| Literature DB >> 27275832 |
Pedro Luis Ramos-González1,2, Camila Chabi-Jesus3,4,5, Orlene Guerra-Peraza6, Michèle Claire Breton7, Gabriella Dias Arena8,9, Maria Andreia Nunes10, Elliot Watanabe Kitajima11, Marcos Antonio Machado12, Juliana Freitas-Astúa13,14.
Abstract
Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV-C) causes a severe disease affecting citrus orchards in the Western hemisphere. This study reveals the molecular variability of the virus by analyzing four genomic regions (p29, p15, MP and RNA2-intergenic region) distributed over its two RNAs. Nucleotide diversity (π) values were relatively low but statistically different over the analyzed genes and subpopulations, indicating their distinct evolutionary history. Values of πp29 and πMP were higher than those of πp15 and πRNA2-IR, whereas πMP was increased due to novel discovered isolates phylogenetically clustered in a divergent clade that we called SJP. Isolate BR_SP_SJP_01 RNA1 and RNA2 sequences, clade SJP, showed an identity of 85.6% and 88.4%, respectively, with those corresponding to CiLV-C, the type member of the genus Cilevirus, and its RNA2 5'-proximal region was revealed as a minor donor in a putative inter-clade recombination event. In addition to citrus, BR_SP_SJP_01 naturally infects the weed Commelina benghalensis and is efficiently transmitted by Brevipalpus yothersi mites. Our data demonstrated that negative selection was the major force operating in the evaluated viral coding regions and defined amino acids putatively relevant for the biological function of cilevirus proteins. This work provides molecular tools and sets up a framework for further epidemiological studies.Entities:
Keywords: Brevipalpus-transmitted viruses; cilevirus; citrus leprosis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27275832 PMCID: PMC4926173 DOI: 10.3390/v8060153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1(a) Citrus leprosis symptoms in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) fruits, twig and leaves. (b) Genomic organization of Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV-C). Blue solid bars indicate regions used in the variability study. RdRp: RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; p29: putative coat protein; MP: putative 30K superfamily movement protein; p15, p61 and p24: proteins with unknown functions. IR: intergenic region. An: poly(A) tail.
Complete list of CiLV-C sequences used in this work. Accession numbers in the GenBank database for genomic region, host and year of collection of each viral isolates are indicated.
| Isolate Identification 1 and Host 2 of Collection | Collection Year | Viral Genomic Region | GenBank Accession No. | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brazilian isolates | ||||
| BR_MG_AFE_01 | 2012 | KR093040 | This work | |
| BR_SP_AMP_01 | 2012 | KR093041 | This work | |
| KR093078 | ||||
| IR | KR093139 | |||
| KR093106 | ||||
| BR_SE_AJU_01 | 2012 | KR093042 | This work | |
| KR093079 | ||||
| IR | KR093140 | |||
| KR093107 | ||||
| BR_SP_ARA_01 | 2014 | KR093043 | This work | |
| KR093080 | ||||
| IR | KR093141 | |||
| KR093108 | ||||
| BR_PA_BEL_01 | 2012 | KR093045 | This work | |
| KR136415 | ||||
| IR | KR093143 | |||
| KR093110 | ||||
| BR_SP_BRM_01 ( | 2012 | JQ944802 | [ | |
| BR_SP_BRM_02 | 2012 | KR093046 | This work | |
| KR093084 | ||||
| IR | KR093144 | |||
| KR093112 | ||||
| BR_DF_BSB_01 | 2012 | KR093047 | This work | |
| KR093085 | ||||
| IR | KR093145 | |||
| KR093113 | ||||
| BR_SP_CMP_01 | 2012 | KR093049 | This work | |
| BR_SP_CSB_01 | 2012 | KR093050 | This work | |
| KR093086 | ||||
| BR_SP_CLN_01 | 2012 | KR093051 | This work | |
| KR093082 | ||||
| BR_MG_CGZ_01 | 2012 | KR093048 | This work | |
