Literature DB >> 27274889

The effect of ureteroscope size in the treatment of ureteral stone: 15-year experience of an endoscopist.

Muhammet Fatih Kılınç1, Ömer Gökhan Doluoğlu1, Tolga Karakan1, Ayhan Dalkılıç2, Nurettin Cem Sönmez2, Cem Nedim Yücetürk1, Berkan Reşorlu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the ureter stone treatment results performed by using different- caliber semirigid ureteroscopes (URS).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients who were treated for ureteral stones by a single endoscopist between January 2000 and March 2015 were analyzed. The patients were divided into 3 groups in accordance with the caliber of the ureteroscope used: 10/10.5 F Storz (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) (January 2002-January 2005) URS was used in group 1, 8.9/9.8 F Storz (February 2005-December 2011) URS was used in group 2, and 6/7.5 FWolf (Richard Wolf, Knittlingen, Germany) (January 2012-March 2015) URS was used in group 3. Patients' age and gender, size and site of stones, stone-free rates (SFR), intra- and perioperative complication rates, and durations of surgery were compared among the groups. Intraoperative complications were classified according to modified Satava, and perioperative complications were classified according to modified Clavien classification systems.
RESULTS: A total of 2461 patients treated for ureteral stones were analyzed. There were 583 patients in group 1 (10/10.5 F Storz), 1302 patients in group 2 (8.9/9.8 F Storz), and 576 patients in group 3 (6/7.5 F Wolf). SFR were 83.7%, 87.4%, and 92.2% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.01). Duration of surgery was 30.34±10.36 min in group 1, 31.61±10.10 min in group 2, and 42.40±7.35 min in group 3 (p=0.01). The overall complication rates classified according to modified Satava classification were 10.8%, 7.6%, and 6.9% (p=0.01) while grade 3 modified Satava complication rates were 1.9%, 1.5%and 0.5% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that more frequent use of a small- caliber URS resulted in a longer duration of surgery and an increased rate for JJ stent insertion, however it facilitated a safer and more successful ureteroscopy procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; ureteral stones; ureteroscopy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27274889      PMCID: PMC4857919          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2016.84594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  17 in total

1.  Results with 7.5F versus 10F rigid ureteroscopes in treatment of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Ozgur Yaycioglu; Sezgin Guvel; Ferhat Kilinc; Tulga Egilmez; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The effectiveness of 4.5F ultrathin semirigid ureteroscope in the management of ureteral stones in prepubertal children: is there a need for any ureteral dilatation?

Authors:  Canan Kocaoglu; Keramettin Ugur Ozkan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Meta-analysis of postoperatively stenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Turun Song; Banghua Liao; Shuo Zheng; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-05-15

4.  Comparison of a 4.5 F semi-rigid ureteroscope with a 7.5 F rigid ureteroscope in the treatment of ureteral stones in preschool-age children.

Authors:  Murat Atar; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Necmettin Penbegul; Haluk Soylemez; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu; Yasar Bozkurt; Suleyman Cakmakci
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-07-11

Review 5.  Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ghulam Nabi; J Cook; J N'Dow; S McClinton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-20

6.  Failures and complications of transurethral ureteroscopy in 297 cases: conventional rigid instruments vs. small caliber semirigid ureteroscopes.

Authors:  F Francesca; V Scattoni; L Nava; P Pompa; M Grasso; P Rigatti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Clavien classification of semirigid ureteroscopy complications: a prospective study.

Authors:  Swarnendu Mandal; Apul Goel; Manish Kumar Singh; Rohit Kathpalia; Deepak S Nagathan; Satya N Sankhwar; Vishwajeet Singh; Bhupender P Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The 6.9 F semirigid ureteroscope in clinical use.

Authors:  O Abdel-Razzak; D H Bagley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Comparison of different ureteroscope sizes in treating ureteral calculi in adult patients.

Authors:  Gokhan Atis; Ozgur Arikan; Cenk Gurbuz; Asıf Yildirim; Bülent Erol; Sabri Pelit; Ismail Ulus; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  An evaluation of ureteral laser lithotripsy: 225 consecutive patients.

Authors:  S P Dretler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Prevention strategies for ureteral stricture following ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Hao Dong; Yonghan Peng; Ling Li; Xiaofeng Gao
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-09-22

2.  Ureteral stricture after ureteroscopy for stones: A prospective study for the incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Amr E Darwish; Mohamed M Gadelmoula; Islam F Abdelkawi; Atef M Abdellatif; Ahmed M Abdel-Moneim; Hisham M Hammouda
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

3.  Cost-effectiveness of using stone cone, balloon dilator, stone basket, and entrapment device in ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones.

Authors:  Kürşat Çeçen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.