Rozalina G McCoy1, Kasia J Lipska2, Xiaoxi Yao3, Joseph S Ross4, Victor M Montori5, Nilay D Shah6. 1. Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota2Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota3Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia. 2. Section of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota3Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Section of General Medicine and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut6Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Healt. 5. Division of Endocrinology Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota9Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 6. Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota3Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota10OptumLabs, Cambridge, M.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Intensive glucose-lowering treatment among patients with non-insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of intensive treatment and the association between intensive treatment, clinical complexity, and incidence of severe hypoglycemia among adults with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of administrative, pharmacy, and laboratory data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2013. The study included nonpregnant adults 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes who achieved and maintained a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level less than 7.0% without use of insulin and had no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia in the prior 12 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk-adjusted probability of intensive treatment and incident severe hypoglycemia, stratified by patient clinical complexity. Intensive treatment was defined as use of more glucose-lowering medications than recommended by practice guidelines at specific index HbA1c levels. Severe hypoglycemia was ascertained by ambulatory, emergency department, and hospital claims for hypoglycemia during the 2 years after the index HbA1c test. Patients were categorized as having high vs low clinical complexity if they were 75 years or older, had dementia or end-stage renal disease, or had 3 or more serious chronic conditions. RESULTS: Of 31 542 eligible patients (median age, 58 years; interquartile range, 51-65 years; 15 483 women [49.1%]; 18 188 white [57.7%]), 3910 (12.4%) had clinical complexity. The risk-adjusted probability of intensive treatment was 25.7% (95% CI, 25.1%-26.2%) in patients with low clinical complexity and 20.8% (95% CI, 19.4%-22.2%) in patients with high clinical complexity. In patients with low clinical complexity, the risk-adjusted probability of severe hypoglycemia during the subsequent 2 years was 1.02% (95% CI, 0.87%-1.17%) with standard treatment and 1.30% (95% CI, 0.98%-1.62%) with intensive treatment (absolute difference, 0.28%; 95% CI, -0.10% to 0.66%). In patients with high clinical complexity, intensive treatment significantly increased the risk-adjusted probability of severe hypoglycemia from 1.74% (95% CI, 1.28%-2.20%) with standard treatment to 3.04% (95% CI, 1.91%-4.18%) with intensive treatment (absolute difference, 1.30%; 95% CI, 0.10%-2.50%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: More than 20% of patients with type 2 diabetes received intensive treatment that may be unnecessary. Among patients with high clinical complexity, intensive treatment nearly doubles the risk of severe hypoglycemia.
IMPORTANCE: Intensive glucose-lowering treatment among patients with non-insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of intensive treatment and the association between intensive treatment, clinical complexity, and incidence of severe hypoglycemia among adults with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of administrative, pharmacy, and laboratory data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2013. The study included nonpregnant adults 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes who achieved and maintained a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level less than 7.0% without use of insulin and had no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia in the prior 12 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk-adjusted probability of intensive treatment and incident severe hypoglycemia, stratified by patient clinical complexity. Intensive treatment was defined as use of more glucose-lowering medications than recommended by practice guidelines at specific index HbA1c levels. Severe hypoglycemia was ascertained by ambulatory, emergency department, and hospital claims for hypoglycemia during the 2 years after the index HbA1c test. Patients were categorized as having high vs low clinical complexity if they were 75 years or older, had dementia or end-stage renal disease, or had 3 or more serious chronic conditions. RESULTS: Of 31 542 eligible patients (median age, 58 years; interquartile range, 51-65 years; 15 483 women [49.1%]; 18 188 white [57.7%]), 3910 (12.4%) had clinical complexity. The risk-adjusted probability of intensive treatment was 25.7% (95% CI, 25.1%-26.2%) in patients with low clinical complexity and 20.8% (95% CI, 19.4%-22.2%) in patients with high clinical complexity. In patients with low clinical complexity, the risk-adjusted probability of severe hypoglycemia during the subsequent 2 years was 1.02% (95% CI, 0.87%-1.17%) with standard treatment and 1.30% (95% CI, 0.98%-1.62%) with intensive treatment (absolute difference, 0.28%; 95% CI, -0.10% to 0.66%). In patients with high clinical complexity, intensive treatment significantly increased the risk-adjusted probability of severe hypoglycemia from 1.74% (95% CI, 1.28%-2.20%) with standard treatment to 3.04% (95% CI, 1.91%-4.18%) with intensive treatment (absolute difference, 1.30%; 95% CI, 0.10%-2.50%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: More than 20% of patients with type 2 diabetes received intensive treatment that may be unnecessary. Among patients with high clinical complexity, intensive treatment nearly doubles the risk of severe hypoglycemia.
Authors: Andrew I Geller; Nadine Shehab; Maribeth C Lovegrove; Scott R Kegler; Kelly N Weidenbach; Gina J Ryan; Daniel S Budnitz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Rozalina G McCoy; Yuanhui Zhang; Jeph Herrin; Brian T Denton; Jennifer E Mason; Victor M Montori; Steven A Smith; Nilay D Shah Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Sheldon Greenfield; John Billimek; Fabio Pellegrini; Monica Franciosi; Giorgia De Berardis; Antonio Nicolucci; Sherrie H Kaplan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: William Duckworth; Carlos Abraira; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Nicholas Emanuele; Peter D Reaven; Franklin J Zieve; Jennifer Marks; Stephen N Davis; Rodney Hayward; Stuart R Warren; Steven Goldman; Madeline McCarren; Mary Ellen Vitek; William G Henderson; Grant D Huang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul J Wallace; Nilay D Shah; Taylor Dennen; Paul A Bleicher; Paul D Bleicher; William H Crown Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Kasia J Lipska; Patrick J O'Connor; Jennifer Y Liu; Howard H Moffet; Emily B Schroeder; Jean M Lawrence; Gregory A Nichols; Katherine M Newton; Ram D Pathak; Jay Desai; Beth Waitzfelder; Melissa G Butler; Abraham Thomas; John F Steiner Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Matthew L Maciejewski; Xiaojuan Mi; Jeremy Sussman; Melissa Greiner; Lesley H Curtis; Judy Ng; Samuel C Haffer; Eve A Kerr Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nino G Joy; Jennifer M Perkins; Maia Mikeladze; Lisa Younk; Donna B Tate; Stephen N Davis Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.852