Literature DB >> 27277029

Characterizing spatiotemporal information loss in sparse-sampling-based dynamic MRI for monitoring respiration-induced tumor motion in radiotherapy.

Tatsuya J Arai1, Joris Nofiele2, Ananth J Madhuranthakam3, Qing Yuan2, Ivan Pedrosa3, Rajiv Chopra3, Amit Sawant4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sparse-sampling and reconstruction techniques represent an attractive strategy to achieve faster image acquisition speeds, while maintaining adequate spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio in rapid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The authors investigate the use of one such sequence, broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique (k-t BLAST) in monitoring tumor motion for thoracic and abdominal radiotherapy and examine the potential trade-off between increased sparsification (to increase imaging speed) and the potential loss of "true" information due to greater reliance on a priori information.
METHODS: Lung tumor motion trajectories in the superior-inferior direction, previously recorded from ten lung cancer patients, were replayed using a motion phantom module driven by an MRI-compatible motion platform. Eppendorf test tubes filled with water which serve as fiducial markers were placed in the phantom. The modeled rigid and deformable motions were collected in a coronal image slice using balanced fast field echo in conjunction with k-t BLAST. Root mean square (RMS) error was used as a metric of spatial accuracy as measured trajectories were compared to input data. The loss of spatial information was characterized for progressively increasing acceleration factor from 1 to 16; the resultant sampling frequency was increased approximately from 2.5 to 19 Hz when the principal direction of the motion was set along frequency encoding direction. In addition to the phantom study, respiration-induced tumor motions were captured from two patients (kidney tumor and lung tumor) at 13 Hz over 49 s to demonstrate the impact of high speed motion monitoring over multiple breathing cycles. For each subject, the authors compared the tumor centroid trajectory as well as the deformable motion during free breathing.
RESULTS: In the rigid and deformable phantom studies, the RMS error of target tracking at the acquisition speed of 19 Hz was approximately 0.3-0.4 mm, which was smaller than the reconstructed pixel resolution of 0.67 mm. In the patient study, the dynamic 2D MRI enabled the monitoring of cycle-to-cycle respiratory variability present in the tumor position. It was seen that the range of centroid motion as well as the area covered due to target motion during each individual respiratory cycle was underestimated compared to the entire motion range observed over multiple breathing cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors' initial results demonstrate that sparse-sampling- and reconstruction-based dynamic MRI can be used to achieve adequate image acquisition speeds without significant information loss for the task of radiotherapy guidance. Such monitoring can yield spatial and temporal information superior to conventional offline and online motion capture methods used in thoracic and abdominal radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27277029      PMCID: PMC4866962          DOI: 10.1118/1.4948684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  40 in total

1.  Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report.

Authors:  Joep C Stroom; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tsao; Peter Boesiger; Klaas P Pruessmann
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Analysis of intrathoracic tumor mobility during whole breathing cycle by dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Christian Plathow; Sebastian Ley; Christian Fink; Michael Puderbach; Waldemar Hosch; Astrid Schmähl; Jürgen Debus; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Investigation on effect of image lag in fluoroscopic images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) on accuracy of target tracking in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rie Tanaka; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Shinichiro Mori; Suguru Dobashi; Motoki Kumagai; Hiroki Kawashima; Shinichi Minohara; Sigeru Sanada
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Noise in MRI.

Authors:  A Macovski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Respiration-based sorting of dynamic MRI to derive representative 4D-MRI for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Erik Tryggestad; Aaron Flammang; Sarah Han-Oh; Russell Hales; Joseph Herman; Todd McNutt; Teboh Roland; Steven M Shea; John Wong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Reproducibility of interfraction lung motion probability distribution function using dynamic MRI: statistical analysis.

Authors:  Jing Cai; Paul W Read; James M Larner; David R Jones; Stanley H Benedict; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Simultaneous multislice excitation by parallel transmission.

Authors:  Benedikt A Poser; Robert James Anderson; Bastien Guérin; Kawin Setsompop; Weiran Deng; Azma Mareyam; Peter Serano; Lawrence L Wald; V Andrew Stenger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Acceleration of tissue phase mapping by k-t BLAST: a detailed analysis of the influence of k-t-BLAST for the quantification of myocardial motion at 3T.

Authors:  Anja Lutz; Axel Bornstedt; Robert Manzke; Patrick Etyngier; G Ulrich Nienhaus; Volker Rasche
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Phase versus amplitude sorting of 4D-CT data.

Authors:  Nicole Wink; Christoph Panknin; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yunze Yang; Steven E Schild; Thomas B Daniels; William W Wong; Mirek Fatyga; Martin Bues; Terence T Sio; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhang; Shreya Srivastava; Chunyu Wang; Thomas Beckham; Christopher Johnson; Pinaki Dutta; Annemarie Shepherd; James Mechalakos; Margie Hunt; Abraham Wu; Andreas Rimner; Guang Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.