Literature DB >> 1967658

An evaluation of ureteral laser lithotripsy: 225 consecutive patients.

S P Dretler1.   

Abstract

We treated 225 patients with 227 ureteral calculi (5 steinstrasse) via the pulsed dye laser with 9.5F rigid, 7.2F semirigid and flexible, steerable ureteroscopes. The 222 calculi (excluding steinstrasse) were fragmented by laser alone in 141 cases (64%), laser and a basket in 30 (13%), and laser and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 33 (15%). The laser failed in 18 cases (8%). Of the 222 calculi 165 were impacted. Of 29 impacted upper ureteral calculi 15 were treated by laser disimpaction and fragmentation, 13 by laser disimpaction followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and 1 by an operation. Of 42 mid ureteral calculi (30 impacted) 24 were treated successfully by laser fragmentation and 14 by fragmentation followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, while 4 failed laser therapy. Among 151 lower ureteral and tunnel calculi laser fragmentation was successful in 132 cases (87%), laser followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was successful in 6 and 13 failed laser treatment. There were no ureteral strictures and no ureteral injuries related to use of the laser. The pulsed dye laser is safe and effective treatment for impacted upper and mid ureteral calculi, small mid ureteral calculi in female patients, and lower ureteral calculi in male and female patients. Use of the laser in conjunction with other endourological methods resulted in the need for an operation in 2 of 225 patients (0.9%) with ureteral calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1967658     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39929-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  ESWL '90--state of the art. Limitations and future trends of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; P Alken
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1990

Review 2.  [Importance of open and laparoscopic stone surgery].

Authors:  M Hruza; C Türk; T Frede; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The effect of ureteroscope size in the treatment of ureteral stone: 15-year experience of an endoscopist.

Authors:  Muhammet Fatih Kılınç; Ömer Gökhan Doluoğlu; Tolga Karakan; Ayhan Dalkılıç; Nurettin Cem Sönmez; Cem Nedim Yücetürk; Berkan Reşorlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-06

4.  The role of ureteroscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in various indications.

Authors:  Y Ilker; O Dillioğlugil; T Tarcan; L Türkeri; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  The role of stenting in relieving loin pain following ureteroscopic stone therapy for persisting renal colic with hydronephrosis.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Treatment of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  J E Wickham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-11-27

7.  Developments in the ureteroscopes, techniques and accessories associated with laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  G M Watson; B Landers; R Nauth-Misir; J E Wickham
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Laser lithotripsy for ureteric calculi: results in 250 patients.

Authors:  J D Kelly; P F Keane; S R Johnston; R M Kernohan
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1995-10

9.  Ureteroscopic treatment of larger renal calculi (>2 cm).

Authors:  Demetrius H Bagley; Kelly A Healy; Nir Kleinmann
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-07-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.