| KR093087 | ||||
| IR | KR093146 | |||
| KR093114 | ||||
| BR_SP_CCH_01 | 2012 | KR093052 | This work | |
| KR093088 | ||||
| IR | KR093147 | |||
| KR093115 | ||||
| BR_SP_CRD_01 | 2006 | RNA1 | DQ352194 | [ |
| RNA2 | DQ352195 | |||
| BR_SP_CRD_02 | 2012 | KR093053 | This work | |
| KR093089 | ||||
| IR | KR093148 | |||
| KR093116 | ||||
| BR_SP_CRD_03 | 2012 | KR093117 | This work | |
| BR_SP_CSM_01 | 2012 | KR093054 | This work | |
| KR093083 | ||||
| IR | KR093149 | |||
| KR093111 | ||||
| BR_GO_GYN_01 | 2012 | KR093055 | This work | |
| KR093090 | ||||
| IR | KR093150 | |||
| KR093118 | ||||
| BR_MG_LAV_01 | 2012 | KR093120 | This work | |
| BR_SC_LSP_01 | 2012 | KR093056 | This work | |
| KR093091 | ||||
| IR | KR093151 | |||
| KR093119 | ||||
| BR_PR_LDB_01 | 2012 | KR093057 | This work | |
| KR093092 | ||||
| IR | KR093152 | |||
| KR093121 | ||||
| BR_AM_MAO_01 | 2012 | KR093058 | This work | |
| KR093093 | ||||
| IR | KR093153 | |||
| KR093122 | ||||
| BR_PR_MGF_01 | 2012 | KR093059 | This work | |
| KR093094 | ||||
| IR | KR093154 | |||
| KR093123 | ||||
| BR_SP_MRN_01 | 2012 | KR093060 | This work | |
| KR136416 | ||||
| IR | KR093155 | |||
| KR093124 | ||||
| BR_SC_NCH_01 | 2012 | KR093061 | This work | |
| BR_SC_NTB_01 | 2012 | KR093062 | This work | |
| BR_TO_PMW_01 | 2012 | KR093063 | This work | |
| KR093105 | ||||
| IR | KR093166 | |||
| KR093134 | ||||
| BR_SP_PRB_01 | 2014 | KR093064 | This work | |
| KR093095 | ||||
| IR | KR093156 | |||
| KR093125 | ||||
| BR_GO_PNT_01 | 2012 | KR093065 | This work | |
| KR093096 | ||||
| KR093126 | ||||
| BR_SP_PRT_01 | 2012 | KR093066 | This work | |
| KR093097 | ||||
| IR | KR093157 | |||
| KR093127 | ||||
| BR_AC_RBR_01 | 2012 | KR093067 | This work | |
| BR_SP_ITU_01 | 2012 | KR093070 | This work | |
| KR093099 | ||||
| IR | KR093159 | |||
| KR093129 | ||||
| BR_MG_STC_01 | 2012 | KR093069 | This work | |
| BR_SP_SAP_01 | 2012 | KR093068 | This work | |
| KR093098 | ||||
| IR | KR093158 | |||
| KR093128 | ||||
| BR_SP_JBT_01 | 2006 | RNA1 | DQ157466 | [ |
| RNA2 | DQ157465 | |||
| BR_SP_SNG_01 | 2012 | KR093071 | This work | |
| KR093100 | ||||
| IR | KR093160 | |||
| KR093130 | ||||
| BR_SP_SJP_01 | 2012 | RNA1 | KP336746 | This work |
| RNA2 | KP336747 | |||
| BR_SP_SJP_02 | 2012 | KR093072 | This work | |
| KR093101 | ||||
| IR | KR093161 | |||
| KR093135 | ||||
| BR_SP_SJP_03 | 2012 | KR093167 | This work | |
| IR | KR093162 | |||
| KR093136 | ||||
| BR_SP_SJP_04 ( | 2013 | KR093077 | This work | |
| KR093137 | ||||
| BR_SP_SDM_01 | 2015 | KT253463 | This work | |
| KT253469 | ||||
| IR | KT253475 | |||
| KT253481 | ||||
| BR_SP_SDM_02 | 2015 | KT253464 | This work | |
| KT253470 | ||||
| IR | KT253476 | |||
| KT253482 | ||||
| BR_SP_SDM_03 | 2015 | KT253465 | This work | |
| KT253471 | ||||
| IR | KT253477 | |||
| KT253483 | ||||
| BR_SP_SDM_04 | 2015 | KT253466 | This work | |
| KT253472 | ||||
| IR | KT253478 | |||
| KT253484 | ||||
| BR_SP_SDM_05 | 2015 | KT253467 | This work | |
| KT253473 | ||||
| IR | KT253479 | |||
| KT253485 | ||||
| BR_SP_SDM_06 | 2015 | KT253468 | This work | |
| KT253474 | ||||
| IR | KT253480 | |||
| KT253486 | ||||
| BR_RJ_TNG_01 | 2012 | KR093073 | This work | |
| KR093102 | ||||
| IR | KR093163 | |||
| KR093131 | ||||
| BR_SP_TTI_01 | 2012 | KR093074 | This work | |
| KR093103 | ||||
| IR | KR093164 | |||
| KR093132 | ||||
| BR_MT_TRN_01 | 2012 | KR093075 | This work | |
| KR093104 | ||||
| IR | KR093165 | |||
| KR093133 | ||||
| BR_MG_UBA_01 | 2012 | KR093076 | This work | |
| KR093138 | ||||
| Isolates from other countries | ||||
| AR_01 | 2012 | JX163907 | [ | |
| AR_02 | 2012 | KR093044 | This work | |
| KR093081 | ||||
| IR | KR093142 | |||
| KR093109 | ||||
