Literature DB >> 24437338

Examining the relationship between communities' 'age-friendliness' and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada.

Verena H Menec1, Scott Nowicki2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Population aging is a worldwide phenomenon. As a response, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the concept of 'age-friendliness' in 2006. Age-friendliness is defined in terms of a range of domains, such as housing, opportunities for participation, and transportation. Communities that accommodate the needs of older adults in these domains will, it is thought, promote healthy, active aging. The purpose of the present study was to examine communities' age-friendliness and its relationship to health-related outcomes in a rural context.
METHODS: The study included 29 communities located in Manitoba, a mid-Western Canadian province, that are part of the Province of Manitoba's Age-Friendly Manitoba Initiative. As part of a needs assessment process in these communities, 593 individuals, including seniors and younger adults, completed an Age-Friendly Survey. The survey was designed to measure a variety of features in seven domains (the physical environment, housing options, the social environment, opportunities for participation, community supports and healthcare services, transportation options, and communication and information), as well as containing measures of life satisfaction and self-perceived health. Community characteristics were derived from census data. Moreover, communities were categorized on a rural-urban continuum.
RESULTS: Multi-level regressions indicated that an overall Age-Friendly Index was positively related to both life satisfaction (b=0.019, p<0.0001) and self-perceived health (b=0.013, p<0.01). When examining more specifically each of the seven age-friendly domains, all but housing was positively related to life satisfaction. Results were not as consistent for self-perceived health, with significant relationships emerging only for the physical environment, social environment, opportunities for participation, and transportation options. A subsequent analysis for seniors versus younger participants, respectively, indicated that significant relationships between age-friendly domains and life satisfaction and self-perceived health were restricted primarily to seniors. None of the community characteristics were related to life satisfaction and self-perceived health, nor was degree of rurality.
CONCLUSIONS: The concept of age-friendliness has been garnering considerable attention from policy-makers as a way to promote healthy aging. For example, in Canada, several provinces have launched age-friendly initiatives. Although causality cannot be inferred from the present, cross-sectional study, the findings are encouraging as they show that age-friendliness is associated with enhanced life satisfaction and self-perceived health in a rural context. The study further supports the notion that a wide range of domains within the community environment are important in older adults' lives and need to be considered. Public policy initiatives, such as the Province of Manitoba's Age-Friendly Initiative, may thus be one approach to enhancing healthy aging in rural settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24437338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rural Remote Health        ISSN: 1445-6354            Impact factor:   1.759


  19 in total

1.  Age-Friendly Features in Home and Community and the Self-Reported Health and Functional Limitation of Older Adults: the Role of Supportive Environments.

Authors:  Yeon Jin Choi
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Sustaining Chicago's Informal Caregivers: an Age-Friendly Approach.

Authors:  Rebecca Johnson; Jon Hofacker; Lara Boyken; Amy Eisenstein
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Association between Age-Friendliness of Communities and Frailty among Older Adults: A Multilevel Analysis.

Authors:  Jixiang Xu; Yingwei Chen; Yujie Wang; Junling Gao; Limei Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  The influence mechanism of community-built environment on the health of older adults: from the perspective of low-income groups.

Authors:  Zhenhua Zheng; Wanting Liu; Yingchen Lu; Ning Sun; Yusu Chu; Hong Chen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.070

5.  Convivialité des municipalités canadiennes à l'égard des aînés : portrait et facteurs associés.

Authors:  Catherine St-Pierre; Louis Braverman; Marie-France Dubois; Mélanie Levasseur
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2022-04-05

6.  Capturing how age-friendly communities foster positive health, social participation and health equity: a study protocol of key components and processes that promote population health in aging Canadians.

Authors:  Mélanie Levasseur; Marie-France Dubois; Mélissa Généreux; Verena Menec; Parminder Raina; Mathieu Roy; Catherine Gabaude; Yves Couturier; Catherine St-Pierre
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Effects of Perceived Neighbourhood Environments on Self-Rated Health among Community-Dwelling Older Chinese.

Authors:  Moses Wong; Ruby Yu; Jean Woo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Examining Stakeholder Perspectives: Process, Performance and Progress of the Age-Friendly Taiwan Program.

Authors:  Li-Ju Lin; Yu-Chang Hsu; Andrew E Scharlach; Hsien-Wen Kuo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Transfer of Promotion Effects on Elderly Health with Age: From Physical Environment to Interpersonal Environment and Social Participation.

Authors:  Zhenhua Zheng; Hong Chen; Liu Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The private healthcare market and the sustainability of an innovative community nurses programme based on social entrepreneurship - CoNSENSo project.

Authors:  Roberto Ippoliti; Greta Falavigna; Floriana Montani; Silvia Rizzi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.