Duzgun Yildirim1, Mutlu Sahin2, Onur Tutar3, Huseyin Kayadibi4, Ahmet Kaur5, Ali Kagan Coskun2, Terman Gumus6. 1. Centermed Advanced Imaging Center, Güzelbahce Street. No: 15, Nisantasi, Sisli, Istanbul. yduzgun@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Pasarow Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA. 5. Laboratory of E-Cytopathology, Valikonagi Street, No: 159/4, Istanbul, Turkey. 6. Department of Radiology, Amerikan Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Nipple retraction is difficult to diagnose radiologically and extremely worrisome for patients. It occurs most commonly due to pathologies such as previous mastitis or an infiltrative malignancy. With this in mind, the goal of this study was to differentiate benign from malignant lesions of nipple retraction, using the differential characteristics of retroareolar area stiffness, observed by means of the new technological modality of ultrasound elastography (USE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen unilateral nipple retraction cases, including five cases of mammary ductal carcinoma posteriorly infiltrated the areola, two cases of Paget disease, and 12 cases of mastitis, were investigated. Imaging findings [gray-scale ultrasound (US) and USE analyses of the breasts' nipple-areolar complex], pathological evaluation, and the results of 4 years of follow-up treatment were obtained. The recorded images were evaluated by two different radiologists, and all data were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that there was a strong correlation between the two radiologists' evaluations. The US images were not diagnostic for either the malignant or benign conditions. The correlation between the diagnosis using US and the final diagnosis was calculated as 0.436 (p = 0.006). However, the USE images were more informative since the correlation ratio between the USE results and the final diagnosis was found to be 0.723 (p < 0.001). While the area under the concentration curve (AUC) values that were used for the diagnostic determination of the US results were inconclusive at 0.274 (p < 0.021), the AUC values for USE were significant, with a diagnostic value of 0.866 for all cases (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The USE modality, which is not commonly used in routine practice, has the potential to solve the problem of differentiation of nipple retraction etiologies in the near future.
PURPOSE: Nipple retraction is difficult to diagnose radiologically and extremely worrisome for patients. It occurs most commonly due to pathologies such as previous mastitis or an infiltrative malignancy. With this in mind, the goal of this study was to differentiate benign from malignant lesions of nipple retraction, using the differential characteristics of retroareolar area stiffness, observed by means of the new technological modality of ultrasound elastography (USE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen unilateral nipple retraction cases, including five cases of mammary ductal carcinoma posteriorly infiltrated the areola, two cases of Paget disease, and 12 cases of mastitis, were investigated. Imaging findings [gray-scale ultrasound (US) and USE analyses of the breasts' nipple-areolar complex], pathological evaluation, and the results of 4 years of follow-up treatment were obtained. The recorded images were evaluated by two different radiologists, and all data were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that there was a strong correlation between the two radiologists' evaluations. The US images were not diagnostic for either the malignant or benign conditions. The correlation between the diagnosis using US and the final diagnosis was calculated as 0.436 (p = 0.006). However, the USE images were more informative since the correlation ratio between the USE results and the final diagnosis was found to be 0.723 (p < 0.001). While the area under the concentration curve (AUC) values that were used for the diagnostic determination of the US results were inconclusive at 0.274 (p < 0.021), the AUC values for USE were significant, with a diagnostic value of 0.866 for all cases (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The USE modality, which is not commonly used in routine practice, has the potential to solve the problem of differentiation of nipple retraction etiologies in the near future.