| CO_01 | 2005 | DQ272491 | [ | |
| MX_01 | 2010 | HQ292778 | [ | |
| PA_01 | 2006 | RNA1 | DQ388512 | [ |
| RNA2 | DQ388513 | |||
| PY_01 | 2012 | JX163908 | [ | |
1 Unless otherwise indicated, the collection hosts for isolates described in this work were sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osb.) trees; 2 Isolates were designated including several entries separated by underscores. First two letters identify the country (AR: Argentina; BR: Brazil; CO: Colombia; MX: Mexico; PA: Panama and PY: Paraguay), followed by the Brazilian state (AC: Acre; AM: Amazonas; DF: Distrito Federal; GO: Goiás; MG: Minas Gerais; MS: Mato Grosso do Sul; PA: Pará; PR: Paraná; RJ: Rio de Janeiro; SC: Santa Catarina; SE: Sergipe; SP: São Paulo and TO: Tocantins), the city of collection (AFE: Alfenas; AJU: Aracaju; AMP: Amparo; ARA: Araras; BEL: Belém; BRM: Borborema; BSB: Brasília; CCH: Conchal; CRD: Cordeirópolis; CGZ: Comendador Gomes; CLN: Colina; CMP: Campinas; CSB: Casa Branca; CSM: Cosmorama; GYN: Goiânia; ITU: Itu; JBT: Jaboticabal; LAV: Lavras; LDB: Londrina; LSP: Linha Espuma; MAO: Manaus; MGF: Maringá; MRN: Mirandópolis; NCH: Nova Erechim; NTB: Nova Itaberaba; PMW: Palmas; PNT: Planaltina; PRB: Piracicaba; PRT: Pratânia; SAP: Santo Antônio de Posse; SDM: Sud Mennucci; SJP: São José do Rio Preto; SNG: Serra Negra; STC: Santa Conceição; TNG: Tanguá; TRN: Terenos; TTI: Tatuí; UBA: Uberaba; UBT: Ubatuba), and the sample number.
Figure 2Midpoint-rooted neighbor joining phylogenetic trees of CiLV-C isolates based on four genomic regions. Isolates of the clade CRD and SJP were highlighted in blue and red, respectively. (a) p29 complete sequence (792 nt); (b) MP partial sequence (300 nt); (c) p15 complete sequence (393 nt); (d) IR (940 nt); (e) Fragment encompassing concatenated sequences of the RNA2 (p15 + IR + MP, 1633 nt). Sequences from CiLV-C2 isolate Colombia (CiLV-C2_Co, GenBank accessions JX000024 and JX000025) and CiLV-C2 isolate Hawaii (CiLV-C2_Hw, GenBank accessions KC626783 and KC626784) were incorporated as outgroup. Bootstrap support values (1000 iterations) of main branches are indicated. Branches with less than 50% bootstrap support were condensed.
Population genetic parameters and selection pressure estimates for four CiLV-C genomic regions. Independent analyses were carried out including all isolates and only those grouped within the clade CRD according to the phylogenetic study.
| Genomic Region | Region Length (nt) | Dataset 1/# of Isolates | π | h | Hd | dS | dN | ω (dN/dS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 792 | All/47 | 0.053 ± 0.009 | 40 | 0.990 | 0.252 ± 0.037 2 | 0.018 ± 0.003 2 | 0.07 | |
| CRD/38 | 0.009 ± 0.001 | 32 | 0.986 | 0.022 ± 0.004 | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0.18 | ||
| 393 | All/41 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 30 | 0.961 | 0.014 ± 0.004 | 0.007 ± 0.002 | 0.50 | |
| CRD/31 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 24 | 0.953 | 0.014 ± 0.004 | 0.008 ± 0.002 | 0.57 | ||
| 300 | All/46 | 0.056 ± 0.009 | 22 | 0.854 | 0.202 ± 0.043 | 0.021 ± 0.007 | 0.10 | |
| CRD/36 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 17 | 0.778 | 0.019 ± 0.006 | 0.005 ± 0.002 | 0.26 | ||
| 940 | All/38 | 0.021 ± 0.003 | 38 | 1 | - | - | - | |
| CRD/28 | 0.016 ± 0.003 | 28 | 1 | - | - | - |
1 Only citrus isolates were considered. 2 Standard error of means was calculated by using the bootstrap method implemented in the MEGA6 program. All: Total population; CRD: Only members of the clade CRD; π: Nucleotide diversity; h: Number of haplotypes; Hd: haplotype (gene) diversity; dS: frequency of synonymous substitution per site; dN: frequency of non-synonymous substitution per site.
