyamoto; Kunihiro Hasegawa; Chikage Nakano; Ryo Takata; Takashi Nishimura; Kazunori Yoh; Nobuhiro Aizawa; Yoshiyuki Sakai; Naoto Ikeda; Tomoyuki Takashima; Hiroko Iijima; Shuhei Nishiguchi
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Efficacy of dexmedetomidine-ketamine vs. fentanylketamine on saturated oxygen, hemodynamic responses and sedation in cystoscopy: a doubleblinded randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Hesameddin Modir; Esmail Moshiri; Bijan Yazdi; Tannaz Kamalpour; Davood Goodarzi; Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.