Literature DB >> 27278544

Sustaining Chicago's Informal Caregivers: an Age-Friendly Approach.

Rebecca Johnson1, Jon Hofacker2, Lara Boyken3, Amy Eisenstein4.   

Abstract

The concept of age-friendliness has been globally coined by the World Health Organization (WHO) to give value to the physical, social, and environmental factors that can promote or hinder older residents' ability to age in place in cities. The initiative has been very successful in raising awareness among public health policy makers about the generic needs of older adults and urban features that promote active aging. However, the movement has been less focused on highlighting divergent needs of different older adult populations and their informal caregivers. The objective of this mixed method study is to analyze the ratings of 397 caregivers of urban age-friendly features relative to the ratings of 1737 noncaregivers collected as part of a baseline assessment of the age-friendliness of the city of Chicago. Using the approved WHO Vancouver Protocol, the research team also conducted six mixed caregiver/noncaregiver focus groups (n = 84) and three caregiver-only focus groups (n = 21). Survey findings show that informal caregivers rate all eight age-friendly domains with less satisfaction than do noncaregivers. Discussion in focus groups highlighted some of the reasons for these less favorable ratings and foregrounded the domains and themes that mattered most to caregivers. In conclusion, while our study revealed few systematic differences between caregiver and noncaregiver survey satisfaction ratings, caregivers report significantly poorer health than do noncaregivers. In addition, caregiver-only focus groups foregrounded "missing" priority issues specific to caregivers such as respite and the quality of training and flexibility of home help care. Results suggest that one productive next step for researchers would be to widen the usual range of factors considered essential for maintaining the well-being of informal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults. The age-friendly domains provide a starting point for this. Another would be to develop integrated support and improve service responsiveness to particular caregiver/care recipient dyad's physical, psychological, and social needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-friendly city; Baseline assessment, community wide survey; Informal caregiver

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27278544      PMCID: PMC4987586          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-016-0058-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  22 in total

Review 1.  How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Silvia Sörensen; Martin Pinquart; Paul Duberstein
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2002-06

2.  Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.

Authors:  Werner B F Brouwer; N Job A van Exel; Bernard van den Berg; Geertruidis A M van den Bos; Marc A Koopmanschap
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-01-08       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Do age-friendly characteristics influence the expectation to age in place? A comparison of low-income and higher income Detroit elders.

Authors:  Amanda J Lehning; Richard J Smith; Ruth E Dunkle
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-04-15

4.  Historical overview.

Authors:  Andrew Scharlach
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.220

5.  Examining the relationship between communities' 'age-friendliness' and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada.

Authors:  Verena H Menec; Scott Nowicki
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

Authors:  David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Interventions for caregivers of patients with dementia.

Authors:  Manuel Martín-Carrasco; Javier Ballesteros-Rodríguez; Ana I Domínguez-Panchón; Paula Muñoz-Hermoso; Eduardo González-Fraile
Journal:  Actas Esp Psiquiatr       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.196

8.  Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study.

Authors:  R Schulz; S R Beach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Conceptualizing age-friendly community characteristics in a sample of urban elders: an exploratory factor analysis.

Authors:  Richard J Smith; Amanda J Lehning; Ruth E Dunkle
Journal:  J Gerontol Soc Work       Date:  2013

10.  The effect of caregiver support interventions for informal caregivers of community-dwelling frail elderly: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maja Lopez-Hartmann; Johan Wens; Veronique Verhoeven; Roy Remmen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.120

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sustaining Chicago's Informal Caregivers: an Age-Friendly Approach.

Authors:  Rebecca Johnson; Jon Hofacker; Lara Boyken; Amy Eisenstein
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Informal Caregiving in a Medically Underserved Community: Challenges, Construction of Meaning, and the Caregiver-Recipient Dyad.

Authors:  Rita Gorawara-Bhat; Jeffrey Graupner; Jason Molony; Katherine Thompson
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2019-04-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.