Figure 3Evidence of recombination in RNA2 of the isolate BR_PR_LDB_01. Similarity plots of the recombinant with the minor (isolate BR_SP_SJR_01) and major (isolate AR_02) parents are shown as obtained from the analysis of concatenated sequences of the RNA2 (p15 + IR + MP) using the RDP software.
Amino acids likely to be under selection in CiLV-C.
| ORF | Nucleotide Substitution Model | Methods | Selection Pressure | Amino Acid Position in the Sequence of Isolate BR_SP_SJP_01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrN | SLAC-FEL-REL | purification | 27, 39, 113, 156, 157, 173, 207, 211, 227, 259 | |
| FEL-REL | purification | 2, 7, 23, 30, 47, 49, 57, 58, 76, 87, 99, 100, 104, 116, 118, 133, 137, 140, 151, 154, 165, 171, 172, 180, 181, 190, 196, 202, 213, 214, 217, 219, 245, 254 | ||
| HKY85 | SLAC-FEL-REL | - | - | |
| FEL-REL | positive | 91 | ||
| GTR | SLAC-FEL-REL | purification | 71, 112, 148 | |
| FEL-REL | purification | 59, 74, 80, 84, 85, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98, 99, 102, 103, 111, 115, 118, 121, 136, 146 |
1 Fragment of the gene corresponding to amino acid stretch between the positions 55 and 150.
Figure 4Differential detection of CiLV-C isolates belonging to clades CRD or SJP. 1% agarose gel electrophoresis of RT-PCR products obtained from nine CiLV-C isolates. p29 CiLV-C CRD and p29 CiLV-C SJP indicate reactions carried out using specific primers designed to detect isolates of the clade CRD and SJP, respectively. Lane 1: molecular weight marker, 1 Kbp Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA); lanes 2 & 13: healthy citrus plant; lanes 3 & 14: citrus tree infected with CiLV-C2 isolate Colombia; lanes 4 & 15: Arabidopsis plant infected with CiLV-C isolate BR_SP_SJP_01; lanes 5 & 16: citrus plant from Cordeirópolis, SP (positive control sample for the clade CRD); lanes 6 & 17: citrus plant, São José do Rio Preto, SP (source of the isolate BR_SP_SJP_01—positive sample for the clade SJP); lanes 7 & 18: tropical spiderwort plant, São José do Rio Preto, SP (isolate BR_SP_SJP_04); lanes 8 & 19: citrus plant, Argentina (isolate AR_02); lanes 9 & 20: citrus plant, Londrina, PR (isolate BR_PR_LDB_01); lanes 10 & 21: citrus plant, Brasília, DF (isolate BR_DF_BSB_01); lanes 11 & 22: citrus plant, Maringá, PR (isolate BR_PR_MGF_01); lanes 12 & 23: citrus plant, Itu, SP (isolate BR_SP_ITU_01).
Figure 5Nucleotide identity plot among BR_SP_SJP_01 full-length genome and those from CiLV-C, CiLV-C2 Colombia and CiLV-C2 Hawaii. Plots were generated with a sliding window size of 300 nt and a shift of one nucleotide at a time from aligned sequences. Nucleotide position is indicated at the beginning of each ORF according to the BR_SP_SJP_01 sequence.
Nucleotide and deduced amino acids identities between the isolate BR_SP_SJP_01 and definitive and tentative cileviruses.
| BR_SP_SJP_01 | CiLV-C | CiLV-C2 Isolate Colombia | CiLV-C2 Isolate Hawaii | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nt | aa | nt | aa | nt | aa | |
| 85.6 | - | 60.1 | - | 60.1 | - | |
| ORF | 85.4 | 93.1 | 61.4 | 59.3 | 61.4 | 59.1 |
| ORF | 85.0 | 90.5 | 49.2 | 36.0 | 49.0 | 35.0 |
| 88.4 | - | 52.6 | - | 52.0 | - | |
| ORF | 99.5 | 100.0 | 44.7 | 20.8 | 45.2 | 24.6 |
| ORF | 81.8 | 84.0 | 52.0 | 32.0 | 51.2 | 33.1 |
| ORF | 86.8 | 91.9 | 56.6 | 51.7 | 54.9 | 51.4 |
| ORF | 87.4 | 93.9 | 63.9 | 63.1 | 62.0 | 61.6 |
| IR | 96.7 | - | 46.0 | - | 46.0 | - |
Figure 6Deduced amino acid sequence alignments of P29 (a) and P15 (b) proteins from CiLV-C and CiLV-C2. Blue letters indicate positions under selection in CiLV-C as shown by a combination of SLAC, FEL and REL methods. (a) Consensus predicted secondary structures of P29 proteins from CiLV-C and CilV-C2 are on the top and bottom of each block, respectively. α, alpha-helix; β, beta strand; (b) Conserved Cys residues involved in a putative Zn-finger motif are highlighted with green stars.