Literature DB >> 22406894

Occurrence and predictors of dexmedetomidine infusion intolerance and failure.

Bethany R Tellor1, Heather M Arnold, Scott T Micek, Marin H Kollef.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2 adrenergic receptor agonist, exhibits sedative, analgesic, anxiolytic, and sympatholytic effects, and may aid in controlling agitation in the intensive care unit (ICU). At our hospital (Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO), dexmedetomidine is commonly used as a sedative in the medical ICU. Predictors of dexmedetomidine intolerance or failure have not yet been defined.
OBJECTIVE: Describe the rate of dexmedetomidine infusion intolerance/failure and identify patient predictors of intolerance/failure.
METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated 75 mechanically ventilated adults who received dexmedetomidine infusion. Patients were included in the study if they were aged ≥ 18 years; mechanically ventilated for > 24 hours; received dexmedetomidine infusion for ≥ 1 hour following > 24 hours of continuous infusions of midazolam, fentanyl, or propofol; and were admitted to our medical ICU between August 1, 2009 and August 1, 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of intolerance/failure.
RESULTS: A total of 85 episodes of dexmedetomidine infusion were analyzed (75 total patients). Eighteen episodes (21%) met the criteria for intolerance/failure and 67 episodes (79%) met the criteria for tolerance/success. The median duration of mechanical ventilation, total dexmedetomidine infusion time, and ICU length of stay did not differ between groups. Nonblack race was the only variable independently associated with treatment failure or intolerance in the logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSION: Twenty-one percent of dexmedetomidine infusion episodes met the criteria for intolerance/failure. No predictors of intolerance/failure were found to be clinically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22406894     DOI: 10.3810/hp.2012.02.959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)        ISSN: 2154-8331


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of three sedation regimens for drug-induced sleep endoscopy.

Authors:  Jin Sun Cho; Sara Soh; Eun Jung Kim; Hyung-ju Cho; Seokyung Shin; Hye Jin Kim; Bon-Nyeo Koo
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Patient predictors of dexmedetomidine effectiveness for sedation in intensive care units.

Authors:  Pamela L Smithburger; Randall B Smith; Sandra L Kane-Gill; Philip E Empey
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation during endoscopy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao-Rui Sun; Ze-Bing Zheng; Ren Liao; Jin Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine.

Authors:  Maud A S Weerink; Michel M R F Struys; Laura N Hannivoort; Clemens R M Barends; Anthony R Absalom; Pieter Colin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Interpatient variability in dexmedetomidine response: a survey of the literature.

Authors:  Samantha F Holliday; Sandra L Kane-Gill; Philip E Empey; Mitchell S Buckley; Pamela L Smithburger
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-16

6.  Clinical study of midazolam sequential with dexmedetomidine for agitated patients undergoing weaning to implement light sedation in intensive care unit.

Authors:  Xing Lu; Jun Li; Tong Li; Jie Zhang; Zhi-Bo Li; Xin-Jing Gao; Lei Xu
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-01

7.  The effect of alpha-2A adrenergic receptor (ADRA2A) genetic polymorphisms on the depth of sedation of dexmedetomidine: a genetic observational pilot study.

Authors:  Yoon Ji Choi; Kyu Hee Park; Ju Yeon Park; Won Kee Min; Yoon Sook Lee
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.