Literature DB >> 27276253

Three-Dimensional Domain Swapping Changes the Folding Mechanism of the Forkhead Domain of FoxP1.

Exequiel Medina1, Cristóbal Córdova1, Pablo Villalobos1, Javiera Reyes1, Elizabeth A Komives2, César A Ramírez-Sarmiento3, Jorge Babul4.   

Abstract

The forkhead family of transcription factors (Fox) controls gene transcription during key processes such as regulation of metabolism, embryogenesis, and immunity. Structurally, Fox proteins feature a conserved DNA-binding domain known as forkhead. Interestingly, solved forkhead structures of members from the P subfamily (FoxP) show that they can oligomerize by three-dimensional domain swapping, whereby structural elements are exchanged between adjacent subunits, leading to an intertwined dimer. Recent evidence has largely stressed the biological relevance of domain swapping in FoxP, as several disease-causing mutations have been related to impairment of this process. Here, we explore the equilibrium folding and binding mechanism of the forkhead domain of wild-type FoxP1, and of two mutants that hinder DNA-binding (R53H) and domain swapping (A39P), using size-exclusion chromatography, circular dichroism, and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Our results show that domain swapping of FoxP1 occurs at micromolar protein concentrations within hours of incubation and is energetically favored, in contrast to classical domain-swapping proteins. Also, DNA-binding mutations do not significantly affect domain swapping. Remarkably, equilibrium unfolding of dimeric FoxP1 follows a three-state N2 ↔ 2I ↔ 2U folding mechanism in which dimer dissociation into a monomeric intermediate precedes protein unfolding, in contrast to the typical two-state model described for most domain-swapping proteins, whereas the A39P mutant follows a two-state N ↔ U folding mechanism consistent with the second transition observed for dimeric FoxP1. Also, the free-energy change of the N ↔ U in A39P FoxP1 is ∼2 kcal⋅mol(-1) larger than the I ↔ U transition of both wild-type and R53H FoxP1. Finally, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry reveals that the intermediate strongly resembles the native state. Our results suggest that domain swapping in FoxP1 is at least partially linked to monomer folding stability and follows an unusual three-state folding mechanism, which might proceed via transient structural changes rather than requiring complete protein unfolding as do most domain-swapping proteins.
Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27276253      PMCID: PMC4922571          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  51 in total

1.  The domain-swapped dimer of cyanovirin-N is in a metastable folded state: reconciliation of X-ray and NMR structures.

Authors:  Laura G Barrientos; John M Louis; Istvan Botos; Toshiyuki Mori; Zhaozhong Han; Barry R O'Keefe; Michael R Boyd; Alexander Wlodawer; Angela M Gronenborn
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  3D domain swapping: as domains continue to swap.

Authors:  Yanshun Liu; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  An ancient Fox gene cluster in bilaterian animals.

Authors:  Françoise Mazet; Chris T Amemiya; Sebastian M Shimeld
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  The emerging roles of forkhead box (Fox) proteins in cancer.

Authors:  Stephen S Myatt; Eric W-F Lam
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Dimer formation by a "monomeric" protein.

Authors:  C Park; R T Raines
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  3D domain swapping: a mechanism for oligomer assembly.

Authors:  M J Bennett; M P Schlunegger; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Structure of a domain-swapped FOXP3 dimer on DNA and its function in regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Hozefa S Bandukwala; Yongqing Wu; Markus Feuerer; Yongheng Chen; Bianca Barboza; Srimoyee Ghosh; James C Stroud; Christophe Benoist; Diane Mathis; Anjana Rao; Lin Chen
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder.

Authors:  C S Lai; S E Fisher; J A Hurst; F Vargha-Khadem; A P Monaco
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The evolution of Fox genes and their role in development and disease.

Authors:  Sridhar Hannenhalli; Klaus H Kaestner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  The C-terminal domain of dimeric serine hydroxymethyltransferase plays a key role in stabilization of the quaternary structure and cooperative unfolding of protein: domain swapping studies with enzymes having high sequence identity.

Authors:  Anant Narayan Bhatt; M Yahiya Khan; Vinod Bhakuni
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry reveals folding and allostery in protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Cesar A Ramirez-Sarmiento; Elizabeth A Komives
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Differential Local Stability Governs the Metamorphic Fold Switch of Bacterial Virulence Factor RfaH.

Authors:  Pablo Galaz-Davison; José Alejandro Molina; Steve Silletti; Elizabeth A Komives; Stefan H Knauer; Irina Artsimovitch; César A Ramírez-Sarmiento
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Unusual dimerization of a BcCsp mutant leads to reduced conformational dynamics.

Authors:  Alonso I Carvajal; Gabriel Vallejos; Elizabeth A Komives; Víctor Castro-Fernández; Diego A Leonardo; Richard C Garratt; César A Ramírez-Sarmiento; Jorge Babul
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 5.542

4.  Intrinsically Disordered Regions of the DNA-Binding Domain of Human FoxP1 Facilitate Domain Swapping.

Authors:  Exequiel Medina; Pablo Villalobos; George L Hamilton; Elizabeth A Komives; Hugo Sanabria; César A Ramírez-Sarmiento; Jorge Babul
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Discovery, Molecular Mechanisms, and Industrial Applications of Cold-Active Enzymes.

Authors:  Margarita Santiago; César A Ramírez-Sarmiento; Ricardo A Zamora; Loreto P Parra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Protein-Protein Interaction Among the FoxP Family Members and their Regulation of Two Target Genes, VLDLR and CNTNAP2 in the Zebra Finch Song System.

Authors:  Ezequiel Mendoza; Constance Scharff
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.639

7.  The protonation state of an evolutionarily conserved histidine modulates domainswapping stability of FoxP1.

Authors:  Exequiel Medina; Pablo Villalobos; Ricardo Coñuecar; César A Ramírez-Sarmiento; Jorge Babul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Dissecting FOXP2 Oligomerization and DNA Binding.

Authors:  Katharina Häußermann; Gavin Young; Philipp Kukura; Hendrik Dietz
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Unveiling the dimer/monomer propensities of Smad MH1-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Lidia Ruiz; Zuzanna Kaczmarska; Tiago Gomes; Eric Aragon; Carles Torner; Regina Freier; Blazej Baginski; Pau Martin-Malpartida; Natàlia de Martin Garrido; José A Marquez; Tiago N Cordeiro; Radoslaw Pluta; Maria J Macias
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 7.271

10.  Characterization of a recurrent missense mutation in the forkhead DNA-binding domain of FOXP1.

Authors:  Tyler B Johnson; Keegan Mechels; Ruthellen H Anderson; Jacob T Cain; David A Sturdevant; Stephen Braddock; Hailey Pinz; Mark A Wilson; Megan Landsverk; Kyle J Roux; Jill M Weimer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.